World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 60 1990 1789 159 143 66 8971

J. David Barry publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by J. David Barry between 1978 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. J. David Barry published across 44 years, from 1978 to 2021, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2005. 1 of the 137 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2005. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1978 2021

137 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
J. David Barry: publications per year, 1978 to 2021
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 3
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 3
1984 5
1985 3
1986 4
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 3
1991 4
1992 3
1993 3
1994 0
1995 0
1996 4
1997 3
1998 3
1999 6
2000 5
2001 4
2002 7
2003 10
2004 9
2005 13
2006 2
2007 8
2008 4
2009 2
2010 4
2011 0
2012 8
2013 5
2014 1
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 137
Download as CSV

J. David Barry publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. David Barry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 57–66 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 66 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17 66
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

J. David Barry D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. David Barry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120 60
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

J. David Barry is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile currently does not list any recent papers, frequent co-authors, or recurring publication venues.

There is no available data on specific fields or subfields of study that they specialize in. Similarly, information on main topics of research, book publications, or awards won has not been documented in the provided data.

The absence of detailed publication records or collaborative networks limits the ability to outline distinct areas of research focus or scholarly contributions. However, their established position at a recognized university indicates engagement in academic activities within their discipline.

This concise overview reflects the available factual data concerning J. David Barry's academic background and research profile.

Best Publications

  • The Genome of the African Trypanosome Trypanosoma brucei

    Matthew Berriman;Elodie Ghedin;Elodie Ghedin;Christiane Hertz-Fowler;Gaelle Blandin

  • Antigenic variation in trypanosomes: enhanced phenotypic variation in a eukaryotic parasite.

    Barry Jd;McCulloch R

  • Telomeric expression sites are highly conserved in Trypanosoma brucei.

    Christiane Hertz-Fowler;Luisa M. Figueiredo;Michael A. Quail;Marion Becker

  • Why are parasite contingency genes often associated with telomeres

    J. D. Barry;Michael L. Ginger;P. Burton;R. McCulloch

  • Analysis of the VSG gene silent archive in Trypanosoma brucei reveals that mosaic gene expression is prominent in antigenic variation and is favored by archive substructure.

    Lucio Marcello;J. David Barry

  • A role for RAD51 and homologous recombination in Trypanosoma brucei antigenic variation

    McCulloch R;Barry Jd

  • Effectiveness of GF-120 fruit fly bait spray applied to border area plants for control of melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae)

    Ronald J. Prokopy;Neil W. Miller;Jaime C. Piñero;James D. Barry

  • A cysteine proteinase cDNA from Trypanosoma brucei predicts an enzyme with an unusual C‐terminal extension

    Jeremy C. Mottram;Michael J. North;J.David Barry;Graham H. Coombs

  • Antigenic diversity is generated by distinct evolutionary mechanisms in African trypanosome species

    Andrew P. Jackson;Andrew Berry;Martin Aslett;Harriet C. Allison

  • The Genome Sequence of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, Causative Agent of Chronic Human African Trypanosomiasis

    Andrew P. Jackson;Mandy Sanders;Andrew Berry;Jacqueline McQuillan

  • Chromosomes of kinetoplastida.

    L. H. T. Van Der Ploeg;A. W. C. A. Cornelissen;J. D. Barry;P. Borst

  • Mosaic VSGs and the scale of Trypanosoma brucei antigenic variation.

    James P. J. Hall;Huanhuan Wang;J. David Barry

  • An update on antigenic variation in African trypanosomes

    Luc Vanhamme;Etienne Pays;Richard McCulloch;J.David Barry

  • NUP-1 Is a large coiled-coil nucleoskeletal protein in trypanosomes with lamin-like functions.

    Kelly N. DuBois;Sam Alsford;Jennifer M. Holden;Johanna Buisson

  • ELT-3: A Caenorhabditis elegans GATA factor expressed in the embryonic epidermis during morphogenesis.

    J S Gilleard;Y Shafi;J D Barry;J D McGhee

  • Genome-wide Analysis Reveals Extensive Functional Interaction between DNA Replication Initiation and Transcription in the Genome of Trypanosoma brucei

    Calvin Tiengwe;Lucio Marcello;Helen Farr;Nicholas J. Dickens

  • The identification of Trypanosoma brucei subspecies using repetitive DNA sequences.

    Geoff Hide;Pierre Cattand;Dominique LeRay;J.David Barry

  • The PARP Promoter of Trypanosoma Brucei Is Developmentally Regulated in a Chromosomal Context

    Susanne Biebinger;Susanne Rettenmaier;John Flaspohler;Claudia Hartmann

  • A cell-surface phylome for African trypanosomes.

    Andrew P. Jackson;Andrew P. Jackson;Harriet C. Allison;J. David Barry;Mark C. Field

  • Transformation of monomorphic and pleomorphic Trypanosoma brucei

    Richard McCulloch;Erik Vassella;Peter Burton;Michael Boshart

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew Berriman
Matthew Berriman University of Glasgow
Mark C. Field
Mark C. Field University of Dundee
Mandy Sanders
Mandy Sanders Wellcome Sanger Institute
Michael A. Quail
Michael A. Quail Wellcome Sanger Institute
Daniel T. Haydon
Daniel T. Haydon University of Glasgow
Karen Mungall
Karen Mungall BC Cancer Agency
Elodie Ghedin
Elodie Ghedin National Institutes of Health
Carol Churcher
Carol Churcher University of Cambridge
Stephen D. Bell
Stephen D. Bell Indiana University
Neil Hall
Neil Hall Norwich Research Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Molecular Biology, there are several related online degrees and career options worth exploring. Interdisciplinary programs can be an excellent fit, offering the flexibility to combine life sciences with other areas like informatics or public policy. If you want to know more about the professional outlooks and job options, check out this resource on online interdisciplinary studies degree career outcomes.

For those captivated by scientific history, pursuing the best online history masters can open doors to education, research, and archival careers. Additionally, students interested in working within academic or biomedical libraries might consider a Master’s in Library and Information Science. Discover the average cost of mlis degree us before you enroll.

Another viable pathway is speech-language pathology, particularly relevant for molecular biologists interested in communication disorders or language acquisition. Consider programs that are recognized for academic rigor such as asha approved slp programs.

Best Scientists Citing J. David Barry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles