World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carol O'Sullivan

Carol O'Sullivan

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5781
World Ranking
11226
National Ranking
42

Carol O'Sullivan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol O'Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 196 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Carol O'Sullivan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol O'Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carol O'Sullivan is affiliated with Trinity College Dublin in Ireland and specializes in the field of Computer Science, with a particular focus on subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Plant Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Control and Systems Engineering.

Their research spans various interconnected topics, including:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Human Motion and Animation
  • Video Analysis and Summarization

Recent publications reflect a strong interest in augmented and mixed reality technologies applied to food and agriculture, as well as cognitive aspects related to aging and gaming. Key recent papers include:

  • "Augmented/mixed reality technologies for food: A review," 2022, Trends in Food Science & Technology
  • "Trends of Augmented Reality for Agri-Food Applications," 2022, Sensors
  • "Real-Time Detection of Strawberry Ripeness Using Augmented Reality and Deep Learning," 2023, Sensors
  • ""CityQuest," A Custom-Designed Serious Game, Enhances Spatial Memory Performance in Older Adults," 2022, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • "Real-Time Detection of Strawberry Ripeness Using Augmented Reality and Deep Learning," 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal

Collaboration is a notable component of their work, involving co-authors such as Jackey J. K. Chai, Jun-Li Xu, Goksu Yamac, Mirela Oštrek, and Xiaohan Sun. These partnerships have contributed to research output in multiple venues.

Their work is frequently published in specialized journals and archives, with multiple papers appearing in arXiv (Cornell University), Sensors, and other domain-focused publications such as Trends in Food Science & Technology and Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Geometric skinning with approximate dual quaternion blending

    Ladislav Kavan;Steven Collins;Jiří Žára;Carol O'Sullivan

  • Skinning with dual quaternions

    Ladislav Kavan;Steven Collins;Jiří Žára;Carol O'Sullivan

  • Adaptive medial-axis approximation for sphere-tree construction

    Gareth Bradshaw;Carol O'Sullivan

  • Geopostors: a real-time geometry / impostor crowd rendering system

    Simon Dobbyn;John Hamill;Keith O'Conor;Carol O'Sullivan

  • Clone attack! Perception of crowd variety

    Rachel McDonnell;Michéal Larkin;Simon Dobbyn;Steven Collins

  • Collisions and perception

    Carol O'Sullivan;John Dingliana

  • Sphere-tree construction using dynamic medial axis approximation

    Gareth Bradshaw;Carol O'Sullivan

  • Fast and Efficient Skinning of Animated Meshes

    Ladislav Kavan;Ladislav Kavan;Peter-Pike J. Sloan;Carol O'Sullivan

  • Evaluating the visual fidelity of physically based animations

    Carol O'Sullivan;John Dingliana;Thanh Giang;Mary K. Kaiser

  • Perceptually Adaptive Graphics

    Carol O’Sullivan;Sarah Howlett;Rachel McDonnell;Yann Morvan

  • BucketTree: Improving Collision Detection Between Deformable Objects

    Fabio Ganovelli;John Dingliana;Carol O’Sullivan

  • Dual Quaternions for Rigid Transformation Blending

    L Kavan;Steven Collins;C O'Sullivan;J Zara

  • Levels of Detail for Crowds and Groups.

    Carol O'Sullivan;Justine Cassell;Hannes Högni Vilhjálmsson;John Dingliana

  • Augmented/mixed reality technologies for food: A review

    Unknown

  • Creature features: online motion puppetry for non-human characters

    Yeongho Seol;Carol O'Sullivan;Jehee Lee

  • Bottom-up visual attention for virtual human animation

    C. Peters;C. O'Sullivan

  • Real-time Collision Detection and Response using Sphere-trees

    Carol O'sullivan;John Dingliana

  • Graceful Degradation of Collision Handling in Physically Based Animation

    John Dingliana;Carol O'Sullivan

  • Eye-catching crowds: saliency based selective variation

    Rachel McDonnell;Michéal Larkin;Benjamín Hernández;Isaac Rudomin

  • The saliency of anomalies in animated human characters

    Jessica Hodgins;Sophie Jörg;Carol O'Sullivan;Sang Il Park

  • Synthetic Vision and Memory for Autonomous Virtual Humans

    Christopher Peters;Carol Ann O'sullivan

  • Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on Computer animation

    Carol O'Sullivan;Fred Pighin

Frequent Co-Authors

Fiona N. Newell
Fiona N. Newell Trinity College Dublin
Ladislav Kavan
Ladislav Kavan University of Utah
Jessica K. Hodgins
Jessica K. Hodgins Carnegie Mellon University
Jehee Lee
Jehee Lee Seoul National University
Jonas Beskow
Jonas Beskow Royal Institute of Technology
Marie-Paule Cani
Marie-Paule Cani École Polytechnique
Pádraig Cunningham
Pádraig Cunningham University College Dublin
Holly Rushmeier
Holly Rushmeier Yale University
Justine Cassell
Justine Cassell Carnegie Mellon University
Diego Gutierrez
Diego Gutierrez University of Zaragoza

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science doesn’t have to mean a traditional campus experience. Today, a variety of associates degree online programs offer a flexible and affordable springboard into technology fields. These can help you build foundational skills before advancing to a bachelor’s or master’s degree.

For those considering graduate education, focusing on the most useful masters degrees in demand can open doors to specialized and high-paying careers. Fields like artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and software engineering are especially sought after in the job market.

Budget is another critical factor. Many students are searching for the cheapest online college options to minimize student debt while still achieving a respected qualification. It’s important to compare tuition, fees, and potential scholarship opportunities when making a decision.

If your academic record isn’t perfect, there’s still hope. Many online colleges that accept low gpa can help you get started or continue your journey in computer science. With determination and the right support, these programs provide a second chance for a rewarding tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Carol O'Sullivan

Trending Scientists