World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
9784
World Ranking
8097
National Ranking
4341

Ronald D. Rogge publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald D. Rogge sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ronald D. Rogge D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald D. Rogge sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald D. Rogge is affiliated with the University of Rochester in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the field of Psychology, with 74 publications attributed to this area. Their work spans several subfields including Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Education.

Their research covers a range of topics, including:

  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Resilience and Mental Health

Rogge has contributed to a variety of recent publications. Some notable examples include:

  • "Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Psychological flexibility and inflexibility as sources of resiliency and risk during a pandemic: Modeling the cascade of COVID-19 stress on family systems with a contextual behavioral science lens," 2020, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
  • "The role of financial strain in college students' work hours, sleep, and mental health," 2020, Journal of American College Health
  • "Examining the correlates of psychological flexibility in romantic relationship and family dynamics: A meta-analysis," 2020, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
  • "Modeling suicide risk among parents during the COVID-19 pandemic: Psychological inflexibility exacerbates the impact of COVID-19 stressors on interpersonal risk factors for suicide," 2020, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Frequent co-authors in Rogge's work include:

  • Jack S. Peltz
  • Jennifer S. Daks
  • Harry T. Reis
  • Michael R. Maniaci
  • Dev Crasta

Rogge frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of American College Health
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Best Publications

  • Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index.

    Janette L. Funk;Ronald D. Rogge

  • The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress.

    Sean Barnes;Kirk Warren Brown;Elizabeth Krusemark;W. Keith Campbell

  • Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research.

    Michael R. Maniaci;Ronald D. Rogge

  • Disentangling Components of Flexibility via the Hexaflex Model: Development and Validation of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI).

    Jaci L. Rolffs;Ronald D. Rogge;Kelly G. Wilson

  • Problem-solving skills and affective expressions as predictors of change in marital satisfaction.

    Matthew D. Johnson;Catherine L. Cohan;Joanne Davila;Erika Lawrence

  • Till violence does us part: the differing roles of communication and aggression in predicting adverse marital outcomes.

    Ronald D. Rogge;Thomas N. Bradbury

  • Understanding relationship quality: theoretical challenges and new tools for assessment

    Frank D. Fincham;Ron Rogge

  • Clarifying links between attachment and relationship quality: hostile conflict and mindfulness as moderators.

    Maria C. Saavedra;Karina E. Chapman;Ronald D. Rogge

  • Psychological Flexibility and Inflexibility as Sources of Resiliency and Risk during a Pandemic: Modeling the Cascade of COVID-19 Stress on Family Systems with a Contextual Behavioral Science Lens

    Jennifer S. Daks;Jack S. Peltz;Ronald D. Rogge

  • Is skills training necessary for the primary prevention of marital distress and dissolution? A 3-year experimental study of three interventions

    Ronald D. Rogge;Rebecca J. Cobb;Erika Lawrence;Matthew D. Johnson

  • Predicting marital distress and dissolution: refining the two-factor hypothesis.

    Ronald D. Rogge;Thomas N. Bradbury;Kurt Hahlweg;Jochen Engl

  • The relationship between contact and attitudes: Reducing prejudice toward individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities

    Jessica M. Keith;Loisa Bennetto;Ronald D. Rogge

  • Reconsidering the Role of Conflict in Marriage

    Thomas Bradbury;Ronald Rogge;Erika Lawrence

  • The positive and negative semantic dimensions of relationship satisfaction

    Richard E. Mattson;Ronald D. Rogge;Matthew D. Johnson;Elizabeth K. B. Davidson

  • Assessing the Seeds of Relationship Decay Using Implicit Evaluations to Detect the Early Stages of Disillusionment

    Soonhee Lee;Ronald D. Rogge;Harry T. Reis

  • Positive and negative evaluation of relationships: Development and validation of the Positive-Negative Relationship Quality (PN-RQ) scale.

    Ronald D. Rogge;Frank D. Fincham;Dev Crasta;Michael R. Maniaci

  • Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (PPRS)

    Harry T. Reis;Dev Crasta;Ronald D. Rogge;Michael R. Maniaci

  • It's all about the process: Examining the convergent validity, conceptual coverage, unique predictive validity, and clinical utility of ACT process measures

    Ronald D. Rogge;Jennifer S. Daks;Brooke A. Dubler;Katherine J. Saint

  • The expression of compassionate love in everyday compassionate acts

    Harry T. Reis;Michael R. Maniaci;Ronald D. Rogge

  • The role of financial strain in college students' work hours, sleep, and mental health.

    Jack S. Peltz;Jamie S. Bodenlos;Julie N. Kingery;Ronald D. Rogge

  • Keeping secrets from parents: daily variations among poor, urban adolescents.

    Judith G. Smetana;Myriam Villalobos;Ronald D. Rogge;Marina Tasopoulos-Chan

  • Engagement, Alignment, and Rigor as Vital Signs of High-Quality Instruction: A Classroom Visit Protocol for Instructional Improvement and Research

    Diane M. Early;Ronald D. Rogge;Edward L. Deci

Frequent Co-Authors

James K. McNulty
James K. McNulty Florida State University
Lorne Campbell
Lorne Campbell University of Western Ontario
Harry T. Reis
Harry T. Reis University of Rochester
Thomas N. Bradbury
Thomas N. Bradbury University of California, Los Angeles
Erika Lawrence
Erika Lawrence Northwestern University
Melissa L. Sturge-Apple
Melissa L. Sturge-Apple University of Rochester
Frank D. Fincham
Frank D. Fincham Florida State University
Utpal Banerjee
Utpal Banerjee University of California, Los Angeles
Thomas G. O'Connor
Thomas G. O'Connor University of Rochester
Kelly G. Wilson
Kelly G. Wilson University of Mississippi

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology degree can open up a wide range of rewarding careers. When considering online or in-person programs, it's essential to weigh factors like accreditation, curriculum, flexibility, and cost. Certain regions offer outstanding value in psychology education, making them appealing for both local and remote students.

Students seeking the most valuable psychology degrees in Phoenix benefit from diverse specializations suited to local workforce needs. Similarly, those interested in the best value psychology degrees in Raleigh will discover affordable programs with excellent post-graduate prospects.

For students looking in the Midwest, the most valuable psychology programs in St. Louis stand out for their high ROI and quality faculty. In the Southeast, the best value psychology programs in South Carolina offer a supportive atmosphere and strong career pathways.

No matter your location, these valuable online psychology degrees can lead to careers in counseling, human resources, research, or therapy. By targeting accredited, well-ranked institutions, you can maximize your professional opportunities and long-term earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald D. Rogge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles