World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 72 2081 1890 233 217 248 16937
Neuroscience 72 2318 2118 231 210 272 17199

Lisa Cipolotti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa Cipolotti between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa Cipolotti published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2010. 5 of the 284 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2010. 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1987 2025

284 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa Cipolotti: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 3
1988 3
1989 2
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 3
1994 3
1995 8
1996 5
1997 1
1998 5
1999 6
2000 7
2001 9
2002 8
2003 7
2004 10
2005 15
2006 16
2007 12
2008 8
2009 7
2010 19
2011 7
2012 7
2013 10
2014 7
2015 10
2016 5
2017 13
2018 13
2019 9
2020 13
2021 11
2022 7
2023 7
2024 2
2025 3
Total 284
Download as CSV

Lisa Cipolotti publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Cipolotti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 248 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 248
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa Cipolotti D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Cipolotti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 72
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Lisa Cipolotti is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans Medicine and Neuroscience, with a significant focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Neurology.

The scientist has contributed to multiple research topics, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Selected recent publications by Lisa Cipolotti include:

  • Factors contributing to the distress, concerns, and needs of UK Neuroscience health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
  • Graph lesion-deficit mapping of fluid intelligence, 2022, Brain

The scientist's frequent coauthors are:

  • Edgar Chan
  • J Mole
  • Jennifer A. Foley
  • Parashkev Nachev
  • David J. Werring

Lisa Cipolotti has published in multiple venues frequently, such as:

  • Journal of Neurology
  • Brain
  • Cortex
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Brain Communications

Recognized as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom, Lisa Cipolotti's work covers interdisciplinary aspects of neuroscience and medicine, particularly relating to cognitive and neurological disorders.

Best Publications

  • Human cingulate cortex and autonomic control: converging neuroimaging and clinical evidence

    Hugo D. Critchley;Christopher J. Mathias;Oliver Josephs;John O'Doherty

  • Impaired social response reversal. A case of 'acquired sociopathy'.

    R. J. R. Blair;L. Cipolotti

  • Patterns of temporal lobe atrophy in semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease

    Dennis Chan;Nick C. Fox;Rachael I. Scahill;William R. Crum

  • Cognitive dysfunction in patients with cerebral microbleeds on T2*-weighted gradient-echo MRI

    David J Werring;Duncan W Frazer;Lucy J Coward;Nick A Losseff

  • The hippocampus is required for short-term topographical memory in humans

    Tom Hartley;Chris M. Bird;Dennis Chan;Lisa Cipolotti

  • A SPECIFIC DEFICIT FOR NUMBERS IN A CASE OF DENSE ACALCULIA

    Lisa Cipolotti;Brian Butterworth;Gianfranco Denes

  • The differing roles of the frontal cortex in fluency tests.

    Gail Robinson;Tim Shallice;Tim Shallice;Marco Bozzali;Lisa Cipolotti;Lisa Cipolotti

  • Toward a multiroute model of number processing: Impaired number transcoding with preserved calculation skills.

    Lisa Cipolotti;Brian Butterworth

  • Long-term retrograde amnesia… the crucial role of the hippocampus

    Lisa Cipolotti;Tim Shallice;Tim Shallice;Dennis Chan;Nick Fox

  • Dynamic aphasia: an inability to select between competing verbal responses?

    Gail Robinson;James Blair;Lisa Cipolotti

  • Evidence of multiple memory systems in the human brain. A [18F]FDG PET metabolic study.

    D. Perani;S. Bressi;S. F. Cappa;G. Vallar

  • Taking both sides: do unilateral anterior temporal lobe lesions disrupt semantic memory?

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Lisa Cipolotti;Lisa Cipolotti;Facundo Manes;Karalyn Patterson

  • Semantic memory and reading abilities: a case report.

    Lisa Cipolotti;Elizabeth K. Warrington

  • Word comprehension. The distinction between refractory and storage impairments.

    Elizabeth K. Warrington;Lisa Cipolotti

  • Fractionation of visual memory: agency detection and its impairment in autism.

    R J R Blair;U Frith;N Smith;F Abell

  • Bipolar I and bipolar II disorder: cognition and emotion processing.

    Mary Summers;Kyriaki Papadopoulou;Stefania Bruno;Lisa Cipolotti

  • A volumetric study of hippocampus and amygdala in depressed patients with subjective memory problems

    Armin von Gunten;Nicholas C. Fox;Lisa Cipolotti;Maria A. Ron

  • Cerebral microbleeds and vascular cognitive impairment

    David J. Werring;Simone M. Gregoire;Lisa Cipolotti;Lisa Cipolotti

  • Confabulation: damage to a specific inferior medial prefrontal system.

    Martha S. Turner;Lisa Cipolotti;Tarek A. Yousry;Tim Shallice

  • Enhancing memory performance with rTMS in healthy subjects and individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment: the role of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

    Patrizia Turriziani;Daniela Smirni;Giuseppe Zappalà;Giuseppa R. Mangano

  • Semantic memory and reading abilities: a case report

    L. Cipolotti

Frequent Co-Authors

Tim Shallice
Tim Shallice University College London
Martin N. Rossor
Martin N. Rossor University College London
David J. Werring
David J. Werring University College London
Massimiliano Oliveri
Massimiliano Oliveri University of Palermo
Nick C. Fox
Nick C. Fox University College London
Marco Bozzali
Marco Bozzali Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Sarah E. MacPherson
Sarah E. MacPherson University of Edinburgh
Claudia A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott
Claudia A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott University College London
Elizabeth K. Warrington
Elizabeth K. Warrington University College London
Tarek A. Yousry
Tarek A. Yousry University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to various careers, including social work. Many online programs can prepare you for these roles, but degree and licensing requirements vary by location. For instance, the Georgia education requirements for social workers specify at least a Bachelor of Social Work (BSW) for entry-level positions, while advanced roles require a Master of Social Work (MSW).

In contrast, the Hawaii minimum degree requirement for social workers also emphasizes the MSW for clinical roles, highlighting the importance of graduate degrees for advancement. States like Idaho have their own Idaho education requirements for social workers, often requiring additional supervised experience.

Illinois offers various pathways, but the social worker degree requirements in Illinois stress accredited programs for licensing. When selecting an online degree, consider your state’s guidelines and future specialization areas to best align your education with career goals in psychology and social work.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa Cipolotti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles