World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
31180
World Ranking
10904
National Ranking
5608

William W. Parmley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William W. Parmley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 527 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William W. Parmley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William W. Parmley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

William W. Parmley is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their academic profile shows involvement in the medical research community, demonstrated by membership in the Association of American Physicians.

While specific publications, co-authors, and topics of research are not detailed, Parmley's professional recognition includes being named a Member of the Association of American Physicians. This membership indicates participation in a professional organization dedicated to advancing scientific knowledge and clinical practice in medicine.

The absence of detailed data on papers, fields of study, subfields, and main research topics limits the ability to outline particular scientific contributions or areas of expertise.

This profile reflects the available factual information without speculation or extrapolation beyond the verified source data.

Best Publications

  • A Calcium Antagonist vs a Non-Calcium Antagonist Hypertension Treatment Strategy for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Carl J. Pepine;Eileen M. Handberg;Rhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff;Ronald G. Marks

  • Passive smoking and heart disease. Epidemiology, physiology, and biochemistry.

    S A Glantz;W W Parmley

  • Left ventricular volume from paired biplane two-dimensional echocardiography.

    N B Schiller;H Acquatella;T A Ports;D Drew

  • Passive smoking and heart disease. Mechanisms and risk.

    Stanton A. Glantz;William W. Parmley

  • Effects of vesnarinone on morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure

    Arthur M. Feldman;Michael R. Bristow;William W. Parmley;Peter E. Carson

  • Factors which affect the diastolic pressure-volume curve.

    S A Glantz;W W Parmley

  • The influence of left ventricular filling pressure on atrial contribution to cardiac output

    Barry Greenberg;Kanu Chatterjee;William W Parmley;Jeffrey A Werner

  • Predictors of Neurocardiogenic Injury After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

    Poyee P Tung;Alexander Kopelnik;Nader Banki;Ken Ong

  • Interstudy reproducibility of dimensional and functional measurements between cine magnetic resonance studies in the morphologically abnormal left ventricle.

    Richard C. Semelka;Ernesto Tomei;Stefan Wagner;John Mayo

  • The role of vasodilator therapy in heart failure.

    Kanu Chatterjee;William W. Parmley

  • Beneficial Effects of Vasodilator Agents in Severe Mitral Regurgitation Due to Dysfunction of Subvalvar Apparatus

    Kanu Chatterjee;William W. Parmley;H. J. C. Swan;Gilbert Berman

  • Oral hydralazine therapy for chronic refractory heart failure.

    K Chatterjee;W W Parmley;B Massie;B Greenberg

  • Immediate and sustained hemodynamic and clinical improvement in chronic heart failure by an oral angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.

    R Ader;K Chatterjee;T Ports;B Brundage

  • The pericardium substantially affects the left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relationship in the dog.

    S A Glantz;G A Misbach;W Y Moores;D G Mathey

  • Influence of direct myocardial revascularization on left ventricular asynergy and function in patients with coronary heart disease. With and without previous myocardial infarction.

    Kanu Chatterjee;H. J. C. Swan;William W. Parmley;Hector Sustaita

  • The cardiac hypertrophy process. Analyses of factors determining pathological vs. physiological development.

    J Wikman-Coffelt;W W Parmley;D T Mason

  • Long-Term Digitalis Therapy Improves Left Ventricular Function in Heart Failure

    Stephen B. Arnold;Randolph C. Byrd;Wolfgang Meister;Kenneth Melmon

  • Thallium-201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the clinical clarification of normal, abnormal and equivocal electrocardiographic stress tests

    Elias H. Botvinick;Michael R. Taradash;David M. Shames;William W. Parmley

  • Quantitative left ventricular wall motion analysis: a comparison of area, chord and radial methods.

    H J Gelberg;B H Brundage;S Glantz;W W Parmley

  • Glucagon Its Enhancement of Cardiac Performance in the Cat and Dog and Persistence of its Inotropic Action Despite Beta-Receptor Blockade with Propranolol

    G Glick;W W Parmley;A S Wechsler;E H Sonnenblick

Frequent Co-Authors

Kanu Chatterjee
Kanu Chatterjee University of Iowa
Stanton A. Glantz
Stanton A. Glantz University of California, San Francisco
Charles B. Higgins
Charles B. Higgins University of California, San Francisco
Prakash Deedwania
Prakash Deedwania United States Department of Veterans Affairs
H.J.C. Swan
H.J.C. Swan University of California, Los Angeles
Thomas L. James
Thomas L. James University of California, San Francisco
Randall J. Lee
Randall J. Lee University of California, San Francisco
Edmund H. Sonnenblick
Edmund H. Sonnenblick Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Michael T. Lawton
Michael T. Lawton Barrow Neurological Institute
Elyse Foster
Elyse Foster University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine isn’t limited to becoming a traditionally trained doctor. There are a variety of alternative online degrees and pathways that offer diverse opportunities in healthcare, often with more flexible entry requirements and faster completion times.

For those considering nursing, you may wonder, do I need to take the TEAS test for LPN? Some programs now allow nursing hopefuls to skip standard entrance exams, making this an accessible entry point. Meanwhile, experienced RNs interested in advancing their careers can benefit from RN to NP bridge programs, which are designed to help nurses transition into advanced practice roles.

Healthcare management is another promising avenue. An accelerated healthcare administration degree prepares students for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations, making it possible to impact patient care from a different perspective.

Nutrition and wellness are increasingly important in modern healthcare. Pursuing an online bachelor's in nutrition is ideal for those interested in dietetics, health education, or community wellness—fields that closely connect science, health, and patient care.

Best Scientists Citing William W. Parmley

Recently Published Articles