World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
43214
World Ranking
18233
National Ranking
9093

Sanjay Kaul publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanjay Kaul sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 272 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Sanjay Kaul D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanjay Kaul sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sanjay Kaul is affiliated with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, focusing primarily on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research spans 88 publications in medicine, with significant work in subfields that include cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, surgery, statistics and probability, and epidemiology.

The scientist's main research topics include diabetes treatment and management, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, statistical methods in clinical trials, cardiovascular function and risk factors, infective endocarditis diagnosis and management, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, and heart failure treatment and management.

Sanjay Kaul has published notable papers such as:

  • Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Thermal performance of the building envelope integrated with phase change material for thermal energy storage: an updated review., 2022, Sustainable Cities and Society
  • Recommendations for Statistical Reporting in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Special Report From the American Heart Association, 2021, Circulation
  • Impact of Finerenone-Induced Albuminuria Reduction on Chronic Kidney Disease Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes, 2023, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Safety and Efficacy of Empagliflozin and Diuretic Use in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction, 2023, JAMA Cardiology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kaul include:

  • John Mandrola
  • Fabio Barili
  • James M. Brophy
  • Amédéo Anselmi
  • Alessandro Parolari

The scientist's work is frequently published in certain key venues, among them:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • Diabetes Care
  • JAMA Cardiology

Best Publications

  • From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II.

    Morteza Naghavi;Peter Libby;Erling Falk;S. Ward Casscells;S. Ward Casscells

  • Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials A Consensus Report From the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium

    Roxana Mehran;Sunil V. Rao;Deepak L. Bhatt;C. Michael Gibson

  • Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure

    M. Packer;S. D. Anker;J. Butler;G. Filippatos

  • 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS Expert Consensus Document on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    David R. Holmes;Michael J. Mack;Sanjay Kaul;Arvind Agnihotri

  • ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Toll-Like Receptor-4 Is Expressed by Macrophages in Murine and Human Lipid-Rich Atherosclerotic Plaques and Upregulated by Oxidized LDL

    Xiaoou Helen Xu;Prediman K. Shah;Emmanuelle Faure;Ozlem Equils

  • From Vulnerable Plaque to Vulnerable Patient—Part III: Executive Summary of the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force Report

    Morteza Naghavi;Erling Falk;Harvey S. Hecht;Michael J. Jamieson

  • ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 Expert Consensus Document on Reducing the Gastrointestinal Risks of Antiplatelet Therapy and NSAID Use: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents

    Deepak L. Bhatt;James Scheiman;Neena S. Abraham;Elliott M. Antman

  • Use of sildenafil (Viagra) in patients with cardiovascular disease

    Melvin D. Cheitlin;Adolph M. Hutter;Ralph G. Brindis

  • Management of sexual dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease: recommendations of the Princeton Consensus Panel.

    Robert DeBusk;Yaacov Drory;Irwin Goldstein;Graham Jackson

  • ACCF/ACG/AHA 2010 expert consensus document on the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and thienopyridines: A focused update of the ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    Neena S. Abraham;Mark A. Hlatky;Elliott M. Antman;Deepak L. Bhatt

  • ACC/AHA expert consensus document. Use of sildenafil (Viagra) in patients with cardiovascular disease. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association.

    Cheitlin;Hutter Am;Brindis Rg;Ganz P

  • 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the Management of Adults With Aortic Stenosis: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents

    Catherine M. Otto;Dharam J. Kumbhani;Karen P. Alexander;John H. Calhoon

  • High-dose recombinant apolipoprotein A-I(milano) mobilizes tissue cholesterol and rapidly reduces plaque lipid and macrophage content in apolipoprotein e-deficient mice. Potential implications for acute plaque stabilization.

    Prediman K. Shah;Juliana Yano;Odette Reyes;Kuang-Yuh Chyu

  • ACCF 2012 expert consensus document on practical clinical considerations in the interpretation of troponin elevations: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation task force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

    L. Kristin Newby;Robert L. Jesse;Joseph D. Babb;Robert H. Christenson

  • ACCF/AHA Clopidogrel Clinical Alert: Approaches to the FDA “Boxed Warning”

    David R. Holmes;Gregory J. Dehmer;Sanjay Kaul;Dana Leifer

  • Exploiting the Vascular Protective Effects of High-Density Lipoprotein and Its Apolipoproteins An Idea Whose Time for Testing Is Coming, Part I

    Prediman K. Shah;Sanjay Kaul;Jan Nilsson;Bojan Cercek

  • American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

    Thomas M Bashore;Eric R Bates;Peter B Berger;David A Clark

  • ACCF/AHA Clopidogrel Clinical Alert: Approaches to the FDA “Boxed Warning” A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association

    David R. Holmes;Gregory J. Dehmer;Sanjay Kaul;Dana Leifer

  • Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography.

    George A Diamond;Sanjay Kaul

Frequent Co-Authors

George A. Diamond
George A. Diamond Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Prediman K. Shah
Prediman K. Shah Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Michael C. Fishbein
Michael C. Fishbein University of California, Los Angeles
Debabrata Mukherjee
Debabrata Mukherjee Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Jan Nilsson
Jan Nilsson Lund University
Robert A. Harrington
Robert A. Harrington Cornell University
Eric R. Bates
Eric R. Bates University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Deepak L. Bhatt
Deepak L. Bhatt Mount Sinai Hospital
Mark A. Hlatky
Mark A. Hlatky Stanford University
Harlan M. Krumholz
Harlan M. Krumholz Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The pathway to a medical career in the USA does not always follow a single route. Many healthcare professionals are now taking advantage of flexible rn to bsn online with no clinicals programs, helping working nurses earn a bachelor’s degree without the challenge of onsite clinical requirements. This option is ideal for advancing your knowledge while balancing work commitments.

For those wanting to step into advanced practice roles, specialized rn to np bridge programs are increasingly popular. These pathways allow registered nurses to progress to nurse practitioner credentials through online study, broadening career prospects in patient care and management roles.

Healthcare career options extend beyond nursing. If you’re interested in promoting wellness and preventative care, earning a nutritionist online degree can prepare you for roles in community health, food policy, or private practice. It's a growing field with high demand for evidence-based expertise.

Regardless of your interest, ensure your chosen program meets strict educational standards. Look for which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme? Accreditation by the Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Management Education (CAHME) ensures your degree is both reputable and widely respected.

Best Scientists Citing Sanjay Kaul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles