World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5772 5366 3125 2834 86 32426

Nancy L. Collins publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nancy L. Collins between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nancy L. Collins published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2013. 3 of the 91 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2013. 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1990 2025

91 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nancy L. Collins: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 2
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 4
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 2
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 5
2005 1
2006 5
2007 3
2008 0
2009 0
2010 6
2011 3
2012 3
2013 9
2014 8
2015 5
2016 2
2017 5
2018 0
2019 2
2020 1
2021 3
2022 5
2023 1
2024 1
2025 2
Total 91
Download as CSV

Nancy L. Collins publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy L. Collins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 86
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nancy L. Collins D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy L. Collins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nancy L. Collins is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology with a focus on subfields including social psychology, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, human-computer interaction, and neuropsychology and physiological psychology.

Their recent scholarly work covers multiple intersecting topics. These include attachment and relationship dynamics, cultural differences and values, racial and ethnic identity research, virtual reality applications and impacts, aging and gerontology research, dementia and cognitive impairment research, as well as stroke rehabilitation and recovery.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Tamara D. Afifi, Kyle Rand, Allison P. Mazur, Delancey C. Wu, and Bianca P. Acevedo. These partnerships reflect a multidisciplinary approach across their publication record.

The scientist has contributed to several publication venues. The most frequent is Social and Personality Psychology Compass, with additional publications in Health Communication, Frontiers in Psychology, Innovation in Aging, and the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Nancy L. Collins include:

  • Using Virtual Reality to Improve the Quality of Life of Older Adults with Cognitive Impairments and their Family Members who Live at a Distance, 2022, Health Communication
  • Perceived responsiveness across cultures: The role of cultural fit in social support use, 2021, Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  • After the Honeymoon: Neural and Genetic Correlates of Romantic Love in Newlywed Marriages, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Testing the Feasibility of Virtual Reality With Older Adults With Cognitive Impairments and Their Family Members Who Live at a Distance, 2021, Innovation in Aging
  • Cognitive Training with Neurofeedback Using fNIRS Improves Cognitive Function in Older Adults, 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Best Publications

  • Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples.

    Nancy L. Collins;Stephen J. Read

  • Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review.

    Nancy L. Collins;Lynn Carol Miller

  • Working models of attachment: implications for explanation, emotion and behavior.

    Nancy L. Collins

  • A safe haven: an attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships.

    Nancy L. Collins;Brooke C. Feeney

  • Cognitive Representations of Attachment: The Content and Function of Working Models

    Nancy L. Collins

  • Attachment Styles, Emotion Regulation, and Adjustment in Adolescence

    M. Lynne Cooper;Phillip R. Shaver;Nancy L. Collins

  • A New Look at Social Support: A Theoretical Perspective on Thriving Through Relationships

    Brooke C. Feeney;Nancy L. Collins

  • Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis.

    B. Ann Bettencourt;Norman Miller

  • Social Support in Pregnancy: Psychosocial Correlates of Birth Outcomes and Postpartum Depression

    Nancy L. Collins;Christine Dunkel-Schetter;Marci Lobel;Susan C. M. Scrimshaw

  • Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: evidence from experimental and observational studies.

    Nancy L. Collins;Brooke C. Feeney

  • Optimizing Assurance: The Risk Regulation System in Relationships.

    Sandra L. Murray;John G. Holmes;Nancy L. Collins

  • Predictors of caregiving in adult intimate relationships: An attachment theoretical perspective.

    Brooke C. Feeney;Nancy L. Collins

  • Adult Attachment Styles, Perceived Social Support and Coping Strategies:

    Todd C. Ognibene;Nancy L. Collins

  • Attachment styles and internal working models of self and relationship partners.

    Phillip R. Shaver;Nancy Collins;Catherine L. Clark

  • This Paper is Embargoed until 29 August

    Brooke C. Feeney;Nancy L. Collins

  • Interpersonal mechanisms linking close relationships to health.

    Paula R. Pietromonaco;Nancy L. Collins

  • Motivations for Caregiving in Adult Intimate Relationships: Influences on Caregiving Behavior and Relationship Functioning

    Brooke C. Feeney;Nancy L. Collins

  • Working Models of Attachment and Attribution Processes in Intimate Relationships

    Nancy L. Collins;Máire B. Ford;AnaMarie C. Guichard;Lisa M. Allard

  • Prenatal health behaviors and psychosocial risk factors in pregnant women of Mexican origin: the role of acculturation.

    R. E. Zambrana;S. C. M. Scrimshaw;N. Collins;C. Dunkel-Schetter

  • Working Models of Attachment: New Developments and Emerging Themes.

    Nancy L. Collins;Anamarie C. Guichard;Maire B. Ford;Brooke C. Feeney

Frequent Co-Authors

Brooke C. Feeney
Brooke C. Feeney Carnegie Mellon University
M. Lynne Cooper
M. Lynne Cooper University of Missouri
Stephen J. Read
Stephen J. Read University of Southern California
Lucy L. Brown
Lucy L. Brown Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Ruth E. Zambrana
Ruth E. Zambrana University of Maryland, College Park
Marci Lobel
Marci Lobel Stony Brook University
Phillip R. Shaver
Phillip R. Shaver University of California, Davis
Sandra L. Murray
Sandra L. Murray University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Arthur Aron
Arthur Aron Stony Brook University
Lorne Campbell
Lorne Campbell University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to numerous rewarding careers, including roles in social work. Aspiring social workers often begin their journey by earning a relevant degree, which not only increases employability but also fulfills key state-specific licensure requirements.

Requirements for social work careers can vary by location. For example, the degree needed to be a social worker in Rhode Island may differ from other areas. Similarly, those pursuing this path should review social worker degree requirements in South Carolina to ensure they meet local standards.

Other states, such as South Dakota, have their own criteria. If you’re interested, examining the social worker degree requirements in South Dakota can help you plan your educational path. Likewise, understanding the degree needed to be a social worker in Tennessee is essential for those targeting careers there.

Many accredited universities offer flexible online programs for psychology and social work, making it easier to fulfill educational requirements and advance toward your chosen career.

Best Scientists Citing Nancy L. Collins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles