World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
5995
World Ranking
9808
National Ranking
4133

Stephen R. Ellis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen R. Ellis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 203 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stephen R. Ellis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen R. Ellis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen R. Ellis is affiliated with the Ames Research Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, including engineering, psychology, and computer science. The scientist's work integrates these disciplines to explore complex interactions between technology and human behavior.

Ellis's main fields of study include:

  • Engineering
  • Psychology
  • Computer Science

The scientist has focused on several subfields, notably:

  • Social Psychology
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Media Technology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Research topics prominently addressed by Ellis cover:

  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Aerospace and Aviation Technology
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies
  • Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents

Ellis has contributed to scholarly publications appearing in venues such as:

  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Notable recent papers include:

  • "A Simple Video-Based Technique for Measuring Latency in Virtual Reality or Teleoperation," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Public perception of metaverse and mental health on Twitter: A sentiment analysis," 2022, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts are:

  • Ilja T. Feldstein
  • Chayakrit Krittanawong
  • Ameesh Isath
  • Craig L. Katz
  • Scott Kaplin

Best Publications

  • Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments

    Stephen R. Ellis

  • What are virtual environments

    S.R. Ellis

  • The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception

    J. Adam Jones;J. Edward Swan;Gurjot Singh;Eric Kolstad

  • Quantitative Evaluation of Perspective and Stereoscopic Displays in Three-Axis Manual Tracking Tasks

    Won S. Kim;Stephen R. Ellis;Mitchell E. Tyler;Blake Hannaford

  • Statistical dependency in visual scanning

    S R Ellis;L Stark

  • The effect of perspective geometry on judged direction in spatial information instruments

    M W McGreevy;S R Ellis

  • Presence of mind: A reaction to thomas sheridan's “further musings on the psychophysics of presence”

    Stephen R. Ellis

  • Perceptual sensitivity to head tracking latency in virtual environments with varying degrees of scene complexity

    Katerina Mania;Bernard D. Adelstein;Stephen R. Ellis;Michael I. Hill

  • Nature and origins of virtual environments: a bibliographical essay

    Unknown

  • A comparison of position and rate control for telemanipulations with consideration of manipulator system dynamics

    Won Kim;F. Tendick;S. Ellis;L. Stark

  • Generalizeability of Latency Detection in a Variety of Virtual Environments

    Stephen R. Ellis;Katerina Mania;Bernard D. Adelstein;Michael I. Hill

  • Telerobotics: Display, control, and communication problems

    L. Stark;Won-Soo Kim;F. Tendick;B. Hannaford

  • Eye Movements during the Viewing of Necker Cubes

    Stephen R Ellis;Lawrence Stark

  • Head Tracking Latency in Virtual Environments: Psychophysics and a Model:

    Bernard D. Adelstein;Thomas G. Lee;Stephen R. Ellis

  • Localization of virtual objects in the near visual field.

    Stephen R. Ellis;Brian M. Menges

  • Calculus of Nonrigid Surfaces for Geometry and Texture Manipulation

    S.D. Young;B.D. Adelstein;S.R. Ellis

  • Spatial Displays and Spatial Instruments

    Stephen R. Ellis;Mary K. Kaiser;Arthur J. Grunwald

  • Using virtual menus in a virtual environment

    Richard H. Jacoby;Stephen R. Ellis

  • Matching and Reaching Depth Judgments with Real and Augmented Reality Targets

    J. Edward Swan;Gurjot Singh;Stephen R. Ellis

  • Demand Characteristics in Assessing Motion Sickness in a Virtual Environment: Or Does Taking a Motion Sickness Questionnaire Make You Sick?

    Sean D. Young;Bernard D. Adelstein;Stephen R. Ellis

  • Factors influencing operator interaction with virtual objects viewed via head-mounted see-through displays: viewing conditions and rendering latency

    S.R. Ellis;F. Breant;B. Manges;R. Jacoby

  • Dynamic response of electromagnetic spatial displacement trackers

    Bernard D. Adelstein;Eric R. Johnston;Stephen R. Ellis

  • Localization of Virtual Objects in the Near Visual Field (Operator Interaction with Simple Virtual Objects)

    Stephen R. Ellis;Brian M. Menges

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Edward Swan
J. Edward Swan Mississippi State University
Lawrence Stark
Lawrence Stark University of California, Berkeley
Blake Hannaford
Blake Hannaford University of Washington
Li Li
Li Li University of Queensland
Anders Ynnerman
Anders Ynnerman Linköping University
Joseph L. Gabbard
Joseph L. Gabbard Virginia Tech
Andrew B. Watson
Andrew B. Watson Apple (United States)
Sean D. Young
Sean D. Young University of California, Irvine
Joseph N. S. Eisenberg
Joseph N. S. Eisenberg University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Fredrik Gustafsson
Fredrik Gustafsson Linköping University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many related online degrees and diverse career options. If you’re interested in combining technology with environmental impact, consider exploring what you can do with an environmental science degree. This field connects computing skills with research, sustainability, and conservation efforts.

For those looking to complete their studies at a faster pace, the computer science accelerated program options offer intensive, flexible learning. These programs are ideal for motivated students keen to launch their tech careers quickly.

Engineering pathways are another excellent fit for computer science enthusiasts. Consider degrees such as the environmental engineering degrees online, which blend programming with problem-solving for real-world challenges. Similarly, those interested in mechanical systems and design can find value in the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online programs, providing a cost-effective route to an engineering career.

Each of these pathways can lead to rewarding roles in technology, engineering, sustainability, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen R. Ellis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles