World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
4624
World Ranking
7170
National Ranking
558

Jamie R. Wood publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie R. Wood sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 130 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jamie R. Wood D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie R. Wood sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jamie R. Wood is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with significant contributions spanning 45 publications.

The scientist's main fields of study include Ecology, Geography, Planning and Development, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Atmospheric Science, and Nature and Landscape Conservation. Their research concentrates on topics such as Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, Isotope Analysis in Ecology, Archaeology and ancient environmental studies, and Genetic diversity and population structure.

Recent published papers authored or co-authored by Jamie R. Wood include:

  • "The diets of moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes)" (2020), New Zealand Journal of Ecology
  • "Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins" (2022), Nature Communications
  • "Rarity is a more reliable indicator of land-use impacts on soil invertebrate communities than other diversity metrics" (2020), eLife
  • "Strengthening global-change science by integrating aeDNA with paleoecoinformatics" (2023), Trends in Ecology & Evolution
  • "Environmental and plant community drivers of plant pathogen composition and richness" (2021), New Phytologist

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Jamie R. Wood include:

  • Janet M. Wilmshurst (17 collaborations)
  • Theresa L. Cole (9 collaborations)
  • George L. W. Perry (8 collaborations)
  • Sarah J. Richardson (6 collaborations)
  • Lara D. Shepherd (5 collaborations)

Key publication venues for this scientist's work are:

  • New Zealand Journal of Ecology (3 publications)
  • New Zealand Journal of Botany (3 publications)
  • Nature Communications (2 publications)
  • Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society (2 publications)
  • Quaternary Science Reviews (2 publications)

Best Publications

  • Ancient DNA reveals elephant birds and kiwi are sister taxa and clarifies ratite bird evolution

    Kieren J. Mitchell;Bastien Llamas;Julien Soubrier;Nicolas J. Rawlence

  • Ancient plant DNA in lake sediments

    Laura Parducci;Keith D. Bennett;Keith D. Bennett;Gentile Francesco Ficetola;Gentile Francesco Ficetola;Inger Greve Alsos

  • Methods for the extraction, storage, amplification and sequencing of DNA from environmental samples

    Gavin Lear;Ian Dickie;Jonathan C. Banks;Stephane Boyer

  • Island extinctions: processes, patterns, and potential for ecosystem restoration

    Jamie R. Wood;Josep A. Alcover;Tim M. Blackburn;Pere Bover

  • A comparison of the ability of PLFA and 16s rRNA gene metabarcoding to resolve soil community change and predict ecosystem functions

    Kate H. Orwin;Ian Dickie;R. J. Holdaway;J. R. Wood

  • A high-precision chronology for the rapid extinction of New Zealand moa (Aves, Dinornithiformes)

    George L.W. Perry;Andrew B. Wheeler;Jamie R. Wood;Janet M. Wilmshurst;Janet M. Wilmshurst

  • Using ancient DNA to study the origins and dispersal of ancestral Polynesian chickens across the Pacific

    Vicki A Thomson;Ophelie Lebrasseur;Jeremy J. Austin;Jeremy J. Austin;Terry L Hunt;Terry L Hunt

  • Using palaeoenvironmental DNA to reconstruct past environments: progress and prospects

    Nicolas J. Rawlence;David J. Lowe;Jamie R. Wood;Jennifer M. Young

  • Coprolite deposits reveal the diet and ecology of the extinct New Zealand megaherbivore moa (Aves, Dinornithiformes)

    Jamie R. Wood;Nicolas J. Rawlence;Geoffery M. Rogers;Jeremy J. Austin

  • A High-Resolution Chronology of Rapid Forest Transitions following Polynesian Arrival in New Zealand

    David B. McWethy;Janet M. Wilmshurst;Janet M. Wilmshurst;Cathy Whitlock;Jamie R. Wood

  • High-Resolution Coproecology: Using Coprolites to Reconstruct the Habits and Habitats of New Zealand’s Extinct Upland Moa (Megalapteryx didinus)

