World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 37 2439 2281 1 1 239 4559

Sergej Hloch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sergej Hloch between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sergej Hloch published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 13.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2013. 24 of the 265 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2013. 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 14 publications
2006 2025

265 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sergej Hloch: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 4
2007 8
2008 12
2009 12
2010 8
2011 22
2012 20
2013 23
2014 10
2015 16
2016 18
2017 10
2018 20
2019 20
2020 9
2021 14
2022 5
2023 10
2024 10
2025 14
Total 265
Download as CSV

Sergej Hloch publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sergej Hloch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 237–246 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 239 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92 239
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Sergej Hloch D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sergej Hloch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127 37
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Sergej Hloch is affiliated with the Technical University of Košice in Slovakia. Their research focuses primarily on engineering and environmental science, with particular attention to subfields such as ecological modeling, mechanical engineering, ocean engineering, computational mechanics, and materials chemistry.

The main topics covered in their work include erosion and abrasive machining, particle dynamics in fluid flows, fluid dynamics and heat transfer, surface treatment and residual stress, high-temperature coating behaviors, advanced surface polishing techniques, and high-velocity impact and material behavior.

Their publication record includes articles in a number of scientific journals, with frequent contributions to the following venues:

  • Wear
  • Materials
  • The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
  • Engineering Science and Technology an International Journal
  • Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering

Recent publications by Sergej Hloch include:

  • Effect of pressure of pulsating water jet moving along stair trajectory on erosion depth, surface morphology and microhardness, 2020, Wear
  • Application of the pulsating and continuous water jet for granite erosion, 2020, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
  • Effects of liquid droplet volume and impact frequency on the integrity of Al alloy AW2014 exposed to subsonic speeds of pulsating water jets, 2021, Wear
  • Utilization of ultrasonically forced pulsating water jet decaying for bone cement removal, 2020, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
  • Surface and Subsurface Analysis of Stainless Steel and Titanium Alloys Exposed to Ultrasonic Pulsating Water Jet, 2021, Materials

Collaborations have been an important part of Hloch's research output. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Akash Nag
  • Alice Chlupová
  • Jakub Poloprudský
  • Dagmar Klichová
  • Amit Rai Dixit

The interdisciplinary nature of Hloch's work encompasses detailed investigations into erosion mechanics and surface interactions driven by fluid dynamics. This is reflected in the strong focus on pulsating water jets and related phenomena impacting materials such as alloys, granite, stainless steel, and titanium.

Their research contributes to understanding how fluid flow and material behavior interact under conditions involving high-velocity impacts, ultrasonic forces, and pulsation effects, relevant in both industrial machining and biomedical applications.

Best Publications

  • Multi response optimization of process parameters based on Taguchi—Fuzzy model for coal cutting by water jet technology

    Vinay Sharma;Somnath Chattopadhyaya;Sergej Hloch

  • Wear Assessment of Conical Pick used in Coal Cutting Operation

    Saurabh Dewangan;Somnath Chattopadhyaya;Sergej Hloch

  • Surface geometric parameters proposal for the advanced control of abrasive waterjet technology

    Jan Valíček;Sergej Hloch;Dražan Kozak

  • Copper alloys disintegration using pulsating water jet

    D. Lehocka;J. Klich;J. Foldyna;S. Hloch

  • Determination of vibration frequency depending on abrasive mass flow rate during abrasive water jet cutting

    Pavol Hreha;Agáta Radvanská;Sergej Hloch;Vincent Peržel

  • Investigation of wear and tool life of coated carbide and cubic boron nitride cutting tools in high speed milling

    Pawel Twardowski;Stanislaw Legutko;Grzegorz M Krolczyk;Sergej Hloch

  • Roughness Parameters Calculation By Means Of On-Line Vibration Monitoring Emerging From AWJ Interaction With Material

    Pavol Hreha;Agata Radvanska;Lucia Knapcikova;Grzegorz M. Królczyk

  • Topographical anomaly on surfaces created by abrasive waterjet

    Sergej Hloch;Jan Valíček

  • Visualisation and measurement of high-speed pulsating and continuous water jets

