World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 121 3625 3391 2000 1848 939 51028

Charles B. Higgins publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charles B. Higgins between 1970 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles B. Higgins published across 53 years, from 1970 to 2022, averaging 17.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 75 publications in 1985. 1 of the 940 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 75. Peak 75 publications in 1985. 1970: 2 publications 1971: 7 publications 1972: 14 publications 1973: 8 publications 1974: 9 publications 1975: 6 publications 1976: 20 publications 1977: 11 publications 1978: 13 publications 1979: 8 publications 1980: 26 publications 1981: 12 publications 1982: 38 publications 1983: 54 publications 1984: 68 publications 1985: 75 publications 1986: 47 publications 1987: 41 publications 1988: 31 publications 1989: 28 publications 1990: 23 publications 1991: 22 publications 1992: 30 publications 1993: 31 publications 1994: 34 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 26 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 35 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1970 2022

940 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charles B. Higgins: publications per year, 1970 to 2022
Year Publications
1970 2
1971 7
1972 14
1973 8
1974 9
1975 6
1976 20
1977 11
1978 13
1979 8
1980 26
1981 12
1982 38
1983 54
1984 68
1985 75
1986 47
1987 41
1988 31
1989 28
1990 23
1991 22
1992 30
1993 31
1994 34
1995 12
1996 26
1997 13
1998 16
1999 18
2000 35
2001 11
2002 18
2003 20
2004 18
2005 15
2006 11
2007 10
2008 16
2009 7
2010 9
2011 8
2012 6
2013 4
2014 3
2015 4
2016 0
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
Total 940
Download as CSV

Charles B. Higgins publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles B. Higgins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 921–940 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 939 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116 939
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Charles B. Higgins D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles B. Higgins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 120–121 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287 121
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Distinguished Scientist Award, American Heart Association

Overview

Charles B. Higgins is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

The scientist's work covers diverse subfields such as Soil Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Environmental Engineering. Their research topics include Irrigation Practices and Water Management, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, and Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing.

Charles B. Higgins has contributed to the publication titled "Soil Water Dynamics, Effective Rooting Zone, and Evapotranspiration of Sprinkler Irrigated Potato in a Sandy Loam Soil," published in 2022 in the journal Agronomy.

  • Koffi Djaman
  • Komlan Koudahe
  • Aminou Saibou
  • Murali Darapuneni
  • Suat Irmak

  • Agronomy

In 2012, Charles B. Higgins received the Distinguished Scientist Award from the American Heart Association.

Best Publications

  • Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report.

    Dudley J. Pennell;Udo P. Sechtem;Charles B. Higgins;Warren J. Manning

  • Measurement of right and left ventricular volumes in healthy individuals with cine MR imaging.

    U Sechtem;P W Pflugfelder;R G Gould;M M Cassidy

  • Normal left ventricular dimensions and function: Interstudy reproducibility of measurements with cine MR imaging

    Richard C. Semelka;Ernesto Tomei;Stefan Wagner;John Mayo;John Mayo

  • Parasympathetic Control of the Heart

    Charles B. Higgins;Stephen F. Vatner;Eugene Braunwald

  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Dogs: Alterations in Magnetic Relaxation Times

    Charles B. Higgins;Robert Herfkens;Martin J. Lipton;Richard Sievers

  • CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease.

    Zhen J. Wang;Gautham P. Reddy;Michael B. Gotway;Benjamin M. Yeh

  • Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Four-dimensional MR Evaluation of Ascending Aortic Systolic Flow Patterns

    Michael D Hope;Thomas A Hope;Alison K Meadows;Karen G Ordovas

  • Measurement of the distribution volume of gadopentetate dimeglumine at echo-planar MR imaging to quantify myocardial infarction: comparison with 99mTc-DTPA autoradiography in rats.

    Håkan Arheden;Maythem Saeed;Charles B. Higgins;Dong-Wei Gao

  • Provocation of coronary spasm with ergonovine maleate: New test with results in 57 patients undergoing coronary arteriography☆

    John S. Schroeder;James L. Bolen;Robert A. Quint;David A. Clark

  • Interstudy reproducibility of dimensional and functional measurements between cine magnetic resonance studies in the morphologically abnormal left ventricle.

    Richard C. Semelka;Ernesto Tomei;Stefan Wagner;John Mayo

  • Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of right ventricular pressure-volume loops - In vivo validation and clinical application in patients with pulmonary hypertension

    Titus Kuehne;Sevim Yilmaz;Paul Steendijk;Phillip Moore

  • Magnetic resonance imaging with respiratory gating: techniques and advantages

    R L Ehman;M T McNamara;M Pallack;H Hricak

  • Whole-heart steady-state free precession coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography.

    Oliver M. Weber;Alastair J. Martin;Alastair J. Martin;Charles B. Higgins

  • Constrictive Pericarditis and Restrictive Cardiomyopathy: Evaluation With MR Imaging

    T Masui;S Finck;C B Higgins

  • Right and left ventricular stroke volume measurements with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: In vitro and in vivo validation

    C Kondo;G R Caputo;R Semelka;E Foster

  • LEFT ATRIAL VOLUME DETERMINATION BY BIPLANE TWO-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: VALIDATION BY CINE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

    Barbara Kircher;Joseph A. Abbott;Stanley Pau;Robert G. Gould

  • Evaluation of left ventricular volume and mass with breath-hold cine MR imaging.

    Hajime Sakuma;Naoya Fujita;Thomas K F Foo;Gary R. Caputo

  • A waterborne outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections and hemolytic uremic syndrome: implications for rural water systems.

    Sonja J Olsen;Gayle Miller;Thomas Breuer;Malinda Kennedy

  • Cine MR imaging: potential for the evaluation of cardiovascular function.

    U Sechtem;P W Pflugfelder;R D White;R G Gould

  • 4D flow CMR in assessment of valve-related ascending aortic disease.

    Michael D. Hope;Thomas A. Hope;Stephen E.S. Crook;Karen G. Ordovas

Frequent Co-Authors

Hedvig Hricak
Hedvig Hricak Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Eugene Braunwald
Eugene Braunwald Harvard Medical School
Stephen F. Vatner
Stephen F. Vatner Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Nelson B. Schiller
Nelson B. Schiller University of California, San Francisco
William W. Parmley
William W. Parmley University of California, San Francisco
Joseph F. Polak
Joseph F. Polak Boston University
William L. Stanford
William L. Stanford Ottawa Hospital
Orlo H. Clark
Orlo H. Clark University of California, San Francisco
Robert J. Herfkens
Robert J. Herfkens Stanford University
Udo Sechtem
Udo Sechtem Robert Bosch (Germany)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for healthcare professionals rises, many students are exploring online options to fast-track their medical and nursing careers. Flexible learning allows you to balance work, family, and academic commitments while getting a quality education.

For those pursuing advanced practice roles, online phd programs nursing offer a convenient route to leadership and research positions. Alternatively, if you’re a registered nurse aiming to increase your earning potential and improve patient care, you may want to consider affordable rn to bsn programs that fit your schedule and budget.

Individuals from non-nursing backgrounds can launch a new career quickly with msn direct entry programs online, which provide a streamlined path into nursing with an advanced degree. For students seeking programs with less competitive admissions, exploring the easiest bsn program to get into can help you start your journey with fewer hurdles.

Each of these pathways opens doors to new roles in healthcare, making them valuable steps for anyone interested in studying medicine in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Charles B. Higgins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles