World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 55 4384 4261 131 130 366 9759

Marcus Foth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcus Foth between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcus Foth published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 18.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2011. 20 of the 487 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2011. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 29 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 32 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 9 publications
2000 2025

487 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcus Foth: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 4
2004 7
2005 5
2006 14
2007 25
2008 27
2009 29
2010 16
2011 32
2012 17
2013 24
2014 28
2015 30
2016 31
2017 27
2018 29
2019 17
2020 21
2021 32
2022 24
2023 26
2024 11
2025 9
Total 487
Download as CSV

Marcus Foth publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Foth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 362–371 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 366 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176 366
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcus Foth D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Foth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500 55
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Marcus Foth is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia. Their research spans the intersection of social sciences and computer science, focusing prominently on human-computer interaction and information systems. They have contributed to several subfields including sociology and political science, media technology, and management of technology and innovation.

The primary topics of study in Marcus Foth's work include innovative human-technology interaction, smart cities and technologies, blockchain technology applications and security, innovative approaches in technology and social development, land use and ecosystem services, cultural industries and urban development, and COVID-19 digital contact tracing.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Marcus Foth are:

  • Peta Mitchell
  • Shoufeng Cao
  • Glenda Amayo Caldwell
  • Warwick Powell
  • Greg Hearn

They have published multiple times in venues such as:

  • Interaction design & architecture(s)/ID&A Interaction design & architecture(s)
  • Journal of Urban Technology
  • Journal of Industrial Information Integration
  • AI & Society
  • Sustainability

Recent scholarly papers include:

  • "Strengthening consumer trust in beef supply chain traceability with a blockchain-based human-machine reconcile mechanism" (2020, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture)
  • "Garbage in garbage out: The precarious link between IoT and blockchain in food supply chains" (2021, Journal of Industrial Information Integration)
  • "Urban AI: understanding the emerging role of artificial intelligence in smart cities" (2022, AI & Society)
  • "BlockSidewalk to Barcelona: Technological sovereignty and the social license to operate smart cities" (2020, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology)
  • "Blockchain smart contracts for supply chain finance: Mapping the innovation potential in Australia-China beef supply chains" (2022, Journal of Industrial Information Integration)

Marcus Foth has also authored books published by Queensland University of Technology, including "DIY & More-than-Human Media Architecture, Allegories, Entanglements & Speculative Practice" (2021) and "Activating Townsville's Creative Underground" (2025).

They have been recognized as an ACM Senior Member since 2016.

Best Publications

  • Can cities become smart without being sustainable? A systematic review of the literature

    Tan Yigitcanlar;Md. Kamruzzaman;Marcus Foth;Jamile Sabatini-Marques

  • Gamification and serious games within the domain of domestic energy consumption: A systematic review

    Daniel Johnson;Ella Horton;Rory Mulcahy;Marcus Foth

  • Urban informatics

    Marcus Foth;Jaz Hee-jeong Choi;Christine Satchell

  • From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen: Urban Informatics, Social Media, Ubiquitous Computing, and Mobile Technology to Support Citizen Engagement

    Marcus Foth;Laura Forlano;Christine Satchell;Martin Gibbs

  • Libraries as coworking spaces: Understanding user motivations and perceived barriers to social learning

    Mark Bilandzic;Marcus Foth

  • Networked Individualism of Urban Residents: Discovering the communicative ecology in inner-city apartment buildings

    Marcus Foth;Greg Hearn

  • Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City

    Marcus Foth

  • Applications and implementations of new media in corporate communications: An action research approach

    Greg Hearn;Marcus Foth;Heather Leona Gray

  • Motivating domestic energy conservation through comparative, community-based feedback in mobile and social media

    Petromil Petkov;Felix Köbler;Marcus Foth;Helmut Krcmar

  • Citizen’s Right to the Digital City

    Marcus Foth;Martin Brynskov;Timo Ojala

  • Digital Storytelling and History Lines: Community Engagement in a Master-Planned Development

    Helen Klaebe;Marcus Foth;Jean Burgess;Mark Bilandzic

  • The Second Life of urban planning? Using NeoGeography tools for community engagement

    Marcus Foth;Bhishna Bajracharya;Ross Brown;Greg Hearn

  • CityFlocks: designing social navigation for urban mobile information systems

    Mark Bilandzic;Marcus Foth;Alexander De Luca

  • People, content, location: sweet spotting urban screens for situated engagement

    Ronald Schroeter;Marcus Foth;Christine Satchell

  • More-than-human participation: design for sustainable smart city futures

    Rachel Clarke;Sara Heitlinger;Ann Light;Laura Forlano

  • Participatory Design and Action Reseach: Identical Twins or Synergetic Pair?

    Marcus Foth;Jeff Axup

  • Strengthening consumer trust in beef supply chain traceability with a blockchain-based human-machine reconcile mechanism

    Shoufeng Cao;Warwick Powell;Marcus Foth;Valeri Natanelov

  • Augmenting public participation: enhancing planning outcomes through the use of social media and web 2.0

    Joel Fredericks;Marcus Foth

  • Action Research in the Design of New Media and ICT Systems

    Gregory N. Hearn;Marcus Foth

  • Participatory urban informatics: towards citizen-ability

    Marcus Foth

  • Extending Australia's digital divide policy: an examination of the value of social inclusion and social capital policy frameworks

    Tanya M. Notley;Marcus Foth

  • Engaging energy saving through motivation-specific social comparison

    Petromil Petkov;Felix Köbler;Marcus Foth;Richard Medland

  • Network action research

    Marcus Foth

  • Citizen's Right to the Digital City: Urban Interfaces, Activism, and Placemaking

    Marcus Foth;Martin Brynskov;Timo Ojala

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Tomitsch
Martin Tomitsch University of Technology Sydney
Andry Rakotonirainy
Andry Rakotonirainy Queensland University of Technology
Margot Brereton
Margot Brereton Queensland University of Technology
Jean Burgess
Jean Burgess Queensland University of Technology
Eric Paulos
Eric Paulos University of California, Berkeley
Carl DiSalvo
Carl DiSalvo Georgia Institute of Technology
Helmut Krcmar
Helmut Krcmar Technical University of Munich
Paul Dourish
Paul Dourish University of California, Irvine
Martin Gibbs
Martin Gibbs University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study can open up flexible and affordable pathways to a computer science career in the USA. Students looking to fast-track their entry to the workforce may consider 1 year associate degree programs online, which provide foundational skills efficiently.

For those seeking a higher credential, enrolling in one of the most useful masters degrees can lead to greater career opportunities and the potential for higher salaries. Master's programs in computer science and related fields are in high demand, particularly in the tech sector.

Budget is a major concern for many learners. Researching the cheapest online college options can help reduce student debt and make advanced education more accessible.

Additionally, students with lower GPAs still have opportunities to pursue their goals. There are online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa, offering a second chance to succeed in computer science and IT.

Whether you are just beginning or seeking to advance your career, online programs provide flexibility and diverse options for every background and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Marcus Foth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles