World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
40128
World Ranking
11581
National Ranking
5944

Christopher M. Kramer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher M. Kramer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 577 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Christopher M. Kramer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher M. Kramer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Christopher M. Kramer is affiliated with the University of Virginia Health System in the United States. Their research activity is concentrated in the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Molecular Biology.

Their scholarly contributions encompass a range of topics including:

  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Christopher M. Kramer has published prolifically, with frequent appearances in several scientific venues. These include:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Circulation
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition

Some of the recent notable papers associated with Kramer include:

  • Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update (2020), Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines (2022), Circulation
  • Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update (2020), Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Kramer collaborates frequently with other researchers in the field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Michael Salerno
  • Amit R. Patel
  • Stefan Neubauer
  • Raymond Y. Kwong
  • Milind Y. Desai

Their work's primary areas of study and publication reflect ongoing engagement with cardiovascular imaging, diagnostics, and related therapeutic subjects. Kramer has also been recognized as a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging*

    Robert C. Hendel;Manesh R. Patel;Christopher M. Kramer;Michael Poon

  • Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing

    Jeanette Schulz-Menger;David A Bluemke;Jens Bremerich;Scott D Flamm

  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Nonischemic Myocardial Inflammation: Expert Recommendations.

    Vanessa M. Ferreira;Jeanette Schulz-Menger;Godtfred Holmvang;Christopher M. Kramer

  • Criteria for Evaluation of Novel Markers of Cardiovascular Risk A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Mark A. Hlatky;Philip Greenland;Donna K. Arnett;Christie M. Ballantyne

  • Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

    Iacopo Olivotto;Artur Oreziak;Roberto Barriales-Villa;Theodore P. Abraham

  • ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography

    Pamela S. Douglas;Mario J. Garcia;David E. Haines;Wyman W. Lai

  • ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography: A report of the American college of cardiology foundation appropriate use criteria task force, the society of cardiovascular computed tomography, the American college of radiology, the American heart association, the American society of echocardiography

    Allen J. Taylor;Manuel Cerqueira;John McB Hodgson;Daniel Mark

  • Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update

    Christopher M. Kramer;Jörg Barkhausen;Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci;Scott D. Flamm

  • Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update

    Christopher M Kramer;Jörg Barkhausen;Scott D Flamm;Raymond J Kim

  • Expert Consensus DocumentACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: board of trustees task force on standardized protocols

    Christopher M Kramer;Jorg Barkhausen;Scott D Flamm;Raymond J Kim

  • Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update

    Jeanette Schulz-Menger;David A. Bluemke;Jens Bremerich;Scott D. Flamm

  • Prognostic Value of Late Gadolinium Enhancement in Clinical Outcomes for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    John J. Green;Jeffery S. Berger;Christopher M. Kramer;Michael Salerno

  • Three-dimensional left ventricular deformation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

    Alistair A. Young;Christopher M. Kramer;Victor A. Ferrari;Leon Axel

  • ACCF/HRS/AHA/ASE/HFSA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2013 Appropriate Use Criteria for Implantable Cardioverter- Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

    Andrea M. Russo;Andrea M. Russo;Raymond F. Stainback;Steven R. Bailey;Andrew E. Epstein;Andrew E. Epstein

  • Late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes in nonischemic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Sujith Kuruvilla;Nebiyu Adenaw;Arabindra B. Katwal;Michael J. Lipinski

  • The MOGE(S) classification for a phenotype-genotype nomenclature of cardiomyopathy: endorsed by the World Heart Federation.

    Eloisa Arbustini;Navneet Narula;G. William Dec;K. Srinath Reddy

  • ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography

    Allen J. Taylor;Manuel Cerqueira;John Mc B. Hodgson;Daniel Mark

  • ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 Multimodality Appropriate Use Criteria for the Detection and Risk Assessment of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

    Michael J. Wolk;Steven R. Bailey;John U. Doherty;Pamela S. Douglas

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig H. Meyer
Craig H. Meyer University of Virginia
Jagat Narula
Jagat Narula Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Stefan Neubauer
Stefan Neubauer University of Oxford
Manesh R. Patel
Manesh R. Patel Duke University
Nathaniel Reichek
Nathaniel Reichek Stony Brook University
Raymond Y. Kwong
Raymond Y. Kwong Brigham and Women's Hospital
Arthur Weltman
Arthur Weltman University of Virginia
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Eike Nagel
Eike Nagel Goethe University Frankfurt
Hugh Watkins
Hugh Watkins University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in healthcare careers but aren’t ready for the full commitment of medical school, there are many related online degrees and alternative pathways. These programs offer flexible learning options, lower costs, and varied entry requirements, making them more accessible for many students.

For example, positions like medical billing and coding specialists are in high demand. Budding professionals often ask, how much is medical billing and coding school? Online programs are often very affordable, with some costing a fraction of traditional classroom courses.

Nursing is another in-demand field that can be entered at different levels. If you’re considering becoming a nurse practitioner, many wonder about the cheapest np school online for maximum value and flexibility. For aspiring registered nurses, you might ask, how much does online nursing school cost and find a wide range of affordable online programs.

For advanced practice, you can explore doctoral options like DNP programs. Researching the cheapest dnp online program can help you maximize your potential without excessive student debt. Exploring these options can lead to rewarding healthcare careers that support patients and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher M. Kramer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles