World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4731 4382 2628 2378 150 15505

Marci Lobel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marci Lobel between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marci Lobel published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 7 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
1989 2025

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marci Lobel: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 1
1993 4
1994 1
1995 2
1996 0
1997 2
1998 1
1999 3
2000 1
2001 1
2002 5
2003 0
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 3
2008 5
2009 4
2010 5
2011 8
2012 7
2013 6
2014 3
2015 6
2016 3
2017 6
2018 8
2019 9
2020 12
2021 21
2022 8
2023 10
2024 5
2025 2
Total 162
Download as CSV

Marci Lobel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marci Lobel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 150
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marci Lobel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marci Lobel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Marci Lobel is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States and specializes in medicine, with a focus on obstetrics and gynecology, public health, environmental and occupational health, clinical psychology, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, and sociology and political science. Their research encompasses maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, COVID-19 impact on reproduction, maternal and perinatal health interventions, prenatal substance exposure effects, child abuse and trauma, reproductive health and contraception, as well as attachment and relationship dynamics.

Their recent scholarly contributions include studies on pandemic-related pregnancy stress and maternal outcomes. Notable papers feature:

  • "Vulnerability and resilience to pandemic-related stress among U.S. women pregnant at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020), published in Social Science & Medicine
  • "Pandemic-related pregnancy stress and anxiety among women pregnant during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic" (2020), published in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM
  • "Psychometric properties of the Pandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress Scale (PREPS)" (2020), published in Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology
  • "Adverse Perinatal Outcomes Predicted by Prenatal Maternal Stress Among U.S. Women at the COVID-19 Pandemic Onset" (2021), published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • "The role of pandemic-related pregnancy stress in preference for community birth during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States" (2021), published in Birth

Frequent collaborators in their research include Heidi Preis, Brittain Mahaffey, Cassandra Heiselman, Amanda Levinson, and Michalina Ilska.

Their work has been published in various academic venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in:

  • Archives of Women's Mental Health
  • Birth
  • Women's Reproductive Health
  • Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Marci Lobel's body of work is mainly situated within interdisciplinary fields that address the intersection of psychological and medical aspects of reproduction and maternal health. In recognition of professional contributions, they were named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 2008.

Best Publications

  • Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts.

    Shelley E. Taylor;Marci Lobel

  • Social Support in Pregnancy: Psychosocial Correlates of Birth Outcomes and Postpartum Depression

    Nancy L. Collins;Christine Dunkel-Schetter;Marci Lobel;Susan C. M. Scrimshaw

  • Pregnancy-specific stress, prenatal health behaviors, and birth outcomes.

    Marci Lobel;Dolores Lacey Cannella;Jennifer E. Graham;Carla DeVincent

  • Prenatal maternal stress and prematurity: a prospective study of socioeconomically disadvantaged women.

    Marci Lobel;Christine Dunkel-Schetter;Susan C. Scrimshaw

  • Explaining Disproportionately High Rates of Adverse Birth Outcomes among African Americans: The Impact of Stress, Racism, and Related Factors in Pregnancy.

    Cheryl L. Giscombé;Marci Lobel

  • Coping and distress in pregnancy: an investigation of medically high risk women.

    A M. Yali;M. Lobel

  • The perils of outperformance: sensitivity about being the target of a threatening upward comparison.

    Julie Juola Exline;Marci Lobel

  • Sources of Enjoyment for Youth Sport Athletes

    Tara K. Scanlan;Paul J. Carpenter;Marci Lobel;Jeffery P. Simons

  • The impact of prenatal maternal stress and optimistic disposition on birth outcomes in medically high-risk women.

    Marci Lobel;Carla J. DeVincent;Anita Kaminer;Bruce A. Meyer

  • Conceptualizations, measurement, and effects of prenatal maternal stress on birth outcomes

    Marci Lobel

  • When god disappoints: difficulty forgiving god and its role in negative emotion.

    Julie Juola Exline;Ann Marie Yali;Marci Lobel

  • Psychosocial sequelae of cesarean delivery: review and analysis of their causes and implications.

    Marci Lobel;Robyn Stein DeLuca

  • Vulnerability and resilience to pandemic-related stress among U.S. women pregnant at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Heidi Preis;Brittain Mahaffey;Cassandra Heiselman;Marci Lobel

  • Explaining racial disparities in adverse birth outcomes: unique sources of stress for Black American women.

    Lisa Rosenthal;Marci Lobel

  • A Test of the Sport Commitment Model Using Structural Equation Modeling

    Paul J. Carpenter;Tara K. Scanlan;Jeffery P. Simons;Marci Lobel

  • Emotional distress following genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a meta-analytic review.

    Jada G. Hamilton;Marci Lobel;Anne Moyer

  • Psychological Reactions to Infertility

    Christine Dunkel-Schetter;Marci Lobel

  • Race and Gender Matter: A Multidimensional Approach to Conceptualizing and Measuring Stress in African American Women

    Cheryl L. Woods-Giscombé;Marci Lobel

  • Glowing Praise and the Envious Gaze: Social Dilemmas Surrounding the Public Recognition of Achievement

    Julie Juola Exline;Peg Boyle Single;Marci Lobel;Anne L. Geyer

  • A review and psychometric evaluation of pregnancy-specific stress measures.

    Fiona Alderdice;Fiona Lynn;Marci Lobel

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie J. Exline
Julie J. Exline Case Western Reserve University
Anne Moyer
Anne Moyer Stony Brook University
Sheri R. Levy
Sheri R. Levy Stony Brook University
Cindy-Lee Dennis
Cindy-Lee Dennis University of Toronto
Christine Dunkel Schetter
Christine Dunkel Schetter University of California, Los Angeles
Nancy L. Collins
Nancy L. Collins University of California, Santa Barbara
Annette L. Stanton
Annette L. Stanton University of California, Los Angeles
Kenneth W. Griffin
Kenneth W. Griffin Cornell University
Giselle Corbie-Smith
Giselle Corbie-Smith University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Shelley E. Taylor
Shelley E. Taylor University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up a range of online options and career pathways in the USA. Among the most popular careers for psychology graduates is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). The process to certification varies by location, so it is important to understand the specific educational and licensing requirements in your area.

For example, you can explore how to become a bcba in Omaha, or review specific bcba certification requirements in Orlando. Each state and city may have slightly different processes for coursework, supervised experience, and examination.

If you are considering advancing your studies, understanding the Philadelphia bcba education requirements can help you plan your academic path. Meanwhile, those looking at opportunities in the southwest should review the bcba certification requirements in Phoenix.

Whether you are pursuing a clinical career or considering academic research, online education options provide flexibility and access to accredited programs nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Marci Lobel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles