World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
68
Citations
20117
World Ranking
1116
National Ranking
512

Gregory E. Tucker publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory E. Tucker sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 289 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Gregory E. Tucker D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory E. Tucker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gregory E. Tucker is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a total of 58 and 33 publications respectively recorded in these areas.

Their work focuses on several subfields including Ecology, Atmospheric Science, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. This indicates a broad engagement with both natural and applied aspects of earth system science.

Main research topics covered by Gregory E. Tucker include:

  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Research Data Management Practices

Frequent coauthors associated with their work are:

  • Katherine R. Barnhart
  • Matthew W. Rossi
  • Eric Hutton
  • Benjamin Campforts
  • Irina Overeem

Gregory E. Tucker has contributed to several publication venues repeatedly, including:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
  • HydroShare Resources
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Representative recent papers by this scientist include:

  • Short communication: Landlab v2.0: a software package for Earth surface dynamics, 2020, Earth Surface Dynamics
  • Call for transparency of COVID-19 models, 2020, Science
  • The Basic Model Interface 2.0: A standard interface for coupling numerical models in the geosciences, 2020, The Journal of Open Source Software
  • Inverting Topography for Landscape Evolution Model Process Representation: 1. Conceptualization and Sensitivity Analysis, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
  • Depth-dependent soil mixing persists across climate zones, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Best Publications

  • Dynamics of the stream‐power river incision model: Implications for height limits of mountain ranges, landscape response timescales, and research needs

    Kelin X. Whipple;Gregory E. Tucker

  • Landscape response to tectonic forcing: Digital elevation model analysis of stream profiles in the Mendocino triple junction region, northern California

    Noah P. Snyder;Kelin X. Whipple;Gregory E. Tucker;Dorothy J. Merritts

  • Implications of sediment‐flux‐dependent river incision models for landscape evolution

    Kelin X. Whipple;Gregory E. Tucker

  • Hillslope processes, drainage density, and landscape morphology

    Gregory E. Tucker;Rafael L. Bras

  • Drainage basin responses to climate change

    Gregory E. Tucker;Rudy Slingerland

  • Modelling landscape evolution

    Gregory E. Tucker;Gregory R. Hancock

  • Erosional dynamics, flexural isostasy, and long-lived escarpments: A numerical modeling study

    Gregory E. Tucker;Rudy L. Slingerland

  • Topographic outcomes predicted by stream erosion models: Sensitivity analysis and intermodel comparison

    G. E. Tucker;K. X. Whipple

  • Channel response to tectonic forcing: field analysis of stream morphology and hydrology in the Mendocino triple junction region, northern California

    Noah P Snyder;Kelin X Whipple;Gregory E Tucker;Dorothy J Merritts

  • A stochastic approach to modeling the role of rainfall variability in drainage basin evolution

    Gregory E. Tucker;Rafael L. Bras

  • An object-oriented framework for distributed hydrologic and geomorphic modeling using triangulated irregular networks

    Gregory E. Tucker;Stephen T. Lancaster;Nicole M. Gasparini;Rafael L. Bras

  • The Channel-Hillslope Integrated Landscape Development Model (CHILD)

    Gregory Tucker;Stephen Lancaster;Nicole Gasparini;Rafael Bras

  • Bedrock channel adjustment to tectonic forcing: Implications for predicting river incision rates

    Alexander C. Whittaker;Patience A. Cowie;Mikaël Attal;Gregory E. Tucker

  • Statistical analysis of drainage density from digital terrain data

    Gregory E Tucker;Filippo Catani;Andrea Rinaldo;Rafael L Bras

  • Importance of a stochastic distribution of floods and erosion thresholds in the bedrock river incision problem

    Noah P. Snyder;Kelin X. Whipple;Gregory E. Tucker;Dorothy J. Merritts

  • Drainage basin sensitivity to tectonic and climatic forcing: implications of a stochastic model for the role of entrainment and erosion thresholds

    Gregory E. Tucker

  • Predicting sediment flux from fold and thrust belts

    Gregory E. Tucker;Rudy Slingerland

  • Runoff-generated debris flows: Observations and modeling of surge initiation, magnitude, and frequency

    Jason W. Kean;Scott W. McCoy;Gregory E. Tucker;Dennis M. Staley

  • Statistical treatment of fluvial dose distributions from southern Colorado arroyo deposits

    L.J. Arnold;L.J. Arnold;R.M. Bailey;G.E. Tucker

  • Rock damage and regolith transport by frost: an example of climate modulation of the geomorphology of the critical zone

    Robert S. Anderson;Robert S. Anderson;Suzanne P. Anderson;Suzanne P. Anderson;Gregory E. Tucker;Gregory E. Tucker

  • Creative computing with Landlab: an open-source toolkit for building, coupling, and exploring two-dimensional numerical models of Earth-surface dynamics

    Daniel E. J. Hobley;Daniel E. J. Hobley;Daniel E. J. Hobley;Jordan M. Adams;Sai Siddhartha Nudurupati;Eric W. H. Hutton

Frequent Co-Authors

Erkan Istanbulluoglu
Erkan Istanbulluoglu University of Washington
Rafael L. Bras
Rafael L. Bras Georgia Institute of Technology
Suzanne P. Anderson
Suzanne P. Anderson University of Colorado Boulder
Francis K. Rengers
Francis K. Rengers United States Geological Survey
Kelin X. Whipple
Kelin X. Whipple Arizona State University
Alexander C. Whittaker
Alexander C. Whittaker Imperial College London
Patience A. Cowie
Patience A. Cowie University of Bergen
Gerald P. Roberts
Gerald P. Roberts Birkbeck, University of London
Heather Viles
Heather Viles University of Oxford
Jason W. Kean
Jason W. Kean United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Earth Science opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. Many students complement their studies with degrees in fields like library science, which emphasizes information management and can enhance research skills. Exploring is a library science degree worth it offers useful insights for those considering this route.

Additionally, Earth Science professionals often engage in field documentation and visual analysis, making an online degree in photography a valuable tool to boost both technical and creative skills.

Veterans looking to transition into science careers may find online photography degrees particularly accommodating. To understand how military experience can benefit this path, see online photography degrees for veterans.

For those interested in enhancing communication across diverse populations, a concise language credential like the short spanish degrees provide practical skills that are highly valued in environmental and community outreach roles.

Best Scientists Citing Gregory E. Tucker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles