World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4260 3939 2368 2140 117 9685

Cynthia S. Pomerleau publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cynthia S. Pomerleau between 1975 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cynthia S. Pomerleau published across 44 years, from 1975 to 2018, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2003. 2 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2003. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 7 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 11 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications
1975 2018

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cynthia S. Pomerleau: publications per year, 1975 to 2018
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 5
1988 1
1989 7
1990 5
1991 5
1992 6
1993 4
1994 9
1995 2
1996 4
1997 4
1998 3
1999 2
2000 6
2001 5
2002 1
2003 11
2004 6
2005 6
2006 2
2007 5
2008 7
2009 5
2010 1
2011 1
2012 0
2013 0
2014 1
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 2
Total 123
Download as CSV

Cynthia S. Pomerleau publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cynthia S. Pomerleau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 117
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cynthia S. Pomerleau D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cynthia S. Pomerleau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Cynthia S. Pomerleau is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research areas focus primarily on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with additional work in neuroscience. The subfields they contribute to include molecular biology and sensory systems.

The main topics addressed in their research encompass:

  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies

One recent paper authored in 2020 is titled "Association of a single nucleotide polymorphism in neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha 5 (CHRNA5) with smoking status and with 'pleasurable buzz' during early experimentation with smoking", published in UNC Libraries.

Throughout their work, Cynthia S. Pomerleau has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Richard Sherva
  • Kirk C. Wilhelmsen
  • Scott Chasse
  • John P. Rice
  • Sandy M. Snedecor

The primary venues for publication include:

  • UNC Libraries

Recognition of Cynthia S. Pomerleau's contributions includes being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in the year 2000.

Best Publications

  • Reliability of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire and the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence.

    Cynthia S. Pomerleau;Solange M. Carton;Mary L. Lutzke;Karen A. Flessland

  • Neuroregulators and the reinforcement of smoking: Towards a biobehavioral explanation

    Ovide F. Pomerleau;Ovide F. Pomerleau;Cynthia S. Pomerleau

  • Cigarette smoking in adult patients diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

    Ovide F. Pomerleau;Karen K. Downey;Fred W. Stelson;Cynthia S. Pomerleau

  • Web-based smoking-cessation programs: results of a randomized trial.

    Victor J. Strecher;Jennifer B. McClure;Gwen L. Alexander;Bibhas Chakraborty

  • The Role of Engagement in a Tailored Web-Based Smoking Cessation Program: Randomized Controlled Trial

    Victor J Strecher;Jennifer A McClure;Gwen Alexander;Bibhas Chakraborty

  • Why some people smoke and others do not: new perspectives

    Ovide F. Pomerleau;Allan C. Collins;Saul Shiffman;Cynthia S. Pomerleau

  • The effects of a psychological stressor on cigarette smoking and subsequent behavioral and physiological responses.

    Cynthia S. Pomerleau;Ovide F. Pomerleau

  • Nicotine metabolite ratio as a predictor of cigarette consumption.

    Neal L. Benowitz;Ovide F. Pomerleau;Cynthia S. Pomerleau;Peyton Jacob

  • Differential prevalence of cigarette smoking in patients with schizophrenic vs mood disorders

    Aparna Diwan;Michael Castine;Cynthia S. Pomerleau;James H. Meador-Woodruff

  • Characterizing concerns about post-cessation weight gain: results from a national survey of women smokers.

    Cynthia S. Pomerleau;Alyssa N. Zucker;Abigail J. Stewart

  • Association of a single nucleotide polymorphism in neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha 5 (CHRNA5) with smoking status and with 'pleasurable buzz' during early experimentation with smoking

    Richard Sherva;Kirk Wilhelmsen;Cynthia S. Pomerleau;Scott A. Chasse

  • Research on stress and smoking: progress and problems.

    Ovide F. Pomerleau;Cynthia S. Pomerleau

  • Euphoriant effects of nicotine in smokers

    Cynthia S. Pomerleau;Ovide F. Pomerleau

  • Early experiences with tobacco among women smokers, ex-smokers, and never-smokers.

    Ovide F. Pomerleau;Cynthia S. Pomerleau;Rebecca J. Namenek

  • Relationship of Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire scores and smoking variables in female and male smokers.

    Cynthia S. Pomerleau;Ovide F. Pomerleau;Karen A. Flessland;Susan M. Basson

  • Who gets what symptom? Effects of psychiatric cofactors and nicotine dependence on patterns of smoking withdrawal symptomatology.

    Cynthia S. Pomerleau;Judith L. Marks;Ovide F. Pomerleau

  • Nicotine dependence and withdrawal in alcoholic and nonalcoholic ever-smokers

    Judith L. Marks;Elizabeth M. Hill;Cynthia S. Pomerleau;Sharon A. Mudd

  • Nicotine dependence, depression, and gender: characterizing phenotypes based on withdrawal discomfort, response to smoking, and ability to abstain.

    Ovide F. Pomerleau;Cynthia S. Pomerleau;Ann M. Mehringer;Sandy M. Snedecor

  • Relationship between nicotine tolerance questionnaire scores and plasma cotinine

    Cynthia S. Pomerleau;Ovide F. Pomerleau;Mark J. Majchrzak;Deborah D. Kloska

  • Co‐factors for smoking and evolutionary psychobiology

    Cynthia S. Pomerleau

  • Nicotine Replacement : A Critical Evaluation

    Ovide F. Pomerleau;Cynthia Stodola Pomerleau

Frequent Co-Authors

Ovide F. Pomerleau
Ovide F. Pomerleau University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Abigail J. Stewart
Abigail J. Stewart University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Sharon L.R. Kardia
Sharon L.R. Kardia University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jed E. Rose
Jed E. Rose Duke University
Oliver G. Cameron
Oliver G. Cameron University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Scott A. Langenecker
Scott A. Langenecker University of Utah
Mark A. Lumley
Mark A. Lumley Wayne State University
Gary E. Swan
Gary E. Swan Stanford University
Carol J. Boyd
Carol J. Boyd University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bruno Giordani
Bruno Giordani University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens a variety of career pathways, with many aspiring professionals choosing online degrees for their flexibility. For those interested in therapy roles, becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT) is a popular option. Each state has its own certification and educational requirements which can influence your study and career plans.

If you are looking at Glendale mft certification requirements, you’ll find that supervised clinical experience and a graduate degree are essential. For those wondering how to become a marriage and family therapist in Greensboro, the process typically involves earning a master’s in counseling or a related field, passing a national exam, and meeting state-specific guidelines.

Similarly, those examining mft requirements in Henderson or exploring how to become a marriage and family therapist in Honolulu will need to consider both academic coursework and personal attributes like empathy and communication skills. Choosing the right online program can help you meet these requirements and launch a successful, rewarding career in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Cynthia S. Pomerleau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles