World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elizabeth K. Warrington

Elizabeth K. Warrington

Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
107
Citations
48216
World Ranking
1008
National Ranking
98

Psychology

D-Index
107
Citations
46940
World Ranking
446
National Ranking
64

Elizabeth K. Warrington publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth K. Warrington sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 313 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Elizabeth K. Warrington D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth K. Warrington sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 1986 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom

Overview

Elizabeth K. Warrington is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Throughout their academic career, they have contributed to research that aligns with their institutional association, maintaining active involvement in their field.

In recognition of professional achievements, Elizabeth K. Warrington was made a Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom, in 1986.

Best Publications

  • Category specific semantic impairments

    Elizabeth K. Warrington;T. Shallice

  • The selective impairment of semantic memory

    E. K. Warrington

  • Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation.

    L. Weiskrantz;Elizabeth K. Warrington;M. D. Sanders;J. Marshall

  • Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration.

    Elizabeth K. Warrington;Rosaleen A. Mccarthy

  • Amnesia and the distinction between long- and short-term memory.

    A.D. Baddeley;Elizabeth K. Warrington

  • Cognitive Neuropsychology: A Clinical Introduction

    Rosaleen A. McCarthy;Elizabeth K. Warrington

  • Amnesic syndrome: consolidation or retrieval?

    Elizabeth K. Warrington;L. Weiskrantz

  • CATEGORY SPECIFIC ACCESS DYSPHASIA

    Elizabeth K. Warrington;Rosaleen Mccarthy

  • Presymptomatic hippocampal atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. A longitudinal MRI study.

    N. C. Fox;E. K. Warrington;P. A. Freeborough;P. Hartikainen

  • NEW METHOD OF TESTING LONG-TERM RETENTION WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AMNESIC PATIENTS

    Elizabeth K. Warrington;L. Weiskrantz

  • The effect of prior learning on subsequent retention in amnesic patients

    Elizabeth K. Warrington;L. Weiskrantz

  • The selective impairment of auditory verbal short-term memory

    Elizabeth K. Warrington;T. Shallice

  • WORD-FORM DYSLEXIA

    Elizabeth K. Warrington;Tim Shallice

  • The Contribution of the Right Parietal Lobe to Object Recognition

    Elizabeth K. Warrington;Angela M. Taylor

  • Amnesia a disconnection syndrome

    Elizabeth K. Warrington;L. Weiskrantz

  • Memory disorder in Korsakoff's psychosis: a neuropathological and neuropsychological investigation of two cases.

    W. G. P. Mair;E. K. Warrington;L. Weiskrantz

  • Two categorical stages of object recognition.

    Elizabeth K Warrington;Angela M Taylor

  • Frontotemporal dementia with the C9ORF72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion: clinical, neuroanatomical and neuropathological features

    Colin J. Mahoney;Jon Beck;Jonathan D. Rohrer;Tammaryn Lashley

  • Evidence for modality-specific meaning systems in the brain

    Rosaleen A. McCarthy;E. K. Warrington

  • The fractionation of arithmetical skills: a single case study.

    Elizabeth K. Warrington

  • Category specific semantic impairments

    E. K. Warrington

Frequent Co-Authors

Rosaleen A. McCarthy
Rosaleen A. McCarthy University of Cambridge
Sebastian J. Crutch
Sebastian J. Crutch University College London
Martin N. Rossor
Martin N. Rossor University College London
Nick C. Fox
Nick C. Fox University College London
Lawrence Weiskrantz
Lawrence Weiskrantz University of Oxford
Lisa Cipolotti
Lisa Cipolotti University College London
Tim Shallice
Tim Shallice University College London
Jonathan M. Schott
Jonathan M. Schott University College London
Jason D. Warren
Jason D. Warren University College London
Dawn Langdon
Dawn Langdon Royal Holloway University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and fulfilling career pathways, including social work, counseling, and human services. Many students look for affordable education options to reduce the burden of tuition costs while maximizing career flexibility.

If you’re interested in complementing your psychology studies or pursuing an alternative path, consider programs in social work. There are several affordable programs available across the country. For example, you can explore the cheapest social work degrees in Massachusetts or find information on the cheapest social work programs in Madison.

Similarly, other regions offer accessible options such as affordable social work degrees in Marion and the cheapest social work degrees in Maryland. These programs often provide online and flexible learning formats to help students balance education with work and family commitments.

Graduates can look forward to diverse opportunities in mental health, school counseling, clinical practice, and case management. Choosing an affordable pathway not only reduces financial barriers but also helps build a strong foundation for a rewarding career supporting others.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth K. Warrington

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles