World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Keith Loague publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Loague sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Keith Loague D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Loague sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Keith Loague is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their academic profile is characterized by contributions in various areas of scientific research, although specific details about the topics, papers, and coauthors are not listed.

While information on recent publications, frequent collaboration partners, and common publication venues is not available, Keith Loague's association with Stanford University suggests engagement in an advanced research environment.

The available data does not include information on awards, book publications, or main and subfields of study. Consequently, details about the scope and focus of their research areas cannot be elaborated upon.

Given these limitations, the profile reflects a scholar with a professional base at a significant academic institution, with the potential for contributions across multiple research domains.

Best Publications

  • Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application

    Keith Loague;Richard E. Green

  • A Comparison of Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Techniques on Small Upland Catchments

    Keith M. Loague;R. Allan Freeze

  • Hydrologic‐Response simulations for the R‐5 catchment with a comprehensive physics‐based model

    Joel E. VanderKwaak;Keith Loague

  • Hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled valley to natural and applied rainfall

    David R. Montgomery;William E. Dietrich;Raymond Torres;Suzanne Prestrud Anderson

  • Unsaturated zone processes and the hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled catchment

    Raymond Torres;William E. Dietrich;David R. Montgomery;Suzanne P. Anderson

  • Subsurface flow paths in a steep, unchanneled catchment

    Suzanne Prestrud Anderson;William E. Dietrich;David R. Montgomery;Raymond Torres

  • Modeling Nonpoint Source Pollutants in the Vadose Zone with GIS

    Dennis L. Corwin;Peter J. Vaughan;Keith Loague

  • Concentration-discharge relationships in runoff from a steep, unchanneled catchment

    Suzanne Prestrud Anderson;William E. Dietrich;Raymond Torres;David R. Montgomery

  • R‐5 revisited: 1. Spatial variability of infiltration on a small rangeland catchment

    Keith Loague;Gene A. Gander

  • Physics-based hydrologic-response simulation: Seeing through the fog of equifinality

    Brian A. Ebel;Keith Loague

  • First-order exchange coefficient coupling for simulating surface water-groundwater interactions: parameter sensitivity and consistency with a physics-based approach.

    Brian A. Ebel;Benjamin B. Mirus;Christopher S. Heppner;Joel E. VanderKwaak

  • Physics-based continuous simulation of long-term near-surface hydrologic response for the Coos Bay experimental catchment

    Brian A. Ebel;Keith Loague;David R. Montgomery;William E. Dietrich

  • Physics-based hydrologic response simulation: platinum bridge, 1958 Edsel, or useful tool

    Keith Loague;Joel E. VanderKwaak

  • Impact of uncertainty in soil, climatic, and chemical information in a pesticide leaching assessment

    Keith Loague;Richard E. Green;Thomas W. Giambelluca;Tony C. Liang

  • Soil water content at R-5. Part 1. Spatial and temporal variability

    Keith Loague

  • How runoff begins (and ends): Characterizing hydrologic response at the catchment scale

    Benjamin Bernhard Manson Mirus;Keith Loague

  • Further testing of the Integrated Hydrology Model (InHM): event-based simulations for a small rangeland catchment located near Chickasha, Oklahoma

    Keith Loague;Christopher S. Heppner;Robert H. Abrams;Adrianne E. Carr

  • Uncertainty of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessments for Agricultural Regions in Hawaii: Review

    Keith Loague;R. L. Bernknopf;R. E. Green;T. W. Giambelluca

  • Near-surface hydrologic response for a steep, unchanneled catchment near Coos Bay, Oregon: 2. Physics-based simulations

    Brian A. Ebel;Keith Loague;Joel E. Vanderkwaak;William E. Dietrich

  • Assessment of Non-Point Source Pollution in the Vadose Zone

    Dennis L. Corwin;Keith M. Loague;Timothy R. Ellsworth

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian A. Ebel
Brian A. Ebel United States Geological Survey
Dennis L. Corwin
Dennis L. Corwin Agricultural Research Service
Benjamin B. Mirus
Benjamin B. Mirus United States Geological Survey
Thomas W. Giambelluca
Thomas W. Giambelluca University of Hawaii at Manoa
David R. Montgomery
David R. Montgomery University of Washington
William E. Dietrich
William E. Dietrich University of California, Berkeley
Suzanne P. Anderson
Suzanne P. Anderson University of Colorado Boulder
Stephanie K. Kampf
Stephanie K. Kampf Colorado State University
Ronaldo I. Borja
Ronaldo I. Borja Stanford University
Edzer Pebesma
Edzer Pebesma University of Münster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways that often complement other fields. Many students explore online degrees to enhance their expertise without disrupting their current roles. For creative professionals interested in integrating environmental themes, exploring an online MFA degree can provide valuable skills in communication and visualization.

Those looking to move into leadership or administrative roles within environmental organizations may benefit from a human resource management masters degree online. This skillset is crucial for managing teams and fostering sustainable workplace environments.

For senior learners seeking efficient educational options, numerous one year degrees for seniors are available. These accelerated programs allow for quick upskilling, perfect for advancing in roles related to Earth Science or transitioning careers.

Additionally, for those focused on data curation or library sciences connected to geosciences, ALA accredited MLIS programs provide specialized training in managing scientific information, which is increasingly vital in research and environmental policy development.

Best Scientists Citing Keith Loague