World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Phillip F. Gardiner

Phillip F. Gardiner

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
6126
World Ranking
8764
National Ranking
516

Phillip F. Gardiner publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip F. Gardiner sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 156 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Phillip F. Gardiner D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip F. Gardiner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Muscle architecture and force-velocity characteristics of cat soleus and medial gastrocnemius: implications for motor control

    S. A. Spector;P. F. Gardiner;R. F. Zernicke;R. R. Roy

  • Skeletal Muscle: Form and Function

    Brian R. MacIntosh;Phillip F. Gardiner;Alan J. McComas

  • A Physical Activity Program Improves Behavior and Cognitive Functions in Children with ADHD: An Exploratory Study.

    Claudia Verret;Marie-Claude Guay;Claude Berthiaume;Phillip Gardiner

  • Insight into skeletal muscle mechanotransduction: MAPK activation is quantitatively related to tension

    Louis C. Martineau;Phillip F. Gardiner

  • Physiological properties of motoneurons innervating different muscle unit types in rat gastrocnemius.

    P. F. Gardiner

  • Effects of exercise training on α-motoneurons

    P. Gardiner;Y. Dai;C. J. Heckman

  • Contractile and electromyographic characteristics of rat plantaris motor unit types during fatigue in situ.

    P F Gardiner;A E Olha

  • Effects of daily spontaneous running on the electrophysiological properties of hindlimb motoneurones in rats

    Eric Beaumont;Phillip Gardiner

  • Neuromuscular Aspects of Physical Activity

    Phillip F. Gardiner

  • Endurance training alters the biophysical properties of hindlimb motoneurons in rats.

    Eric Beaumont;Phillip F. Gardiner;Phillip F. Gardiner

  • Passive exercise and fetal spinal cord transplant both help to restore motoneuronal properties after spinal cord transection in rats.

    Eric Beaumont;John D. Houlé;Charlotte A. Peterson;Phillip F. Gardiner;Phillip F. Gardiner

  • Effects of exercise and muscle type on BDNF, NT‐4/5, and TrKB expression in skeletal muscle

    Daniel I. Ogborn;Phillip F. Gardiner

  • Hindlimb unweighting for 2 weeks alters physiological properties of rat hindlimb motoneurones.

    Bruno Cormery;Eric Beaumont;Kristina Csukly;Phillip Gardiner;Phillip Gardiner

  • Frequency–current relationships of rat hindlimb α‐motoneurones

    Duane C. Button;Kalan Gardiner;Tanguy Marqueste;Phillip F. Gardiner

  • Acetylcholinesterase adaptation to voluntary wheel running is proportional to the volume of activity in fast, but not slow, rat hindlimb muscles.

    Victor Gisiger;Manon Bélisle;Phillip F. Gardiner

  • Does elimination of afferent input modify the changes in rat motoneurone properties that occur following chronic spinal cord transection

    Duane C. Button;Jayne M. Kalmar;Kalan Gardiner;Tanguy Marqueste

  • Muscle denervation promotes opening of the permeability transition pore and increases the expression of cyclophilin D

    Kristina Csukly;Alexis Ascah;Jimmy Matas;Phillip F. Gardiner

  • Effect of "disuse" on mammalian fast-twitch muscle: joint fixation compared with neurally applied tetrodotoxin.

    Diane St-Pierre;Phillip F. Gardiner

  • Effects of a mild weight-lifting program on the progress of glucocorticoid-induced atrophy in rat hindlimb muscles

    P F Gardiner;B Hibl;D R Simpson;R Roy

  • Fitness Level and Gross Motor Performance of Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

    Claudia Verret;Phillip Gardiner;Louise Béliveau

Frequent Co-Authors

Hui Zhong
Hui Zhong University of California, Los Angeles
David J. Bennett
David J. Bennett University of Alberta
Alan S. Hazell
Alan S. Hazell University of Montreal
Larry M. Jordan
Larry M. Jordan University of Manitoba
Karim Fouad
Karim Fouad University of Alberta
Keith T. Sillar
Keith T. Sillar University of St Andrews
Charles J. Heckman
Charles J. Heckman Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering neuroscience studies in the USA, many online options can help you fast-track your education. If you’re eager to enter the workforce quickly, explore 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees online, which allow you to complete your undergraduate degree in less time than traditional programs.

Neuroscience majors often wonder how their career prospects compare to other fields. Reviewing the top paying degrees can give insight into high-earning fields and help you make informed decisions about potential double majors or career shifts. Additionally, students who value both fulfillment and a solid paycheck might want to consider some of the fun majors in college that pay well, many of which incorporate elements of psychology, healthcare, and technology.

Affordability is also key. Prospective neuroscience students should research online school that accepts fafsa to find programs eligible for federal student aid, making higher education more accessible and budget-friendly.

Best Scientists Citing Phillip F. Gardiner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles