World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 44 4639 4269 1769 1570 133 8929

Keith Loague publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Keith Loague between 1982 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Keith Loague published across 35 years, from 1982 to 2016, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1998. 6 of the 137 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 1998. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications
1982 2016

137 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Keith Loague: publications per year, 1982 to 2016
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 3
1989 3
1990 8
1991 7
1992 7
1993 2
1994 3
1995 1
1996 4
1997 7
1998 11
1999 6
2000 6
2001 4
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 8
2006 6
2007 8
2008 6
2009 3
2010 5
2011 3
2012 3
2013 6
2014 4
2015 3
2016 3
Total 137
Download as CSV

Keith Loague publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Loague sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 133 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557 133
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Keith Loague D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Loague sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248 44
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Keith Loague is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their academic profile is characterized by contributions in various areas of scientific research, although specific details about the topics, papers, and coauthors are not listed.

While information on recent publications, frequent collaboration partners, and common publication venues is not available, Keith Loague's association with Stanford University suggests engagement in an advanced research environment.

The available data does not include information on awards, book publications, or main and subfields of study. Consequently, details about the scope and focus of their research areas cannot be elaborated upon.

Given these limitations, the profile reflects a scholar with a professional base at a significant academic institution, with the potential for contributions across multiple research domains.

Best Publications

  • Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application

    Keith Loague;Richard E. Green

  • A Comparison of Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Techniques on Small Upland Catchments

    Keith M. Loague;R. Allan Freeze

  • Hydrologic‐Response simulations for the R‐5 catchment with a comprehensive physics‐based model

    Joel E. VanderKwaak;Keith Loague

  • Hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled valley to natural and applied rainfall

    David R. Montgomery;William E. Dietrich;Raymond Torres;Suzanne Prestrud Anderson

  • Unsaturated zone processes and the hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled catchment

    Raymond Torres;William E. Dietrich;David R. Montgomery;Suzanne P. Anderson

  • Subsurface flow paths in a steep, unchanneled catchment

    Suzanne Prestrud Anderson;William E. Dietrich;David R. Montgomery;Raymond Torres

  • Modeling Nonpoint Source Pollutants in the Vadose Zone with GIS

    Dennis L. Corwin;Peter J. Vaughan;Keith Loague

  • Concentration-discharge relationships in runoff from a steep, unchanneled catchment

    Suzanne Prestrud Anderson;William E. Dietrich;Raymond Torres;David R. Montgomery

  • R‐5 revisited: 1. Spatial variability of infiltration on a small rangeland catchment

    Keith Loague;Gene A. Gander

  • Physics-based hydrologic-response simulation: Seeing through the fog of equifinality

    Brian A. Ebel;Keith Loague

  • First-order exchange coefficient coupling for simulating surface water-groundwater interactions: parameter sensitivity and consistency with a physics-based approach.

    Brian A. Ebel;Benjamin B. Mirus;Christopher S. Heppner;Joel E. VanderKwaak

  • Physics-based continuous simulation of long-term near-surface hydrologic response for the Coos Bay experimental catchment

    Brian A. Ebel;Keith Loague;David R. Montgomery;William E. Dietrich

  • Physics-based hydrologic response simulation: platinum bridge, 1958 Edsel, or useful tool

    Keith Loague;Joel E. VanderKwaak

  • Impact of uncertainty in soil, climatic, and chemical information in a pesticide leaching assessment

    Keith Loague;Richard E. Green;Thomas W. Giambelluca;Tony C. Liang

  • Soil water content at R-5. Part 1. Spatial and temporal variability

    Keith Loague

  • How runoff begins (and ends): Characterizing hydrologic response at the catchment scale

    Benjamin Bernhard Manson Mirus;Keith Loague

  • Further testing of the Integrated Hydrology Model (InHM): event-based simulations for a small rangeland catchment located near Chickasha, Oklahoma

    Keith Loague;Christopher S. Heppner;Robert H. Abrams;Adrianne E. Carr

  • Uncertainty of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessments for Agricultural Regions in Hawaii: Review

    Keith Loague;R. L. Bernknopf;R. E. Green;T. W. Giambelluca

  • Near-surface hydrologic response for a steep, unchanneled catchment near Coos Bay, Oregon: 2. Physics-based simulations

    Brian A. Ebel;Keith Loague;Joel E. Vanderkwaak;William E. Dietrich

  • Assessment of Non-Point Source Pollution in the Vadose Zone

    Dennis L. Corwin;Keith M. Loague;Timothy R. Ellsworth

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian A. Ebel
Brian A. Ebel United States Geological Survey
Dennis L. Corwin
Dennis L. Corwin Agricultural Research Service
Benjamin B. Mirus
Benjamin B. Mirus United States Geological Survey
Thomas W. Giambelluca
Thomas W. Giambelluca University of Hawaii at Manoa
David R. Montgomery
David R. Montgomery University of Washington
William E. Dietrich
William E. Dietrich University of California, Berkeley
Suzanne P. Anderson
Suzanne P. Anderson University of Colorado Boulder
Stephanie K. Kampf
Stephanie K. Kampf Colorado State University
Ronaldo I. Borja
Ronaldo I. Borja Stanford University
Edzer Pebesma
Edzer Pebesma University of Münster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways that often complement other fields. Many students explore online degrees to enhance their expertise without disrupting their current roles. For creative professionals interested in integrating environmental themes, exploring an online MFA degree can provide valuable skills in communication and visualization.

Those looking to move into leadership or administrative roles within environmental organizations may benefit from a human resource management masters degree online. This skillset is crucial for managing teams and fostering sustainable workplace environments.

For senior learners seeking efficient educational options, numerous one year degrees for seniors are available. These accelerated programs allow for quick upskilling, perfect for advancing in roles related to Earth Science or transitioning careers.

Additionally, for those focused on data curation or library sciences connected to geosciences, ALA accredited MLIS programs provide specialized training in managing scientific information, which is increasingly vital in research and environmental policy development.

Best Scientists Citing Keith Loague

Recently Published Articles