    M. Zelenak;J. Foldyna;J. Scucka;S. Hloch

  • Ultrasonically generated pulsed water jet peening of austenitic stainless-steel surfaces

    Madhulika Srivastava;Sergej Hloch;Sergej Hloch;Rupam Tripathi;Drazan Kozak

  • Turning of wood plastic composites by water jet and abrasive water jet

    Zuzana Hutyrová;Jiří Ščučka;Sergej Hloch;Petr Hlaváček

  • Residual stress and surface properties of stainless steel welded joints induced by ultrasonic pulsed water jet peening

    Madhulika Srivastava;Sergej Hloch;Lucie Krejci;Somnath Chattopadhyaya

  • Influence of argon pollution on the weld surface morphology

    G. M. Krolczyk;P. Nieslony;J. B. Krolczyk;I. Samardzic

  • Experimental analysis of irregularities of metallic surfaces generated by abrasive waterjet

    Jan Valíček;Milan Držík;Sergej Hloch;Miloslav Ohlídal

  • Hybrid aluminium matrix composite AWJ turning using olivine and Barton garnet

    Akash Nag;Jiří Ščučka;Petr Hlavacek;Dagmar Klichová

  • Surface integrity in tangential turning of hybrid MMC A359/B4C/Al2O3 by abrasive waterjet

    Ashish Kumar Srivastava;Ashish Kumar Srivastava;Akash Nag;Amit Rai Dixit;Sandeep Tiwari

  • Joint strength evaluation of friction stir welded Al-Cu dissimilar alloys

    Sachindra Shankar;Pedro Vilaça;Priyabrat Dash;Somnath Chattopadhyaya

  • Improvement of surface integrity of Nimonic C 263 super alloy produced by WEDM through various post-processing techniques

    Amitava Mandal;Amit Rai Dixit;S. Chattopadhyaya;A. Paramanik

  • Surface integrity and residual stress analysis of pulsed water jet peened stainless steel surfaces

    Madhulika Srivastava;Sergej Hloch;Sergej Hloch;Nenad Gubeljak;Marijana Milkovic

  • An influence of active additives on the formation of selected indicators of the condition of the X10CrNi18-8 stainless steel surface layer in MQCL conditions

    Radoslaw W. Maruda;Stanislaw Legutko;Grzegorz M. Krolczyk;Sergej Hloch

  • Using the acoustic sound pressure level for quality prediction of surfaces created by abrasive waterjet

    Jan Valíček;Sergej Hloch

Frequent Co-Authors

Somnath Chattopadhyaya
Somnath Chattopadhyaya Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad
Amit Rai Dixit
Amit Rai Dixit Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad
Grzegorz Krolczyk
Grzegorz Krolczyk Opole University of Technology
Alokesh Pramanik
Alokesh Pramanik Curtin University
Pedro Vilaça
Pedro Vilaça Aalto University
Piotr Niesłony
Piotr Niesłony Opole University of Technology
Radoslaw W. Maruda
Radoslaw W. Maruda University of Zielona Góra
Himadri Chattopadhyay
Himadri Chattopadhyay Jadavpur University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering open doors to a wide range of related fields and career options, many of which can now be explored through online education. For example, veterans interested in expanding their expertise might consider an online speech pathology bachelor degree for veterans, offering flexible learning tailored to their needs. Though seemingly different, the analytical and problem-solving skills in engineering align well with disciplines like speech pathology.

Students looking for an accelerated path can explore programs similar to the 5 year speech pathology programs, which emphasize streamlined coursework. Accelerated degrees help professionals quickly launch or pivot their careers while maintaining high educational standards.

Career pathways such as law enforcement profiling also intersect with engineering skills, as detailed in "how to become a profiler." Technical knowledge aids investigative roles that require detailed analysis and understanding of complex systems. Learn more about how to become a profiler to see how those skills translate.

Lastly, for those inclined towards psychology or therapeutic roles, exploring the types of therapy degrees available online can offer complementary career options. This flexibility can be valuable for engineers interested in human factors, ergonomics, or occupational health.

Best Scientists Citing Sergej Hloch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles