World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Chris Hyde publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Hyde sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Chris Hyde D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Hyde sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chris Hyde is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Oncology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Economics and Econometrics, and Epidemiology.

The main research topics addressed by Hyde include:

  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

Hyde has published work in various frequent venues such as:

  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Annals of Internal Medicine
  • The Analyst
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Hyde include:

  • "Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist," 2020, BMJ
  • "QUADAS-C: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies," 2021, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • "Study designs for comparative diagnostic test accuracy: A methodological review and classification scheme," 2021, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • "Real-world evaluation of a novel technology for quantitative simultaneous antibody detection against multiple SARS-CoV-2 antigens in a cohort of patients presenting with COVID-19 syndrome," 2020, The Analyst
  • "Quality of life in restorative versus non-restorative resections for rectal cancer: systematic review," 2021, BJS Open

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Yemisi Takwoingi
  • Jaime Peters
  • Jonathan J Deeks
  • Mariska Leeflang
  • Clare Davenport

Hyde has contributed to book publications as well, including a 2024 title published by Frontiers Media titled Artificial Intelligence in Cutaneous Lesions: Where do we Stand and What is Next?

Best Publications

  • Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies The PRISMA-DTA Statement

    Matthew D.F. McInnes;David Moher;Brett D. Thombs;Brett D. Thombs;Trevor A. McGrath

  • Recombinant Human Erythropoietins and Cancer Patients: Updated Meta-Analysis of 57 Studies Including 9353 Patients

    Julia Bohlius;Jayne Wilson;Jerome Seidenfeld;Margaret Piper

  • Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

    Patrick Bossuyt;Clare Davenport;Jon Deeks;Chris Hyde

  • Autologous bone marrow stem cells to treat acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review.

    Enca Martin-Rendon;Enca Martin-Rendon;Susan J. Brunskill;Chris J. Hyde;Simon J. Stanworth

  • Needle track seeding following biopsy of liver lesions in the diagnosis of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Michael A Silva;Bassem Hegab;Christopher J Hyde;Boliang Guo

  • Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia: a systematic quantitative review

    T. Justin Clark;Doris Voit;Janesh K. Gupta;Christopher Hyde

  • Is fresh frozen plasma clinically effective? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

    S. J. Stanworth;S. J. Brunskill;C. J. Hyde;D. B. L. McClelland

  • Recombinant factor VIIa for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

    Ewurabena Simpson;Yulia Lin;Simon Stanworth;Janet Birchall

  • The clinical effectiveness of different parenting programmes for children with conduct problems: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

    Janine Dretzke;Clare Davenport;Emma Frew;Jane Barlow

  • Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist.

    Jean-Paul Salameh;Patrick N M Bossuyt;Trevor A McGrath;Brett D Thombs

  • The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (review of Technology Appraisal No. 111): a systematic review and economic model.

    Mary Bond;Gabriel Rogers;Jaime Peters;Rob Anderson

  • Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials

    Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano;Christopher J Hyde;Kirsten J McCaffery;Patrick M M Bossuyt

  • Barriers to help seeking in people with urinary symptoms.

    C Shaw;R Tansey;C Jackson;C Hyde

  • Methods of prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia: Systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling

    C. A. Meads;J. S. Cnossen;S. Meher;A. Juarez-Garcia

  • Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer

    Thomy Tonia;Annette Mettler;Nadège Robert;Guido Schwarzer

  • Treatments for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a rapid and systematic review.

    P Brañas;R Jordan;A Fry-Smith;A Burls

  • The development and validation of a clinical prediction model to determine the probability of MODY in patients with young-onset diabetes.

    Beverley Shields;Timothy J. McDonald;Sian Ellard;M. J. Campbell

  • Teaching critical appraisal skills in healthcare settings

    Tanya Horsley;Chris Hyde;Nancy Santesso;Julie Parkes

  • Screening to prevent spontaneous preterm birth: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling

    H Honest;CA Forbes;KH Durée;G Norman

  • Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) for trauma-induced coagulopathy in adult trauma patients with bleeding

    Harriet Hunt;Simon Stanworth;Simon Stanworth;Nicola Curry;Tom Woolley

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon J. Stanworth
Simon J. Stanworth NHS Blood and Transplant
Obioha C. Ukoumunne
Obioha C. Ukoumunne University of Exeter
Rod S Taylor
Rod S Taylor University of Glasgow
Michael F. Murphy
Michael F. Murphy NHS Blood and Transplant
Jonathan J Deeks
Jonathan J Deeks University of Birmingham
Andrew T. Hattersley
Andrew T. Hattersley University of Exeter
Khalid S. Khan
Khalid S. Khan University of Granada
Robert F. Anderson
Robert F. Anderson Columbia University
Sally Hopewell
Sally Hopewell University of Oxford
Patrick M.M. Bossuyt
Patrick M.M. Bossuyt University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying medicine in the USA but are exploring alternative or complementary career options, there are many affordable online pathways to consider. Beyond becoming a physician, you can pursue highly respected and in-demand roles within healthcare—all while studying online at your own pace.

For those passionate about pharmaceuticals, the cheapest online pharmacy school programs can prepare you for a rewarding career as a pharmacist. If you’re more interested in healthcare data, consider enrolling in him programs to become a health information manager, an essential role in today’s digital healthcare environment.

Medical billing and coding is another fast-growing field, with a variety of affordable medical billing and coding programs available online for quick entry into the workforce. Alternatively, if you wish to practice advanced patient care, becoming a nurse practitioner is an excellent option—with many most affordable nurse practitioner programs offered online.

Each program opens doors to respected healthcare careers, making quality education accessible and affordable from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Chris Hyde

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles