World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sarah H. Creem-Regehr

Sarah H. Creem-Regehr

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4443 4108 2115 1919 192 7417
Computer Science 42 8403 8166 3600 3464 181 7271

Sarah H. Creem-Regehr publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sarah H. Creem-Regehr between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sarah H. Creem-Regehr published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2010. 22 of the 222 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2010. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 12 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 25 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 13 publications
2002 2025

222 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sarah H. Creem-Regehr: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 1
2004 12
2005 5
2006 2
2007 8
2008 7
2009 5
2010 25
2011 5
2012 8
2013 5
2014 6
2015 13
2016 7
2017 7
2018 11
2019 14
2020 12
2021 22
2022 18
2023 5
2024 9
2025 13
Total 222
Download as CSV

Sarah H. Creem-Regehr publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah H. Creem-Regehr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 184–193 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 192 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319 192
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Sarah H. Creem-Regehr D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah H. Creem-Regehr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Sarah H. Creem-Regehr is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research encompasses multiple fields including Computer Science, Neuroscience, and Engineering. The subfields they have contributed to include Cognitive Neuroscience, Automotive Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Social Psychology.

Their work focuses on several main topics, notably Spatial Cognition and Navigation, Visual Perception and Processing Mechanisms, Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Augmented Reality Applications, Tactile and Sensory Interactions, Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies, and Multisensory Perception and Integration.

Recent significant publications by Sarah H. Creem-Regehr include:

  • Depth Perception in Augmented Reality: The Effects of Display, Shadow, and Position (2022) published in the 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
  • Perceiving distance in virtual reality: theoretical insights from contemporary technologies (2022) published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Effects of home environment structure on navigation preference and performance: A comparison in Veneto, Italy and Utah, USA (2021) published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • Evaluating Augmented Reality Landmark Cues and Frame of Reference Displays with Virtual Reality (2023) published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Estimating Distances in Action Space in Augmented Reality (2021) published in ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

The most frequent publication venues for this researcher are the Journal of Vision, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, Experimental Brain Research, and the 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct).

Frequent co-authors working with Sarah H. Creem-Regehr include Jeanine K. Stefanucci, Bobby Bodenheimer, Erica M. Barhorst-Cates, Holly Gagnon, and Corey S. Shayman.

Best Publications

  • Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments

    William B. Thompson;Peter Willemsen;Amy A. Gooch;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr

  • Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed

    Betty J. Mohler;William B. Thompson;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;Herbert L. Pick

  • Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special?

    Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;James N. Lee

  • The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: implications for real and virtual indoor environments.

    Sarah H Creem-Regehr;Peter Willemsen;Amy A Gooch;William B Thompson

  • Decision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disciplines

    Lace M. Padilla;Lace M. Padilla;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;Mary Hegarty;Jeanine K. Stefanucci

  • The effect of viewing a self-avatar on distance judgments in an hmd-based virtual environment

    Betty J. Mohler;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;William B. Thompson;Heinrich H. Bülthoff

  • Effects of stereo viewing conditions on distance perception in virtual environments

    Peter Willemsen;Amy A. Gooch;William B. Thompson;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr

  • The effects of head-mounted display mechanical properties and field of view on distance judgments in virtual environments

    Peter Willemsen;Mark B. Colton;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;William B. Thompson

  • HMD calibration and its effects on distance judgments

    Scott A. Kuhl;William B. Thompson;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr

  • Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in similar real and virtual environments

    Cynthia S. Sahm;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;William B. Thompson;Peter Willemsen

  • The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments

    Betty J. Mohler;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;William B. Thompson

  • Visual Perception from a Computer Graphics Perspective

    William Thompson;Roland Fleming;Sarah Creem-Regehr;Jeanine Kelly Stefanucci

  • The effects of head-mounted display mechanics on distance judgments in virtual environments

    Peter Willemsen;Mark B. Colton;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;William B. Thompson

  • Non-expert interpretations of hurricane forecast uncertainty visualizations

    Ian T. Ruginski;Alexander P. Boone;Lace M. K. Padilla;Le Liu

  • Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: A comparison of verbal reports and blind walking

    Benjamin R. Kunz;Leah Wouters;Daniel Smith;William B. Thompson

  • Spatial updating of virtual displays

    Maryjane Wraga;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;Dennis R. Proffitt

  • Calibration of locomotion resulting from visual motion in a treadmill-based virtual environment

    Betty J. Mohler;William B. Thompson;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;Peter Willemsen

  • Neural correlates of two imagined egocentric transformations

    Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;Jayson A. Neil;Hsiang J. Yeh

  • GPS use negatively affects environmental learning through spatial transformation abilities

    Ian T. Ruginski;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr;Jeanine K. Stefanucci;Elizabeth Cashdan

  • Face-based luminance matching for perceptual colormap generation

    Gordon Kindlmann;Erik Reinhard;Sarah Creem

  • Effects of ensemble and summary displays on interpretations of geospatial uncertainty data

    Lace M. Padilla;Ian T. Ruginski;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr

  • Sensory-motor and cognitive functions of the human posterior parietal cortex involved in manual actions.

    Sarah H. Creem-Regehr

Frequent Co-Authors

William B. Thompson
William B. Thompson University of Utah
Jeanine K. Stefanucci
Jeanine K. Stefanucci University of Utah
Bobby Bodenheimer
Bobby Bodenheimer Vanderbilt University
Betty J. Mohler
Betty J. Mohler Amazon (United States)
Mary Hegarty
Mary Hegarty University of California, Santa Barbara
John J. Rieser
John J. Rieser Vanderbilt University
Miriah Meyer
Miriah Meyer University of Utah
Karol Myszkowski
Karol Myszkowski Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Jack M. Loomis
Jack M. Loomis University of California, Santa Barbara
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities can open diverse and rewarding career opportunities. Many students are now choosing flexible education options, making online degrees increasingly popular for those balancing work or family commitments.

For those interested in counseling, pursuing cacrep-accredited programs online ensures your education meets industry standards and enhances your eligibility for professional licensure. If you are passionate about helping families and couples, specialized marriage and family therapy master's programs provide focused training for rewarding roles in therapy and support services.

Another in-demand field is psychology. Earning your psychology degrees online gives you the flexibility to build foundational knowledge and explore specializations, such as clinical, school, or industrial-organizational psychology. Additionally, individuals seeking a career in social work can take advantage of easiest online msw program options, making advanced education more accessible and affordable.

With these pathways, graduates can make a meaningful impact in their communities while enjoying varied career prospects and the convenience of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah H. Creem-Regehr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles