World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
11338
World Ranking
5624
National Ranking
382

Lorne Campbell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorne Campbell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 211 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lorne Campbell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorne Campbell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lorne Campbell is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with notable contributions to subfields such as Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Gender Studies.

The scientist's work encompasses a diverse range of topics. These include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology, Gender, Feminism, and Media, Sexual Function and Dysfunction Studies, Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health, as well as Digital Games and Media.

Recent publications by Lorne Campbell illustrate their active involvement in various aspects of psychological and social research. Selected recent papers include:

  • Preregistration of secondary data analysis: A template and tutorial, 2021, Meta-Psychology
  • But What's Your Partner Up to? Associations Between Relationship Quality and Pornography Use Depend on Contextual Patterns of Use Within the Couple, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • The detriments of unmet sexual ideals and buffering effect of sexual communal strength, 2021, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Reconsidering "Best Practices" for Testing the Ideal Standards Model: A Response to Eastwick, Finkel, and Simpson (2018), 2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Responses to Sexual Advances and Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships: Is Yes Good and No Bad?, 2020, Social Psychological and Personality Science

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Taylor Kohut, Kiersten Dobson, Rhonda Nicole Balzarini, William A. Fisher, and Nicolyn Charlot. This collaborative work reflects a shared focus on areas related to interpersonal relationships, sexuality, and social psychology.

Lorne Campbell's research has been published across multiple academic venues. Some of the frequent outlets for their work include Social Psychological and Personality Science, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Personality and Individual Differences, Meta-Psychology, and Frontiers in Psychology.

The scientist also has contributions to academic book publications, with at least one book titled Copies of Flemish Masters in the Hispanic World (1500-1700): "Flandes" by Substitution, published by Brepols in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: the role of attachment anxiety.

    Lorne Campbell;Jeffry A. Simpson;Jennifer Boldry;Deborah A. Kashy

  • Estimating Actor, Partner, and Interaction Effects for Dyadic Data Using PROC MIXED and HLM: A User–Friendly Guide

    Lorne Campbell;Deborah A. Kashy

  • Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples

    Bethany Butzer;Lorne Campbell

  • Adult attachment, the transition to parenthood, and depressive symptoms.

    Jeffry A. Simpson;W. Steven Rholes;Lorne Campbell;Sisi Tran

  • The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network

    Hannah Moshontz;Lorne Campbell;Charles R. Ebersole;Hans Ijzerman

  • Adult attachment and the transition to parenthood

    W. Steven Rholes;Jeffry A. Simpson;Lorne Campbell;Jami Grich

  • Pair-Bonding, Romantic Love, and Evolution: The Curious Case of Homo sapiens

    Garth J. O. Fletcher;Jeffry A. Simpson;Lorne Campbell;Nickola C. Overall

  • The Oxford handbook of close relationships

    Jeffry A. Simpson;Lorne Campbell

  • Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile

    Brian A. Nosek;Emorie D. Beck;Lorne Campbell;Jessica K. Flake

  • Ideal Standards, the Self, and Flexibility of Ideals in Close Relationships

    Lorne Campbell;Jeffry A. Simpson;Deborah A. Kashy;Garth J. O. Fletcher

  • Registered Replication Report : Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012)

    S. Bouwmeester;P. P. J. L. Verkoeijen;P. P. J. L. Verkoeijen;B. Aczel;Fernando Barbosa

  • Perceived Effects of Pornography on the Couple Relationship: Initial Findings of Open-Ended, Participant-Informed, “Bottom-Up” Research

    Taylor Kohut;William A. Fisher;Lorne Campbell

  • Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes

    Lorne Campbell;Jeffry A. Simpson;Jennifer G. Boldry;Harris Rubin

  • Attachment Orientations, Dependence, and Behavior in a Stressful Situation: An Application of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model

    Lorne Campbell;Jeffry A. Simpson;Deborah A. Kashy;W. Steven Rholes

  • Day-to-Day Changes in Intimacy Predict Heightened Relationship Passion, Sexual Occurrence, and Sexual Satisfaction A Dyadic Diary Analysis

    Harris Rubin;Lorne Campbell

  • Links between attachment orientations and dispositional and diary–based measures of disclosure in dating couples: A study of actor and partner effects

    Steven A. Bradford;Judith A. Feeney;Lorne Campbell

  • Changes in attachment orientations across the transition to parenthood

    Jeffry A. Simpson;W. Steven Rholes;Lorne Campbell;Carol L. Wilson

  • An observational study of humor use while resolving conflict in dating couples

    Lorne Campbell;Rod A. Martin;Jennie R. Ward

  • The use and effects of pornography in romantic relationships

    Lorne Campbell;Taylor Kohut

  • Surveying Pornography Use: A Shaky Science Resting on Poor Measurement Foundations.

    Taylor Kohut;Rhonda N. Balzarini;William A. Fisher;Joshua B. Grubbs

  • Registered Replication Report: Study 1 From Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, & Hannon (2002)

    I. Cheung;L. Campbell;E. P. LeBel;R. A. Ackerman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffry A. Simpson
Jeffry A. Simpson University of Minnesota
Ronald D. Rogge
Ronald D. Rogge University of Rochester
James K. McNulty
James K. McNulty Florida State University
Nickola C. Overall
Nickola C. Overall University of Auckland
Garth J. O. Fletcher
Garth J. O. Fletcher Victoria University of Wellington
Arthur Aron
Arthur Aron Stony Brook University
Deborah A. Kashy
Deborah A. Kashy Michigan State University
Catrin Finkenauer
Catrin Finkenauer Utrecht University
W. Steven Rholes
W. Steven Rholes Texas A&M University
Eiko I. Fried
Eiko I. Fried Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to many flexible learning options and diverse career pathways. Online psychology programs are now widely available, providing convenience for students balancing work or family commitments. Choosing the right program is important. For example, prospective students in Arizona can explore the best psychology program rankings in Phoenix to find top universities and compare offerings locally.

Similarly, those interested in North Carolina’s research-driven environment may find the best psychology degree rankings in Raleigh useful. In the western region, the best psychology program rankings in Reno highlight key options for Nevada students. For learners in the Midwest, the best psychology degree rankings in South Dakota provide insights into leading local institutions.

Earning a psychology degree—whether online or campus-based—can lead to fulfilling careers in counseling, human resources, education, or mental health services. By carefully researching options by region and program type, students can select a pathway that supports their professional and personal goals.

Best Scientists Citing Lorne Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles