World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
41325
World Ranking
15365
National Ranking
1412

Peter Goldstraw publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Goldstraw sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 362 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Goldstraw D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Goldstraw sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Goldstraw is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with specific attention to subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, and Surgery.

Their academic output includes multiple publications, notably in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology, where their recent work has been published. Key papers authored or co-authored by Peter Goldstraw include:

  • Complete Resection in Lung Cancer Surgery: From Definition to Validation and Beyond (2020) in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Commemorating the Silver Anniversary of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer International Workshop on Intrathoracic Staging (2021) in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Their research covers a range of topics associated with lung cancer and related diseases, including:

  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment

Peter Goldstraw frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Ramón Rami-Porta
  • Christian Wittekind
  • Hisao Asamura

Their work has contributed to understanding various aspects of lung cancer surgery, staging, and treatment, with a consistent presence in specialized oncology literature. Their involvement in studies related to intrathoracic staging reflects a focus on clinical approaches to thoracic oncology research.

Best Publications

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer.

    Peter Goldstraw;Kari Chansky;John Crowley;Ramon Rami-Porta

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours.

    Peter Goldstraw;John Crowley;Kari Chansky;Dorothy J. Giroux

  • Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes

    Christopher Greenman;Philip Stephens;Raffaella Smith;Gillian L. Dalgliesh

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for the Revisions of the T Descriptors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

    Ramón Rami-Porta;David Ball;John Crowley;Dorothy J. Giroux

  • The IASLC lung cancer staging project: A proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer

    Valerie W. Rusch;Hisao Asamura;Hirokazu Watanabe;Dorothy J. Giroux

  • Non-small-cell lung cancer

    Peter Goldstraw;David Ball;James R Jett;Thierry Le Chevalier

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: validation of the proposals for revision of the T, N, and M descriptors and consequent stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours.

    Patti A. Groome;Vanessa Bolejack;John J. Crowley;Catherine Kennedy

  • The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming 8th Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

    Hisao Asamura;Kari Chansky;John Crowley;Peter Goldstraw

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Coding T Categories for Subsolid Nodules and Assessment of Tumor Size in Part-Solid Tumors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer

    William D. Travis;Hisao Asamura;Alexander A. Bankier;Mary Beth Beasley

  • The international association for the study of lung cancer lung cancer staging project: Proposals regarding the clinical staging of small cell lung cancer in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the tumor, node, metastasis classification for lung cancer

    Frances A. Shepherd;John J. Crowley;Paul Van Houtte;Pieter E. Postmus

  • Management of malignant pleural effusions.

    V.B. Antony;R. Loddenkemper;P. Astoul;C. Boutin

  • Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and its association with survival after complete resection in non-small cell lung cancer.

    Khaled M. Sarraf;Elizabeth Belcher;Evgeny Raevsky;Andrew G. Nicholson

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals regarding the relevance of TNM in the pathologic staging of small cell lung cancer in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer.

    Eric Vallières;Frances A. Shepherd;John J. Crowley;Paul Van Houtte

  • The revised TNM staging system for lung cancer.

    Ramon Rami-Porta;John J. Crowley;Peter Goldstraw

  • IASLC肺癌病期分類プロジェクト:肺癌TNM分類次版(第7版)におけるT desriptor修正の提案

    Rami-Porta R;Ball D;Crowley J;Giroux Dj

  • Cancer of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction: An Eighth Edition Staging Primer.

    Thomas W. Rice;Hemant Ishwaran;Mark K. Ferguson;Eugene H. Blackstone

  • Complete resection in lung cancer surgery: proposed definition

    Ramón Rami-Porta;Christian Wittekind;Peter Goldstraw

  • Effect of lung-volume-reduction surgery in patients with severe emphysema.

    Duncan Geddes;Michael Davies;Hiroshi Koyama;David Hansell

  • The international association for the study of lung cancer staging project: Prognostic factors and pathologic TNM stage in surgically managed non-small cell lung cancer

    Kari Chansky;Jean Paul Sculier;John J. Crowley;Dori Giroux

  • Bronchoscopic volume reduction with valve implants in patients with severe emphysema.

    Tudor P Toma;Nicholas S Hopkinson;James Hillier;David M Hansell

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew G. Nicholson
Andrew G. Nicholson Royal Brompton Hospital
John Crowley
John Crowley Washington University in St. Louis
Ugo Pastorino
Ugo Pastorino University of Milan
Valerie W. Rusch
Valerie W. Rusch Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Hisao Asamura
Hisao Asamura Keio University
Michael I. Polkey
Michael I. Polkey National Institutes of Health
William D. Travis
William D. Travis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
David M. Hansell
David M. Hansell National Institutes of Health
Mary N. Sheppard
Mary N. Sheppard St George's, University of London
Duncan M. Geddes
Duncan M. Geddes Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a pathway in medicine, a variety of related online degrees can help you advance or pivot your career. Many registered nurses can now consider rn to bsn programs no clinicals, designed for flexibility and eliminating the need for in-person clinical work. These programs are ideal for working professionals looking to enhance their credentials quickly.

For those aiming to achieve the highest levels in nursing, pursuing a doctorate is more accessible than ever. DNP programs online offer accelerated formats, enabling nurses to complete advanced degrees in less time. Some may be especially appealing, such as online dnp programs without dissertation, which streamline the process and focus on practical skills rather than heavy research projects.

For those just starting out, entering healthcare can be quick with options like the fastest lpn program, equipping learners with essential nursing skills in a matter of months. No matter your career stage, online healthcare programs can offer flexibility and a direct route to new opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Goldstraw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles