World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
35
Citations
6017
World Ranking
7308
National Ranking
2462

Emily S. Minor publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily S. Minor sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Emily S. Minor D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily S. Minor sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emily S. Minor is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a total of 39 publications in this main field. Within this broad area, their work spans several subfields, including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis; Ecology; Global and Planetary Change; Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics; and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects related to ecosystems and urban environments. Key areas of focus include Urban Green Space and Health, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Plant and Animal Studies, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Animal and Plant Science Education, Urban Agriculture and Sustainability, and Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation.

Emily S. Minor has collaborated frequently with several coauthors. These include Megan Garfinkel, Christopher J. Whelan, Philip P. Johnson, Sheryl C. Hosler, and Michaël Roberts.

The scientist's recent papers reflect their involvement in topics centered on urban ecosystems, avian ecology, and landscape ecology. Notable recent publications are:

  • Insights into human-wildlife interactions in cities from bird sightings recorded online, 2020, Landscape and Urban Planning
  • Birds suppress pests in corn but release them in soybean crops within a mixed prairie/agriculture system, 2020, Ornithological Applications
  • Connectivity in the Urban Landscape (2015-2020): Who? Where? What? When? Why? and How?, 2022, Current Landscape Ecology Reports
  • Histoecology: Applying Ecological Principles and Approaches to Describe and Predict Tumor Ecosystem Dynamics Across Space and Time, 2020, Cancer Control
  • Using faecal metabarcoding to examine consumption of crop pests and beneficial arthropods in communities of generalist avian insectivores, 2021, Ibis

The scientist has published multiple articles in specific journals. The most frequent publication venues include Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, Landscape and Urban Planning, and Current Landscape Ecology Reports.

Best Publications

  • Graph models of habitat mosaics

    Dean L. Urban;Emily S. Minor;Eric A. Treml;Robert S. Schick

  • The city as a refuge for insect pollinators.

    Damon M. Hall;Gerardo R. Camilo;Rebecca K. Tonietto;Jeff Ollerton

  • A Graph-Theory Framework for Evaluating Landscape Connectivity and Conservation Planning

    Emily S. Minor;Dean L. Urban

  • GRAPH THEORY AS A PROXY FOR SPATIALLY EXPLICIT POPULATION MODELS IN CONSERVATION PLANNING

    Emily S. Minor;Dean L. Urban

  • Urban residents' perceptions of birds in the neighborhood: Biodiversity, cultural ecosystem services, and disservices

    J. Amy Belaire;J. Amy Belaire;Lynne M. Westphal;Christopher J. Whelan;Emily S. Minor

  • Effects of habitat structure, human disturbance, and habitat connectivity on urban forest bird communities

    Wanmo Kang;Wanmo Kang;Emily S. Minor;Chan Ryul Park;Dowon Lee

  • Diversity of wild bees supports pollination services in an urbanized landscape

    David M. Lowenstein;Kevin C. Matteson;Kevin C. Matteson;Emily S. Minor

  • Humans, bees, and pollination services in the city: the case of Chicago, IL (USA)

    David M. Lowenstein;Kevin C. Matteson;Kevin C. Matteson;Iyan Xiao;Alexandra M. Silva

  • Vacant lots: An underexplored resource for ecological and social benefits in cities

    Elsa C. Anderson;Emily S. Minor

  • Direct and indirect effects of land use on floral resources and flower‐visiting insects across an urban landscape

    K.C. Matteson;James B. Grace;E.S. Minor

  • Having our yards and sharing them too: the collective effects of yards on native bird species in an urban landscape.

    J. Amy Belaire;Christopher J. Whelan;Emily S. Minor

  • A Multiscale Network Analysis of Protected-Area Connectivity for Mammals in the United States

    Emily S. Minor;Todd R. Lookingbill

  • Exploring the effects of green infrastructure placement on neighborhood-level flooding via spatially explicit simulations

    Moira L. Zellner;Dean Massey;Emily Minor;Miquel A. Gonzalez-Meler

  • Evaluating the dependence of urban pollinators on ornamental, non-native, and ‘weedy’ floral resources

    David M. Lowenstein;David M. Lowenstein;Kevin C. Matteson;Emily S. Minor

  • The role of landscape connectivity in assembling exotic plant communities: a network analysis.

    Emily S. Minor;Samantha M. Tessel;Katharina A. M. Engelhardt;Todd R. Lookingbill

  • Forest bird communities across a gradient of urban development

    Emily Minor;Emily Minor;Dean Urban

  • Yards increase forest connectivity in urban landscapes

    Alessandro Ossola;Dexter Locke;Brenda Lin;Emily Minor

  • Different social drivers, including perceptions of urban wildlife, explain the ecological resources in residential landscapes

    J. Amy Belaire;J. Amy Belaire;Lynne M. Westphal;Emily S. Minor

  • Combined vegetation volume and “greenness” affect urban air temperature

    Amélie Y. Davis;Amélie Y. Davis;Jinha Jung;Jinha Jung;Bryan C. Pijanowski;Emily S. Minor

  • Enhancing pollination supply in an urban ecosystem through landscape modifications

    Amélie Y. Davis;Amélie Y. Davis;Eric V. Lonsdorf;Cliff R. Shierk;Kevin C. Matteson

  • Landscape connectivity and seed dispersal characteristics inform the best management strategy for exotic plants

    Emily S. Minor;Robert H. Gardner

Frequent Co-Authors

Dean L. Urban
Dean L. Urban Duke University
Christopher J. Whelan
Christopher J. Whelan University of Illinois at Chicago
Eric A. Treml
Eric A. Treml Australian Institute of Marine Science
Brenda B. Lin
Brenda B. Lin Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Robert I. McDonald
Robert I. McDonald The Nature Conservancy
Stephen Pruett-Jones
Stephen Pruett-Jones University of Chicago
Miquel A. Gonzalez-Meler
Miquel A. Gonzalez-Meler University of Illinois at Chicago
Bryan C. Pijanowski
Bryan C. Pijanowski Purdue University West Lafayette
Mick E. Hanley
Mick E. Hanley Plymouth University
Alexander R. A. Anderson
Alexander R. A. Anderson Moffitt Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can significantly expand your career options in Ecology and Evolution. Many students consider healthcare fields, including nursing, due to their focus on environmental health and public education. For instance, those interested in a quick transition to nursing may benefit from online direct entry msn programs. These programs are designed for non-nurses aiming for a master’s in nursing, offering flexibility and speed.

If you're evaluating value and quality, it helps to compare the best value nursing education online wgu pathway with other reputable institutions. Finding affordable options is essential, especially for those looking at bridge programs like bsn to msn online programs that seamlessly connect undergraduate and graduate study.

When selecting an online degree, accreditation and nonprofit status are crucial for ensuring high academic standards. Reviewing the non profit online universities can help you find trusted schools with reputable programs in both nursing and environmental sciences. Taking time to research all related programs will empower you to align your passion for ecology and evolution with in-demand career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Emily S. Minor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles