What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira mainly focuses on Aedes aegypti, Virology, Vector, Dengue fever and Aedes albopictus.
His Aedes aegypti research is included under the broader classification of Ecology.
Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira has researched Ecology in several fields, including Biological dispersal and Anopheles.
The Virology study which covers Culex quinquefasciatus that intersects with VENEREAL TRANSMISSION and Viral load.
The various areas that Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira examines in his Vector study include Veterinary medicine and Anopheles darlingi.
As a part of the same scientific study, he usually deals with the Aedes albopictus, concentrating on Genotype and frequently concerns with Arbovirus, Autochthonous Transmission and Virus transmission.
His most cited work include:
- Differential Susceptibilities of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from the Americas to Zika Virus. (431 citations)
- High Level of Vector Competence of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from Ten American Countries as a Crucial Factor in the Spread of Chikungunya Virus (250 citations)
- High Level of Vector Competence of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from Ten American Countries as a Crucial Factor in the Spread of Chikungunya Virus (250 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira mainly investigates Virology, Aedes aegypti, Zoology, Ecology and Vector.
Virus, Outbreak, Zika virus, Chikungunya and Yellow fever are the core of his Virology study.
His Aedes aegypti research integrates issues from Veterinary medicine and Dengue fever, Aedes.
His Zoology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Plasmodium and Larva.
His Ecology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Biological dispersal and Anopheles.
His Vector study combines topics in areas such as Arbovirus, Culex and Enzootic.
He most often published in these fields:
- Virology (38.71%)
- Aedes aegypti (38.17%)
- Zoology (30.11%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Virology (38.71%)
- Outbreak (19.89%)
- Aedes aegypti (38.17%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Virology, Outbreak, Aedes aegypti, Yellow fever and Zika virus.
His study brings together the fields of Genome and Virology.
His Outbreak study incorporates themes from Veterinary medicine, Malaria and Environmental health.
His primary area of study in Aedes aegypti is in the field of Aedes albopictus.
His Yellow fever research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Zoology, Phylogeography, Flavivirus and Epizootic.
His study in Zika virus is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Vector, Viral load, Microcephaly, Culex quinquefasciatus and Culex.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Potential risk of re-emergence of urban transmission of Yellow Fever virus in Brazil facilitated by competent Aedes populations. (108 citations)
- Outbreak of human malaria caused by Plasmodium simium in the Atlantic Forest in Rio de Janeiro: a molecular epidemiological investigation. (84 citations)
- Yellow fever outbreak in Brazil: the puzzle of rapid viral spread and challenges for immunisation. (68 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Virology, Outbreak, Yellow fever, Aedes aegypti and Virus.
His Virology and Zika virus and Enzootic investigations all form part of his Virology research activities.
His studies deal with areas such as Transmission, Microcephaly, Culex quinquefasciatus and Dengue fever as well as Zika virus.
The concepts of his Outbreak study are interwoven with issues in Phylogeography, Genotype and Environmental health.
His work in Yellow fever tackles topics such as Zoology which are related to areas like Aedes.
Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira combines subjects such as Sylvatic cycle and Vector with his study of Aedes aegypti.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
