World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 17123 16097 8578 7929 351 23042

Jack A. Taylor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jack A. Taylor between 1967 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jack A. Taylor published across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2023. 38 of the 461 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2023. 1967: 3 publications 1968: 2 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 2 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 6 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 36 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 56 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 13 publications
1967 2025

461 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jack A. Taylor: publications per year, 1967 to 2025
Year Publications
1967 3
1968 2
1969 2
1970 1
1971 2
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 2
1977 0
1978 2
1979 1
1980 6
1981 0
1982 0
1983 3
1984 1
1985 3
1986 1
1987 4
1988 6
1989 6
1990 5
1991 3
1992 9
1993 7
1994 6
1995 5
1996 8
1997 4
1998 6
1999 4
2000 3
2001 6
2002 7
2003 12
2004 5
2005 5
2006 7
2007 10
2008 8
2009 8
2010 4
2011 13
2012 8
2013 12
2014 16
2015 8
2016 15
2017 13
2018 7
2019 36
2020 15
2021 31
2022 15
2023 56
2024 25
2025 13
Total 461
Download as CSV

Jack A. Taylor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack A. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 351 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 351
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jack A. Taylor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack A. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jack A. Taylor is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with particular contributions in genetics, molecular biology, and oncology. The scope of their work includes pulmonary and respiratory medicine, as well as pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The scientist's publications cover a variety of topics with a strong focus on epigenetics and DNA methylation, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, genetic associations and epidemiology, and global cancer incidence and screening. Their research also extends to birth, development, and health, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, and prostate cancer treatment and research.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk Among Carriers of Germline Pathogenic Variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2, 2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Capturing carbon dioxide from air with charged-sorbents, 2024, Nature
  • Associations of Body Composition and Physical Activity Level With Multiple Measures of Epigenetic Age Acceleration, 2020, American Journal of Epidemiology
  • Association of Neighborhood Deprivation With Epigenetic Aging Using 4 Clock Metrics, 2020, JAMA Network Open

Frequent coauthors in Jack A. Taylor's research include:

  • Dale P. Sandler
  • Zongli Xu
  • Esther M. John
  • Katie M. O'Brien
  • Jeannette T. Bensen

Jack A. Taylor's work has been published in various venues. The most common publication outlets are:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Urology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Best Publications

  • Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci

    Kyriaki Michailidou;Kyriaki Michailidou;Sara Lindström;Sara Lindström;Joe Dennis;Jonathan Beesley

  • Genetic Risk and Carcinogen Exposure: a Common Inherited Defect of the Carcinogen-Metabolism Gene Glutathione S-Transferase M1 (GSTM1) That Increases Susceptibility to Bladder Cancer

    Douglas A. Bell;Jack A. Taylor;David F. Paulson;Cary N. Robertson

  • DNA Methylation in Newborns and Maternal Smoking in Pregnancy: Genome-wide Consortium Meta-analysis

    Bonnie R. Joubert;Janine F. Felix;Paul Yousefi;Kelly M. Bakulski

  • SNPinfo: integrating GWAS and candidate gene information into functional SNP selection for genetic association studies

    Zongli Xu;Jack A. Taylor

  • Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes

    Nasim Mavaddat;Kyriaki Michailidou;Kyriaki Michailidou;Joe Dennis;Michael Lush

  • A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer

    Chunling Hu;Steven N Hart;Rohan Gnanaolivu;Hongyan Huang

  • Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population-based case-control studies

    Walter W. Piegorsch;Clarice R. Weinberg;Jack A. Taylor

  • Cadmium is a mutagen that acts by inhibiting mismatch repair

    Yong Hwan Jin;Alan B Clark;Robbert J C Slebos;Hanan Al-Refai

  • Folic acid supplements and risk of facial clefts: national population based case-control study

    Allen J Wilcox;Rolv Terje Lie;Kari Solvoll;Jack Taylor

  • A multi-stage genome-wide association study of bladder cancer identifies multiple susceptibility loci

    Nathaniel Rothman;Montserrat Garcia-Closas;Nilanjan Chatterjee;Nuria Malats

  • Identification of 12 new susceptibility loci for different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer

    Catherine M Phelan;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Jonathan P Tyrer;Siddhartha P Kar

  • Association of Prostate Cancer with Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism

    Jack A. Taylor;Ari Hirvonen;Mary Watson;Gary Pittman

  • Genotype/phenotype discordance for human arylamine N-acetyltransferase (NAT2) reveals a new slow-acetylator allele common in African-Americans.

    D. A. Bell;J. A. Taylor;M. A. Butler;E. A. Stephens

  • Origins and functional consequences of somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in human cancer

    Y S Ju;L B Alexandrov;M Gerstung;I Martincorena

  • Increased risk for myelodysplastic syndromes in individuals with glutathione transferase theta 1 (GSTT1) gene defect

    H.W Chen;D.P Sandler;J.A Taylor;D.A Bell

  • ENmix: a novel background correction method for Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip.

    Zongli Xu;Liang Niu;Leping Li;Jack A. Taylor

  • Identification of ten variants associated with risk of estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer.

    Roger L Milne;Roger L Milne;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Kyriaki Michailidou;Kyriaki Michailidou;Jonathan Beesley

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 32 novel breast cancer susceptibility loci from overall and subtype-specific analyses

    Haoyu Zhang;Haoyu Zhang;Thomas U. Ahearn;Julie Lecarpentier;Daniel Barnes

  • Trans-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of prostate cancer identifies new susceptibility loci and informs genetic risk prediction

    David V. Conti;Burcu F. Darst;Lilit C. Moss;Edward J. Saunders

  • The OncoArray Consortium: A Network for Understanding the Genetic Architecture of Common Cancers.

    Christopher I. Amos;Joe Dennis;Zhaoming Wang;Jinyoung Byun

Frequent Co-Authors

Dale P. Sandler
Dale P. Sandler National Institutes of Health
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne
Clarice R. Weinberg
Clarice R. Weinberg National Institutes of Health
Roger L. Milne
Roger L. Milne Cancer Council Victoria
Hiltrud Brauch
Hiltrud Brauch German Cancer Research Center
Esther M. John
Esther M. John Stanford University
Melissa C. Southey
Melissa C. Southey Monash University
Christopher A. Haiman
Christopher A. Haiman University of Southern California
Alicja Wolk
Alicja Wolk Karolinska Institute
Peter A. Fasching
Peter A. Fasching University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine or healthcare, exploring online degrees can be a flexible and affordable starting point. Many students begin their journey by researching what is the cheapest online college for nursing? to balance both cost and convenience. Online nursing programs allow you to study at your own pace, often while working or managing other commitments.

For registered nurses aiming to advance their education, seeking out the cheapest rn to bsn program online can enhance career prospects without overwhelming financial strain. Those dedicated to research or academia may consider online nursing phd programs, which allow for specialization and leadership opportunities in the field.

Additionally, applicants without a nursing background can explore flexible msn direct entry programs online. These programs offer an accelerated path into advanced nursing roles, even for those holding a non-nursing bachelor’s degree. Exploring these online pathways helps many students find the right fit for their academic and professional goals in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Jack A. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles