World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 83 15364 14449 1409 1345 362 41325

Peter Goldstraw publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Goldstraw between 1973 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Goldstraw published across 49 years, from 1973 to 2021, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2007. 3 of the 362 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2007. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 15 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 15 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 21 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 31 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication
1973 2021

362 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Goldstraw: publications per year, 1973 to 2021
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 0
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 5
1985 6
1986 3
1987 15
1988 4
1989 7
1990 6
1991 5
1992 16
1993 5
1994 17
1995 8
1996 5
1997 15
1998 3
1999 13
2000 15
2001 6
2002 10
2003 21
2004 13
2005 17
2006 12
2007 31
2008 20
2009 20
2010 16
2011 10
2012 4
2013 6
2014 5
2015 4
2016 5
2017 3
2018 2
2019 0
2020 2
2021 1
Total 362
Download as CSV

Peter Goldstraw publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Goldstraw sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 362 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 362
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Goldstraw D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Goldstraw sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 83
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Goldstraw is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with specific attention to subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, and Surgery.

Their academic output includes multiple publications, notably in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology, where their recent work has been published. Key papers authored or co-authored by Peter Goldstraw include:

  • Complete Resection in Lung Cancer Surgery: From Definition to Validation and Beyond (2020) in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Commemorating the Silver Anniversary of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer International Workshop on Intrathoracic Staging (2021) in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Their research covers a range of topics associated with lung cancer and related diseases, including:

  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment

Peter Goldstraw frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Ramón Rami-Porta
  • Christian Wittekind
  • Hisao Asamura

Their work has contributed to understanding various aspects of lung cancer surgery, staging, and treatment, with a consistent presence in specialized oncology literature. Their involvement in studies related to intrathoracic staging reflects a focus on clinical approaches to thoracic oncology research.

Best Publications

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer.

    Peter Goldstraw;Kari Chansky;John Crowley;Ramon Rami-Porta

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours.

    Peter Goldstraw;John Crowley;Kari Chansky;Dorothy J. Giroux

  • Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes

    Christopher Greenman;Philip Stephens;Raffaella Smith;Gillian L. Dalgliesh

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for the Revisions of the T Descriptors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

    Ramón Rami-Porta;David Ball;John Crowley;Dorothy J. Giroux

  • The IASLC lung cancer staging project: A proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer

    Valerie W. Rusch;Hisao Asamura;Hirokazu Watanabe;Dorothy J. Giroux

  • Non-small-cell lung cancer

    Peter Goldstraw;David Ball;James R Jett;Thierry Le Chevalier

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: validation of the proposals for revision of the T, N, and M descriptors and consequent stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours.

    Patti A. Groome;Vanessa Bolejack;John J. Crowley;Catherine Kennedy

  • The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming 8th Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

    Hisao Asamura;Kari Chansky;John Crowley;Peter Goldstraw

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Coding T Categories for Subsolid Nodules and Assessment of Tumor Size in Part-Solid Tumors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer

    William D. Travis;Hisao Asamura;Alexander A. Bankier;Mary Beth Beasley

  • The international association for the study of lung cancer lung cancer staging project: Proposals regarding the clinical staging of small cell lung cancer in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the tumor, node, metastasis classification for lung cancer

    Frances A. Shepherd;John J. Crowley;Paul Van Houtte;Pieter E. Postmus

  • Management of malignant pleural effusions.

    V.B. Antony;R. Loddenkemper;P. Astoul;C. Boutin

  • Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and its association with survival after complete resection in non-small cell lung cancer.

    Khaled M. Sarraf;Elizabeth Belcher;Evgeny Raevsky;Andrew G. Nicholson

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals regarding the relevance of TNM in the pathologic staging of small cell lung cancer in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer.

    Eric Vallières;Frances A. Shepherd;John J. Crowley;Paul Van Houtte

  • The revised TNM staging system for lung cancer.

    Ramon Rami-Porta;John J. Crowley;Peter Goldstraw

  • IASLC肺癌病期分類プロジェクト:肺癌TNM分類次版(第7版)におけるT desriptor修正の提案

    Rami-Porta R;Ball D;Crowley J;Giroux Dj

  • Cancer of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction: An Eighth Edition Staging Primer.

    Thomas W. Rice;Hemant Ishwaran;Mark K. Ferguson;Eugene H. Blackstone

  • Complete resection in lung cancer surgery: proposed definition

    Ramón Rami-Porta;Christian Wittekind;Peter Goldstraw

  • Effect of lung-volume-reduction surgery in patients with severe emphysema.

    Duncan Geddes;Michael Davies;Hiroshi Koyama;David Hansell

  • The international association for the study of lung cancer staging project: Prognostic factors and pathologic TNM stage in surgically managed non-small cell lung cancer

    Kari Chansky;Jean Paul Sculier;John J. Crowley;Dori Giroux

  • Bronchoscopic volume reduction with valve implants in patients with severe emphysema.

    Tudor P Toma;Nicholas S Hopkinson;James Hillier;David M Hansell

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew G. Nicholson
Andrew G. Nicholson Royal Brompton Hospital
John Crowley
John Crowley Washington University in St. Louis
Ugo Pastorino
Ugo Pastorino University of Milan
Valerie W. Rusch
Valerie W. Rusch Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Hisao Asamura
Hisao Asamura Keio University
Michael I. Polkey
Michael I. Polkey National Institutes of Health
William D. Travis
William D. Travis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
David M. Hansell
David M. Hansell National Institutes of Health
Mary N. Sheppard
Mary N. Sheppard St George's, University of London
Duncan M. Geddes
Duncan M. Geddes Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a pathway in medicine, a variety of related online degrees can help you advance or pivot your career. Many registered nurses can now consider rn to bsn programs no clinicals, designed for flexibility and eliminating the need for in-person clinical work. These programs are ideal for working professionals looking to enhance their credentials quickly.

For those aiming to achieve the highest levels in nursing, pursuing a doctorate is more accessible than ever. DNP programs online offer accelerated formats, enabling nurses to complete advanced degrees in less time. Some may be especially appealing, such as online dnp programs without dissertation, which streamline the process and focus on practical skills rather than heavy research projects.

For those just starting out, entering healthcare can be quick with options like the fastest lpn program, equipping learners with essential nursing skills in a matter of months. No matter your career stage, online healthcare programs can offer flexibility and a direct route to new opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Goldstraw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles