World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
28887
World Ranking
19287
National Ranking
9607

George A. Diamond publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George A. Diamond sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 308 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

George A. Diamond D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George A. Diamond sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Distinguished Service Award, American College of Cardiology (ACC)

Overview

George A. Diamond was affiliated with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in the United States. Throughout their career, Diamond focused on research within the medical field, though specific main or subfields of study are not documented in the available data. Similarly, details regarding precise research topics, frequent co-authors, or publication venues remain unrecorded.

Diamond's scholarly output does not include publicly listed recent papers or book publications in the available source data. Therefore, no comprehensive list of published work or contributions to specific journals or conferences can be provided.

During their career, Diamond received recognition in the form of the Distinguished Service Award from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) in 2004. The nature and citation for this award are not detailed in the record.

George A. Diamond is recorded as deceased. The information available focuses primarily on their affiliation and award, with limited accessible data on detailed aspects of their research contributions or academic collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Analysis of Probability as an Aid in the Clinical Diagnosis of Coronary-Artery Disease

    George A. Diamond;James S. Forrester

  • Catheterization of the Heart in Man with Use of a Flow-Directed Balloon-Tipped Catheter

    H. J. C. Swan;William Ganz;James Forrester;Harold Marcus

  • Incremental Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography for the Prediction of Cardiac Death Differential Stratification for Risk of Cardiac Death and Myocardial Infarction

    Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Leslee J. Shaw;Hosen Kiat;Hosen Kiat

  • Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease : Incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification

    Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Hosen Kiat;Ishac Cohen

  • Medical Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction by Application of Hemodynamic Subsets

    James S. Forrester;George Diamond;Kanu Chatterjee;H. J. C. Swan

  • Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: a basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.

    Daniel S. Berman;Rory Hachamovitch;Hosen Kiat;Ishac Cohen

  • Thermodilution cardiac output determination with a single flow-directed catheter.

    James S. Forrester;William Ganz;George Diamond;Thomas McHugh

  • Correlative classification of clinical and hemodynamic function after acute myocardial infarction

    James S. Forrester;George A. Diamond;H.J.C. Swan

  • Extent and severity of myocardial hypoperfusion as predictors of prognosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

    Marc L. Ladenheim;Brad H. Pollock;Alan Rozanski;Daniel S. Berman

  • Coronary artery calcium evaluation by electron beam computed tomography and its relation to new cardiovascular events

    Nathan D Wong;Jeffrey C Hsu;Robert C Detrano;George Diamond

  • ACCF 2012 expert consensus document on practical clinical considerations in the interpretation of troponin elevations: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation task force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

    L. Kristin Newby;Robert L. Jesse;Joseph D. Babb;Robert H. Christenson

  • A clinically relevant classification of chest discomfort.

    George A. Diamond

  • Effect of coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction on left ventricular compliance in man.

    George Diamond;James S. Forrester

  • Medical therapy of acute myocardial infarction by application of hemodynamic subsets (second of two parts).

    J S Forrester;G Diamond;K Chatterjee;H J Swan

  • Trial and Error: How to Avoid Commonly Encountered Limitations of Published Clinical Trials

    Sanjay Kaul;George A. Diamond

  • Uncertain Effects of Rosiglitazone on the Risk for Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Death

    George A. Diamond;Leon Bax;Sanjay Kaul

  • The Declining Specificity of Exercise Radionuclide Ventriculography

    Alan Rozanski;George A. Diamond;Daniel Berman;James S. Forrester

  • Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography.

    George A Diamond;Sanjay Kaul

  • What the Tortoise Said to Achilles

    George A. Diamond;George A. Diamond;Sanjay Kaul;Sanjay Kaul

  • Thermodilution cardiac output determination with a single flow-directed catheter

    James S. Forrester;William Ganza;George Diamond;Thomas Mc Hugh

Frequent Co-Authors

Sanjay Kaul
Sanjay Kaul Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
James S. Forrester
James S. Forrester Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
H.J.C. Swan
H.J.C. Swan University of California, Los Angeles
Prediman K. Shah
Prediman K. Shah Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
John D. Friedman
John D. Friedman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Robert Detrano
Robert Detrano University of California, Irvine
Guido Germano
Guido Germano Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
William W. Parmley
William W. Parmley University of California, San Francisco
Michael R. Freeman
Michael R. Freeman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn't have to follow a single track. For those interested in flexible or alternative routes, there are many online healthcare degree pathways to consider. If you're already a registered nurse, enrolling in the cheapest rn to bsn program can be a cost-effective way to advance your credentials and open up more career opportunities.

For individuals without a nursing background, direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online offer a fast-track entry point to advanced nursing roles. These programs are designed for those seeking a career change into healthcare without starting from scratch.

Prospective nurses looking for accessible admissions may benefit from attending the easiest bsn program to get into. These schools may have more flexible entry requirements, helping more students embark on their nursing journeys.

Not all healthcare roles require direct patient care. Those interested in the administrative side of healthcare might consider accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid. These programs can provide a valuable skill set and support for those seeking financial assistance.

Best Scientists Citing George A. Diamond

Recently Published Articles