World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
10293
World Ranking
8411
National Ranking
841

Freda Newcombe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Freda Newcombe sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Freda Newcombe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Freda Newcombe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Freda Newcombe is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. They have an academic profile oriented toward research and scholarship within this institution.

While detailed records of their recent papers, frequent co-authors, and main fields or subfields of study are not available, the association with a major research university suggests engagement with academic research activities.

The absence of listed publication venues, book publications, and recognized awards indicates that there is limited publicly accessible data on specific outputs or formal recognitions in their career at this time.

This profile reflects the currently available data, focusing on the factual elements of affiliation and professional identity without interpretation or extrapolation.

Best Publications

  • Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach

    John C. Marshall;Freda Newcombe

  • Missile wounds of the brain: a study of psychological deficits

    Freda Newcombe

  • Syntactic and semantic errors in paralexia

    John C. Marshall;Freda Newcombe

  • Face recognition without awareness

    Edward H. F. de Haan;Andy Young;Freda Newcombe

  • Aspects of face processing

    Hadyn D. Ellis;Malcolm A. Jeeves;Freda Newcombe;Andy Young

  • Face perception after brain injury: selective impairments affecting identity and expression.

    Andrew W. Young;Freda Newcombe;Edward H. F. de Haan;Marian small

  • Impairment of auditory perception and language comprehension in dysphasia

    Paula Tallal;Freda Newcombe

  • Dissociated visual perceptual and spatial deficits in focal lesions of the right hemisphere

    Freda Newcombe;W. Ritchie Russell

  • Handedness, speech lateralization and ability.

    Freda Newcombe;Graham Ratcliff

  • Dissociable visual and spatial impairments following right posterior cerebral lesions: Clinical, neuropsychological and anatomical evidence

    F. Newcombe;G. Ratcliff;H. Damasio

  • Faces interfere with name classification in a prosopagnosic patient.

    Edward H.F. De Haan;Andy Young;Freda Newcombe

  • Measuring the duration of post traumatic amnesia.

    L. A. Fortuny;M. Briggs;F. Newcombe;G. Ratcliff

  • On psycholinguistic classifications of the acquired dyslexias

    Freda Newcombe;John C. Marshall

  • COVERT AND OVERT RECOGNITION IN PROSOPAGNOSIA

    E. H. F. De Haan;A. W. Young;F. Newcombe

  • Selective loss of imagery in a case of visual agnosia.

    Ziyah Mehta;Freda Newcombe;Edward De Haan

  • Chromatic Discrimination in a Cortically Colour Blind Observer

    Charles A. Heywood;Alan Cowey;F. Newcombe

  • A Left Hemisphere Contribution to Visuospatial Processing

    Ziyah Mehta;Freda Newcombe;Hanna Damasio

  • Spatial orientation in man: effects of left, right, and bilateral posterior cerebral lesions.

    Graham Ratcliff;Freda Newcombe

  • Minor head injury: pathophysiological or iatrogenic sequelae?

    F Newcombe;P Rabbitt;M Briggs

  • HIGHER CORTICAL FUNCTIONS IN MAN

    Freda Newcombe

  • Patterns of Paralexia: A Psycholinguistic Approach

    J. C. Marshall

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew W. Young
Andrew W. Young University of York
Edward H.F. de Haan
Edward H.F. de Haan Radboud University
John C. Marshall
John C. Marshall University of Toronto
John C. Marshall
John C. Marshall University of Oxford
Charles A. Heywood
Charles A. Heywood Durham University
Paula Tallal
Paula Tallal Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Alan Cowey
Alan Cowey University of Oxford
Alan D. Baddeley
Alan D. Baddeley University of York
Hanna Damasio
Hanna Damasio University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up many rewarding career options, with Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT) being a particularly popular pathway. Many universities now offer online psychology and counseling degrees that can help you meet licensure requirements in your state.

If you’re interested in learning how to become an mft in Bakersfield, you’ll find that local requirements often align with broader national standards, but always be sure to review regional specifics. Those in the East Coast may be curious about how to become an mft in Baltimore, which outlines Maryland’s certification process.

Key steps include earning a graduate degree, accumulating supervised clinical hours, and passing state licensing exams. For instance, if you want clarity on Boise mft certification requirements, researching Idaho-specific guidelines is crucial. Similarly, Boston-based students can discover how to become a marriage and family therapist in Boston to ensure they meet all Massachusetts prerequisites.

As the field grows, online psychology degrees make it easier to pursue these paths—allowing you to balance studies with work or family commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Freda Newcombe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles