World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan Bogaert

Jan Bogaert

Jan Bogaert publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Bogaert sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jan Bogaert D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Bogaert sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Bogaert is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium, focusing research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Biomedical Engineering.

The researcher's main topics of study emphasize various aspects of cardiac health and diagnostics. Key areas include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise, Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation Studies, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments, and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair.

Jan Bogaert has contributed to multiple papers in leading medical and cardiovascular journals. Some notable recent publications are:

  • SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance, 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Imaging predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: left ventricular work asymmetry by echocardiography and septal viability by cardiac magnetic resonance, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) guidelines for reporting cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations, 2022, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • AI Cardiac MRI Scar Analysis Aids Prediction of Major Arrhythmic Events in the Multicenter DERIVATE Registry, 2023, Radiology
  • Shear Wave Elastography Using High-Frame-Rate Imaging in the Follow-Up of Heart Transplantation Recipients, 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jan Bogaert include:

  • Tom Dresselaers
  • Rik Willems
  • Pier Giorgio Masci
  • Jens-Uwe Voigt
  • Guido Claessen

They have published extensively in several prominent venues. The most frequent publication outlets are:

  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Circulation
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging

Best Publications

  • 2015 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases.

    Yehuda Adler;Philippe Charron;Massimo Imazio;Luigi Badano

  • Autologous bone marrow-derived stem-cell transfer in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

    Stefan Janssens;Christophe Dubois;Jan Bogaert;Koen Theunissen

  • Exercise-induced right ventricular dysfunction and structural remodelling in endurance athletes

    André La Gerche;André La Gerche;Andrew T. Burns;Don J. Mooney;Warrick J. Inder

  • A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension.

    Tessa S S Genders;Ewout W Steyerberg;Hatem Alkadhi;Sebastian Leschka

  • Expert consensus for multi-modality imaging evaluation of cardiovascular complications of radiotherapy in adults: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography.

    Patrizio Lancellotti;Vuyisile T. Nkomo;Luigi P. Badano;Jutta Bergler

  • Lymph node staging in non-small-cell lung cancer with FDG-PET scan: a prospective study on 690 lymph node stations from 68 patients.

    J F Vansteenkiste;S G Stroobants;P R De Leyn;P J Dupont

  • Regional nonuniformity of normal adult human left ventricle

    Jan Bogaert;Frank E. Rademakers

  • Visualization of Ventricular Thrombi With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease

    Nico R. Mollet;Steven Dymarkowski;Wim Volders;Jurgen Wathiong

  • Impact of myocardial haemorrhage on left ventricular function and remodelling in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction

    Javier Ganame;Giancarlo Messalli;Steven Dymarkowski;Frank E Rademakers

  • Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: retrospective pooled analysis of existing cohorts

    Tessa S. S Genders;Ewout W Steyerberg;M. G. Myriam Hunink;M. G. Myriam Hunink;Koen Nieman

  • Clinical cardiac MRI

    Jan Bogaert;Steven Dymarkowski;Andrew M. Taylor

  • Cardiac MRI: a new gold standard for ventricular volume quantification during high-intensity exercise.

    Andre La Gerche;Guido Claessen;Alexander Van De Bruaene;Nele Nele Pattyn

  • Impact of primary coronary angioplasty delay on myocardial salvage, infarct size, and microvascular damage in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insight from cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

    Marco Francone;Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci;Iacopo Carbone;Emanuele Canali

  • Echo Parameters for Differential Diagnosis in Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Deformation and Nondeformation Parameters.

    Efstathios D. Pagourelias;Oana Mirea;Jürgen Duchenne;Johan Van Cleemput

  • Remodeling of T-Tubules and Reduced Synchrony of Ca2+ Release in Myocytes From Chronically Ischemic Myocardium

    Frank R. Heinzel;Virginie Bito;Liesbeth Biesmans;Ming Wu

  • SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

    Tim Leiner;Jan Bogaert;Jan Bogaert;Matthias G. Friedrich;Raad Mohiaddin

  • Pericardial Disease: Value of CT and MR Imaging

    Jan Bogaert;Marco Francone

  • FDG-PET scan in potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: do anatometabolic PET-CT fusion images improve the localisation of regional lymph node metastases? The Leuven Lung Cancer Group.

    J F Vansteenkiste;S G Stroobants;P J Dupont;P R De Leyn

  • Additional value of PET-CT in the staging of lung cancer: comparison with CT alone, PET alone and visual correlation of PET and CT

    W De Wever;S Ceyssens;Luc Mortelmans;Sigrid Stroobants

  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pericardial diseases

    Jan Bogaert;Marco Francone

Frequent Co-Authors

Hein Heidbuchel
Hein Heidbuchel University of Antwerp
Guy Marchal
Guy Marchal KU Leuven
Marc Gewillig
Marc Gewillig KU Leuven
Frederik Maes
Frederik Maes KU Leuven
Reinhart Ceulemans
Reinhart Ceulemans University of Antwerp
Paul Suetens
Paul Suetens KU Leuven
Hans Beeckman
Hans Beeckman Royal Museum for Central Africa
Eric Haubruge
Eric Haubruge University of Liège

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine or healthcare but seeking alternative or supplementary pathways, there is a growing range of flexible online degree options. Whether you’re aiming for leadership, clinical expertise, or healthcare technology roles, studying online can be a convenient and cost-effective choice.

Those looking to move into management roles within healthcare organizations may consider enrolling in cheap mha programs. These programs focus on developing administrative leadership skills essential in hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare facilities.

For advanced nursing professionals, there are cheap online dnp programs available that equip nurses for top clinical and educational roles while allowing them to study remotely.

Pharmacy is another in-demand field, and the option to complete a 3 year online pharmd makes it accessible to more students who need flexibility or accelerated progression.

Lastly, students interested in data, technology, and healthcare operations can pursue an online health information management degree to build expertise in electronic health records and health information systems—crucial areas for modern healthcare delivery.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Bogaert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles