World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
11199
World Ranking
4702
National Ranking
2122

Douglas G. Stuart publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas G. Stuart sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 150 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Douglas G. Stuart D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas G. Stuart sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1976 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Douglas G. Stuart was affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research contributions spanned multiple fields, including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Medicine, and Engineering. Their work intersected notable subfields such as Molecular Biology, Genetics, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientific topics addressed by Stuart covered areas related to muscle physiology and disorders, neurogenetic and muscular disorders research, as well as prosthetics and rehabilitation robotics. These topics reflect a broad interdisciplinary focus on both biological mechanisms and applied biomedical technologies.

Among the peer-reviewed publications attributed to Stuart, a key recent paper is titled "Adult North Star Network (ANSN): Consensus Document for Therapists Working with Adults with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) - Therapy Guidelines," published in 2022 in the Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases.

Stuart frequently collaborated with several researchers across their projects. Common coauthors included Suni Narayan, A. Pietrusz, Jodi Allen, M. DiMarco, and Kirsty Docherty.

Their work was primarily published in venues such as the Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases, which aligns with their research emphasis on muscular dystrophy and related neuromuscular conditions.

In 1976, Stuart was recognized as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, acknowledging their contributions within their scientific domains.

  • Adult North Star Network (ANSN): Consensus Document for Therapists Working with Adults with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) - Therapy Guidelines (2022, Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases)

  • Suni Narayan
  • A. Pietrusz
  • Jodi Allen
  • M. DiMarco
  • Kirsty Docherty

  • Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases

  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine
  • Engineering

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Biomedical Engineering

  • Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (1976)

Best Publications

  • Neurobiology of muscle fatigue.

    R. M. Enoka;D. G. Stuart

  • The cat step cycle: Hind limb joint angles and muscle lengths during unrestrained locomotion

    George E. Goslow;George E. Goslow;Robert M. Reinking;Robert M. Reinking;Douglas G. Stuart;Douglas G. Stuart

  • Functional anatomy of the association between motor units and muscle receptors

    Barry R. Botterman;Marc D. Binder;Douglas G. Stuart

  • Ensemble Characteristics of Cat Locomotion and Its Neural Control

    Mary C. Wetzel;Douglas G. Stuart

  • On the function of muscle and reflex partitioning

    Uwe Windhorst;Thomas M. Hamm;Douglas G. Stuart

  • The motor units of cat medial gastrocnemius: Electrical and mechanical properties as a function of muscle length

    John A. Stephens;Robert M. Reinking;Douglas G. Stuart

  • Neurobiology of Vertebrate Locomotion

    Sten Grillner;Paul S. G. Stein;Douglas G. Stuart;Hans Forssberg

  • Analysis of muscle receptor connections by spike-triggered averaging. 2. Spindle group II afferents.

    E. K. Stauffer;D. G. Watt;A. Taylor;R. M. Reinking

  • The response of Golgi tendon organs to single motor unit contractions.

    M D Binder;J S Kroin;G P Moore;D G Stuart

  • Distribution of sensory receptors in the flexor carpi radialis muscle of the cat.

    Frances J. R. Richmond;Douglas G. Stuart

  • "Sensory partitioning" of cat medial gastrocnemius muscle by its muscle spindles and tendon organs.

    W. E. Cameron;M. D. Binder;B. R. Botterman;R. M. Reinking

  • Analysis of muscle receptor connections by spike-triggered averaging. 1. Spindle primary and tendon organ afferents

    D. G. Watt;E. K. Stauffer;A. Taylor;R. M. Reinking

  • Henneman's ‘size principle’: current issues

    Roger M. Enoka;Douglas G. Stuart

  • Partitioning of monosynaptic Ia EPSP connections with motoneurons according to neuromuscular topography: generality and functional implications

    Douglas G. Stuart;Thomas M. Hamm;Sharyn Vanden Noven

  • Localization of monosynaptic Ia excitatory post‐synaptic potentials in the motor nucleus of the cat biceps femoris muscle.

    Barry R Botterman;T. M. Hamm;R. M. Reinking;D. G. Stuart

  • Partitioning of monosynaptic Ia excitatory postsynaptic potentials in the motor nucleus of the cat lateral gastrocnemius muscle.

    S. Vanden Noven;T. M. Hamm;D. G. Stuart

  • The measurement of single motor-axon recurrent inhibitory post-synaptic potentials in the cat.

    T M Hamm;S Sasaki;D G Stuart;U Windhorst

  • A long propriospinal system with direct effect on motoneurones and on interneurones in the cat lumbosacral cord.

    E. Jankowska;A. Lundberg;W. J. Roberts;D. Stuart

  • Propriospinal control of last order interneurones of spinal reflex pathways in the cat.

    E. Jankowska;A. Lundberg;D. Stuart

  • Correlation analysis of muscle spindle responses to single motor unit contractions.

    M D Binder;J S Kroin;G P Moore;E K Stauffer

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger M. Enoka
Roger M. Enoka University of Colorado Boulder
Marc D. Binder
Marc D. Binder University of Washington
Simon C. Gandevia
Simon C. Gandevia Neuroscience Research Australia
Robert M. Brownstone
Robert M. Brownstone University College London
François Clarac
François Clarac Aix-Marseille University
Christine K. Thomas
Christine K. Thomas University of Miami
Michael A. Nordstrom
Michael A. Nordstrom University of Adelaide
Hans Hultborn
Hans Hultborn University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Douglas G. Stuart