    Jamie R. Wood;Janet M. Wilmshurst;Steven J. Wagstaff;Trevor H. Worthy

  • Use of Pollen and Ancient DNA as Conservation Baselines for Offshore Islands in New Zealand

    Janet M. Wilmshurst;Neville T. Moar;Jamie R. Wood;Peter J. Bellingham

  • Legacy of avian-dominated plant-herbivore systems in New Zealand

    William G. Lee;Jamie R. Wood;Geoffrey M. Rogers

  • Novel interactions between non‐native mammals and fungi facilitate establishment of invasive pines

    Jamie R. Wood;Ian A. Dickie;Ian A. Dickie;Holly V. Moeller;Duane A. Peltzer

  • A Megafauna’s Microfauna: Gastrointestinal Parasites of New Zealand’s Extinct Moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes)

    Jamie R. Wood;Janet M. Wilmshurst;Nicolas J. Rawlence;Karen I. Bonner

  • Multiscale climate change impacts on plant diversity in the Atacama Desert

    Francisca P. Díaz;Francisca P. Díaz;Claudio Latorre;Gabriela Carrasco‐Puga;Gabriela Carrasco‐Puga;Jamie R. Wood

  • Resolving lost herbivore community structure using coprolites of four sympatric moa species (Aves: Dinornithiformes)

    Jamie R. Wood;Janet M. Wilmshurst;Sarah J. Richardson;Nicolas J. Rawlence

  • Ancient mitochondrial genome reveals unsuspected taxonomic affinity of the extinct Chatham duck (Pachyanas chathamica) and resolves divergence times for New Zealand and sub-Antarctic brown teals.

    Kieren J. Mitchell;Jamie R. Wood;R. Paul Scofield;Bastien Llamas

  • Soil microbial community structure explains the resistance of respiration to a dry–rewet cycle, but not soil functioning under static conditions

    Kate H. Orwin;Ian A. Dickie;Ian A. Dickie;Jamie R. Wood;Karen I. Bonner

  • DNA content and distribution in ancient feathers and potential to reconstruct the plumage of extinct avian taxa

    Nicolas J. Rawlence;Jamie R. Wood;Kyle N. Armstrong;Alan Cooper

  • Coprolites reveal ecological interactions lost with the extinction of New Zealand birds

    Alexander P. Boast;Alexander P. Boast;Alexander P. Boast;Laura S. Weyrich;Jamie R. Wood;Jessica L. Metcalf

  • Sporormiella as a proxy for non-mammalian herbivores in island ecosystems

    Jamie R. Wood;Janet M. Wilmshurst;Trevor H. Worthy;Alan Cooper

Frequent Co-Authors

Janet M. Wilmshurst
Janet M. Wilmshurst Landcare Research
Alan Cooper
Alan Cooper Charles Sturt University
Ian A. Dickie
Ian A. Dickie University of Canterbury
Trevor H. Worthy
Trevor H. Worthy Flinders University
Matt S. McGlone
Matt S. McGlone Landcare Research
Sarah J. Richardson
Sarah J. Richardson Landcare Research
Jeremy J. Austin
Jeremy J. Austin University of Adelaide
Peter J. Bellingham
Peter J. Bellingham Landcare Research
Karen I. Bonner
Karen I. Bonner Landcare Research
Rodrigo A. Gutiérrez
Rodrigo A. Gutiérrez Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a diverse range of careers, from scientific research to environmental policy. If you're considering flexible options, there are numerous online degrees available in related fields that provide quality education at an affordable cost.

For students interested in customizable study paths, exploring the best value online interdisciplinary studies degrees can be a smart choice, allowing you to blend ecological studies with other interests. If you're more historically focused, the best online history masters programs offer insight into the evolution of scientific thought and environmental history.

Careers in library research or resource management are also relevant, with the average cost of mlis degree us showing that pursuing a Master’s in Library and Information Science can be both impactful and affordable. For those interested in the communication side of science, especially in roles that bridge health and environment, consider programs like the asha accredited slp programs which meet the highest professional standards.

Explore these diverse online pathways to build a flexible, meaningful career connected to ecology and evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Jamie R. Wood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles