World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
47
Citations
14541
World Ranking
4729
National Ranking
1355

Craig H. Meyer publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig H. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 240 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Craig H. Meyer D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig H. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Craig H. Meyer is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant portion dedicated to Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Other subfields include Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Spectroscopy, and Surgery.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics related to medical and imaging technologies. These topics include:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Meyer has published extensively in several academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • NMR in Biomedicine
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Academic Radiology

Recent research papers showcase their contributions to various aspects of medical imaging and computational techniques. Notable papers include:

  • Brain Tumor Segmentation Using an Ensemble of 3D U-Nets and Overall Survival Prediction Using Radiomic Features, 2020, Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
  • Deep learning methods for automatic evaluation of delayed enhancement-MRI. The results of the EMIDEC challenge, 2022, Medical Image Analysis
  • QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results, 2022, The Journal of Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging
  • Fully-automated global and segmental strain analysis of DENSE cardiovascular magnetic resonance using deep learning for segmentation and phase unwrapping, 2021, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Comparison between MR and CT imaging used to correct for skull-induced phase aberrations during transcranial focused ultrasound, 2022, Scientific Reports

Meyer often collaborates with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Xue Feng
  • John P. Mugler
  • Zhixing Wang
  • Christopher M. Kramer
  • Dou Quan

Among recognitions received, Meyer is a Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE), awarded in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge

    Spyridon Bakas;Mauricio Reyes;Andras Jakab;Stefan Bauer

  • Selection of a convolution function for Fourier inversion using gridding (computerised tomography application)

    J.I. Jackson;C.H. Meyer;D.G. Nishimura;A. Macovski

  • Fast spiral coronary artery imaging

    Craig H. Meyer;Bob S. Hu;Dwight G. Nishimura;Albert Macovski

  • Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation.

    Meyer Ch;Pauly Jm;Macovski A;Nishimura Dg

  • Coronary angiography with magnetization-prepared T2 contrast.

    Jean H. Brittain;Bob S. Hu;Graham A. Wright;Craig H. Meyer

  • Discrimination of large venous vessels in time-course spiral blood-oxygen-level-dependent magnetic-resonance functional neuroimaging.

    Adrian T. Lee;Gary H. Glover;Craig H. Meyer

  • Relationships of 35 lower limb muscles to height and body mass quantified using MRI

    Geoffrey G. Handsfield;Craig H. Meyer;Joseph M. Hart;Mark F. Abel

  • A homogeneity correction method for magnetic resonance imaging with time-varying gradients

    D.C. Noll;C.H. Meyer;J.M. Pauly;D.G. Nishimura

  • Technology insight: in vivo cell tracking by use of MRI.

    Walter J Rogers;Craig H Meyer;Christopher M Kramer

  • The upper limit of human smooth pursuit velocity.

    Craig H. Meyer;Adrian G. Lasker;David A. Robinson

  • Spiral K‐space MR imaging of cortical activation

    Douglas C. Noll;Douglas C. Noll;Jonathan D. Cohen;Jonathan D. Cohen;Craig H. Meyer;Walter Schneider

  • Deblurring for non-2D Fourier transform magnetic resonance imaging.

    D C Noll;J M Pauly;C H Meyer;D G Nishimura

  • Volumetric spectroscopic imaging with spiral‐based k‐space trajectories

    Elfar Adalsteinsson;Pablo Irarrazabal;Simon Topp;Craig Meyer

  • Real-time motion detection in spiral MRI using navigators

    Todd S. Sachs;Craig H. Meyer;Bob S. Hu;Jim Kohli

  • Brain Tumor Segmentation Using an Ensemble of 3D U-Nets and Overall Survival Prediction Using Radiomic Features.

    Xue Feng;Nicholas J. Tustison;Sohil H. Patel;Craig H. Meyer

  • Inhomogeneity correction using an estimated linear field map

    Pablo Irarrazabal;Craig H. Meyer;Dwight G. Nishimura;Albert Macovski

  • A Velocity k-Space Analysis of Flow Effects in Echo-Planar and Spiral Imaging

    Dwight G. Nishimura;Pablo Irarrazabal;Craig H. Meyer

  • Imaging three-dimensional myocardial mechanics using navigator-gated volumetric spiral cine DENSE MRI.

    Xiaodong Zhong;Bruce S. Spottiswoode;Craig H. Meyer;Christopher M. Kramer

  • The diminishing variance algorithm for real-time reduction of motion artifacts in MRI.

    Todd S. Sachs;Craig H. Meyer;Pablo Irarrazabal;Bob S. Hu

  • Magnetic resonance fluoroscopy using spirals with variable sampling densities

    Daniel M. Spielman;John M. Pauly;Craig H. Meyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher M. Kramer
Christopher M. Kramer University of Virginia Health System
Dwight G. Nishimura
Dwight G. Nishimura Stanford University
John M. Pauly
John M. Pauly Stanford University
Max Wintermark
Max Wintermark Stanford University
Arthur Weltman
Arthur Weltman University of Virginia
Kim Butts Pauly
Kim Butts Pauly Stanford University
Alexander L. Klibanov
Alexander L. Klibanov University of Virginia
Jason P. Sheehan
Jason P. Sheehan University of Virginia
Krishna S. Nayak
Krishna S. Nayak University of Southern California
Douglas C. Noll
Douglas C. Noll University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring opportunities beyond traditional engineering and technology degrees in the USA, there are flexible study options designed to accelerate your career. Many learners seek alternatives that fit their schedules, life commitments, and financial goals.

Fast-track programs are gaining popularity. You can now earn a masters degree in 6 months, helping you upskill and enter the workforce sooner. If you want to specialize quickly, consider short certificate programs that pay well, which focus on industry-relevant skills and can boost your earning potential.

Flexibility is crucial for many learners, such as parents or working professionals. There are excellent options for those looking for degrees for stay at home moms, providing quality education and the ability to manage home life. Additionally, 6 week classes offer intensive learning for rapid completion, ideal for gaining knowledge in a short time.

These pathways make it easier to balance education, work, and personal commitments while advancing in engineering and technology fields.

Best Scientists Citing Craig H. Meyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles