World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
11477
World Ranking
6945
National Ranking
255

Brenda B. Lin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda B. Lin sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 93 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Brenda B. Lin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda B. Lin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brenda B. Lin is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on environmental science, agricultural and biological sciences, and medicine.

Their work includes numerous publications in various scientific venues, with frequent contributions to the Journal of Vascular Surgery, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Urban Ecosystems, SSRN Electronic Journal, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

The scientist's research covers several main topics including urban green space and health, urban agriculture and sustainability, land use and ecosystem services, plant and animal studies, urban heat island mitigation, peripheral artery disease management, and sustainability and climate change governance.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Brenda B. Lin are:

  • Integrating solutions to adapt cities for climate change, 2021, The Lancet Planetary Health
  • Life satisfaction linked to the diversity of nature experiences and nature views from the window, 2020, Landscape and Urban Planning
  • Urban agriculture as a nature-based solution to address socio-ecological challenges in Australian cities, 2021, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
  • Gardening can relieve human stress and boost nature connection during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2022, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
  • The relationship between pollinator community and pollination services is mediated by floral abundance in urban landscapes, 2020, Urban Ecosystems

Brenda B. Lin frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Monika Egerer, Heidi Liere, Shalene Jha, Alessandro Ossola, and Stacy M. Philpott. These collaborations reflect interdisciplinary approaches within their research areas.

Their work is detailed across various subfields such as health, toxicology and mutagenesis, plant science, global and planetary change, surgery, and ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics.

Best Publications

  • Resilience in Agriculture through Crop Diversification: Adaptive Management for Environmental Change

    Brenda B. Lin

  • Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa.

    Dan F. B. Flynn;Melanie Gogol-Prokurat;Theresa Nogeire;Nicole Molinari

  • Health Benefits from Nature Experiences Depend on Dose

    Danielle F. Shanahan;Robert Bush;Kevin J. Gaston;Brenda B. Lin

  • The future of urban agriculture and biodiversity-ecosystem services: Challenges and next steps

    Brenda B. Lin;Stacy M. Philpott;Shalene Jha

  • Agroforestry management as an adaptive strategy against potential microclimate extremes in coffee agriculture

    Brenda B. Lin

  • The Health Benefits of Urban Nature: How Much Do We Need?

    Danielle F. Shanahan;Richard A. Fuller;Robert Bush;Brenda B. Lin

  • Opportunity or Orientation? Who Uses Urban Parks and Why

    Brenda B. Lin;Richard A. Fuller;Robert Bush;Kevin J. Gaston

  • The role of agroforestry in reducing water loss through soil evaporation and crop transpiration in coffee agroecosystems

    Brenda B. Lin

  • Toward Improved Public Health Outcomes From Urban Nature

    Danielle F. Shanahan;Brenda B. Lin;Robert Bush;Kevin J. Gaston

  • Understanding the potential loss and inequities of green space distribution with urban densification

    Brenda Lin;Jacqui Meyers;Guy Barnett

  • Synergies between Agricultural Intensification and Climate Change Could Create Surprising Vulnerabilities for Crops

    Brenda B. Lin;Ivette Perfecto;John Vandermeer

  • FORUM: Sharing or sparing? How should we grow the world's cities?

    Brenda B. Lin;Richard A. Fuller;Richard A. Fuller

  • A multi-scale assessment of hurricane impacts on agricultural landscapes based on land use and topographic features

    Stacy M. Philpott;Brenda B. Lin;Shalene Jha;Shannon J. Brines

  • Socio-economic inequalities in access to nature on public and private lands: A case study from Brisbane, Australia

    Danielle Shanahan;Brenda Lin;Kevin Gaston;Robert Bush

  • Is Nature Relatedness Associated with Better Mental and Physical Health

    Julie H. Dean;Danielle F. Shanahan;Robert Bush;Kevin J. Gaston

  • The Benefits of Natural Environments for Physical Activity

    Danielle F. Shanahan;Lara Franco;Brenda B. Lin;Kevin J. Gaston

  • What is the role of trees and remnant vegetation in attracting people to urban parks

    Danielle Shanahan;Brenda Lin;Kevin Gaston;Robert Bush

  • Integrating solutions to adapt cities for climate change

    Brenda B Lin;Alessandro Ossola;Alessandro Ossola;Alessandro Ossola;Marina Alberti;Erik Andersson;Erik Andersson

  • How green is your garden?: Urban form and socio-demographic factors influence yard vegetation, visitation, and ecosystem service benefits

    B. B. Lin;K. J. Gaston;R. A. Fuller;D. Wu

  • Effects of industrial agriculture on climate change and the mitigation potential of small-scale agro-ecological farms

    B. B. Lin

  • Variation in experiences of nature across gradients of tree cover in compact and sprawling cities

    Danielle F. Shanahan;Daniel T.C. Cox;R. A. Fuller;S Hancock

  • Life satisfaction linked to the diversity of nature experiences and nature views from the window

    Chia-chen Chang;Rachel Rui Ying Oh;Thi Phuong Le Nghiem;Yuchen Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Fuller
Richard A. Fuller University of Queensland
Kevin J. Gaston
Kevin J. Gaston University of Exeter
Stacy M. Philpott
Stacy M. Philpott University of California, Santa Cruz
Shalene Jha
Shalene Jha The University of Texas at Austin
Dave Kendal
Dave Kendal University of Melbourne
Peter Bichier
Peter Bichier University of California, Santa Cruz
Emily S. Minor
Emily S. Minor University of Illinois at Chicago
Caragh G. Threlfall
Caragh G. Threlfall Macquarie University
John Vandermeer
John Vandermeer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degree programs can broaden career opportunities. Many beginners find that choosing one of the easiest bachelor degree to get helps them build a strong foundation while balancing study with other commitments.

Specializing further, pursuing a geologist degree online offers practical insights into earth processes and resource management—key skills for environmental scientists focused on sustainability.

Another valuable path is the study of geographic data through top-tier graduate programs. The best gis graduate programs teach mapping and spatial analysis, essential for environmental planning and conservation efforts.

To develop leadership and policy skills relevant to environmental governance, students may also consider advanced degrees like the best online mpa. This program prepares graduates for public administration roles that impact environmental decision-making.

Best Scientists Citing Brenda B. Lin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles