World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
85
Citations
30436
World Ranking
1181
National Ranking
137

Neuroscience

D-Index
90
Citations
31444
World Ranking
1106
National Ranking
124

John C. Marshall publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Marshall sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 371 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John C. Marshall D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Marshall sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John C. Marshall was affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom and contributed extensively to medical research throughout their career. Their work predominantly focused on medicine, with significant attention to fields such as epidemiology, infectious diseases, critical care and intensive care medicine, immunology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their research covered key topics that included:

  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Immune Response and Inflammation

John C. Marshall had numerous frequent co-authors during their career, collaborating often with:

  • Srinivas Murthy
  • François Lamontagne
  • Claúdia C. dos Santos
  • Yaseen M. Arabi
  • Patrick R. Lawler

Their publications appeared most frequently in several key venues, including:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • BMJ Open
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Trials

Among their recent notable papers, they authored:

  • A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research (2020), published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • Prevalence and Outcomes of Infection Among Patients in Intensive Care Units in 2017 (2020), published in JAMA
  • Biomarkers of sepsis: time for a reappraisal (2020), published in Critical Care
  • The REMAP-CAP (Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform for Community-acquired Pneumonia) Study. Rationale and Design (2020), published in Annals of the American Thoracic Society
  • Redefining critical illness (2022), published in Nature Medicine

John C. Marshall also contributed to book publications. One such work is Neutrophil Death Regulation in Critical Illness, published in 2023 by Frontiers Media.

Best Publications

  • Multi-infarct dementia. A cause of mental deterioration in the elderly.

    V.C. Hachinski;N.A. Lassen;J. Marshall

  • Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach

    John C. Marshall;Freda Newcombe

  • Deep dyslexia since 1980.

    Max Coltheart;Karalyn Patterson;John C. Marshall

  • THE SKIN SENSES

    John Marshall

  • Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees

    G. R. Fink;P. W. Halligan;J. C. Marshall;C. D. Frith

  • Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect

    Peter W. Halligan;Gereon R. Fink;John C. Marshall;Giuseppe Vallar

  • Left neglect for near but not far space in man

    Peter W. Halligan;John C. Marshall

  • Surface dyslexia: neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading

    K. E. Patterson;J. C. Marshall;M. Coltheart

  • The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses

    Gereon R. Fink;John C. Marshall;Peter W. Halligan;Chris D. Frith

  • Blindsight and insight in visuo-spatial neglect

    John C. Marshall;Peter W. Halligan

  • Syntactic and semantic errors in paralexia

    John C. Marshall;Freda Newcombe

  • The functional anatomy of a hysterical paralysis

    John C Marshall;Peter W Halligan;Gereon R Fink;Derick T Wade

  • Using fMRI to decompose the neural processes underlying the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

    Chuh-Hyoun Lie;Karsten Specht;John C. Marshall;Gereon R. Fink

  • Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli.

    Gereon R. Fink;Peter W. Halligan;John C. Marshall;Chris D. Frith

  • Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI

    G. R. Fink;J. C. Marshall;N. J. Shah;P. H. Weiss

  • Analysis of neural mechanisms underlying verbal fluency in cytoarchitectonically defined stereotaxic space--the roles of Brodmann areas 44 and 45.

    Katrin Amunts;Peter H. Weiss;Peter H. Weiss;Hartmut Mohlberg;Peter Pieperhoff

  • VISUOSPATIAL NEGLECT: UNDERLYING FACTORS AND TEST SENSITIVITY

    P.W. Halligan;J.C. Marshall;D.T. Wade

  • Lateralized cognitive processes and lateralized task control in the human brain

    Klaas E. Stephan;John C. Marshall;Karl J. Friston;James B. Rowe

  • The neural correlates of person familiarity. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study with clinical implications.

    Nadim J. Shah;John C. Marshall;Oliver Zafiris;Anna Schwab

  • FUNDAMENTAL IMPORTANCE OF ARTERIAL OXYGEN CONTENT IN THE REGULATION OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW IN MAN

    Martin M. Brown;J. P. H. Wade;John Marshall

  • This is psychology

    John C. Marshall

  • Patterns of Paralexia: A Psycholinguistic Approach

    J. C. Marshall

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter W. Halligan
Peter W. Halligan Cardiff University
Gereon R. Fink
Gereon R. Fink University of Cologne
Karl Zilles
Karl Zilles Forschungszentrum Jülich
Peter H. Weiss
Peter H. Weiss Forschungszentrum Jülich
Derick T Wade
Derick T Wade Oxford Brookes University
Freda Newcombe
Freda Newcombe University of Oxford
Raymond J. Dolan
Raymond J. Dolan University College London
Gordon L. Clark
Gordon L. Clark University of Oxford
Katrin Amunts
Katrin Amunts Forschungszentrum Jülich
Richard E. Passingham
Richard E. Passingham University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience can open the door to diverse opportunities, whether you aim for a clinical, research, or technology-driven career. For students who want to finish their education quickly, accelerated online programs offer flexible and efficient routes to a neuroscience degree from reputable institutions.

When considering a career in neuroscience or related fields, it’s wise to look into the best bachelor degrees to get and how these align with your long-term goals. Some graduates choose complementary majors that rank among the most profitable majors, maximizing earning potential while pursuing their interests in the brain and behavior.

Affordability is also key for many prospective students. Fortunately, several colleges online that accept fafsa make it possible to access financial aid, reducing the burden of educational expenses. Exploring these pathways can help you tailor your neuroscience education to your career ambitions and financial needs.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Marshall

Recently Published Articles