World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
5397
World Ranking
9176
National Ranking
3876

T. Richard Nichols publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Richard Nichols sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 105 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

T. Richard Nichols D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Richard Nichols sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

T. Richard Nichols is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on engineering and medicine, with a strong emphasis on biomedical engineering and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's work addresses several interconnected topics, including muscle activation and electromyography studies, spinal cord injury research, and motor control and adaptation. Additional areas of study include veterinary orthopedics and neurology, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, advanced sensor and energy harvesting materials, and nerve injury and rehabilitation.

Recent publications by Nichols demonstrate a range of investigations into neurophysiological and motor control mechanisms. These papers include:

  • Reduced inhibition from quadriceps onto soleus after acute quadriceps fatigue suggests Golgi tendon organ contribution to heteronymous inhibition, 2024, European Journal of Neuroscience
  • Redistribution of inhibitory force feedback between a long toe flexor and the major ankle extensor muscles following spinal cord injury, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience Research
  • Parametric control of limb mechanics is accomplished in the spinal cord by parallel-distributed processing, 2021, Physics of Life Reviews
  • Role of forelimb morphology in muscle sensorimotor functions during locomotion in the cat, 2024, The Journal of Physiology
  • Non-uniform upregulation of the autogenic stretch reflex among hindlimb extensors following lateral spinal lesion in the cat, 2021, Experimental Brain Research

Their frequent coauthors include Mark A. Lyle, Seyed Mohammadali Rahmati, Alexander N. Klishko, Ramaldo S. Martin, and Nate E. Bunderson.

Publishing in various neurophysiology and biomedical science journals, Nichols has contributed to venues such as the European Journal of Neuroscience, The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Neuroscience Research, Physics of Life Reviews, and Experimental Brain Research.

Best Publications

  • Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex.

    Unknown

  • Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control.

    Kiisa Nishikawa;Andrew A. Biewener;Andrew A. Biewener;Peter Aerts;Anna N. Ahn

  • Stable long-term recordings from cat peripheral nerves.

    R.B. Stein;T.R. Nichols;J. Jhamandas;L. Davis

  • A PDMS-Based Integrated Stretchable Microelectrode Array (isMEA) for Neural and Muscular Surface Interfacing

    Liang Guo;G. S. Guvanasen;Xi Liu;C. Tuthill

  • Local Loss of Proprioception Results in Disruption of Interjoint Coordination During Locomotion in the Cat

    Thomas A. Abelew;Melissa D. Miller;Timothy C. Cope;T. Richard Nichols

  • Cat hindlimb muscles exert substantial torques outside the sagittal plane

    J. H. Lawrence;T. R. Nichols;A. W. English

  • Rapid Spinal Mechanisms of Motor Coordination

    T. Richard Nichols;Timothy C. Cope;Thomas A. Abelew

  • Reinnervated muscles fail to produce stretch reflexes

    T. C. Cope;S. J. Bonasera;T. R. Nichols

  • Reflex Compensation for Variations in the Mechanical Properties of a Muscle

    T. Richard Nichols;James C. Houk

  • Mechanical analysis of heterogenic inhibition between soleus muscle and the pretibial flexors in the cat.

    Unknown

  • Electromyographic Responses From the Hindlimb Muscles of the Decerebrate Cat to Horizontal Support Surface Perturbations

    Claire F. Honeycutt;Jinger S. Gottschall;T. Richard Nichols;T. Richard Nichols

  • Whole limb kinematics are preferentially conserved over individual joint kinematics after peripheral nerve injury

    Young-Hui Chang;Arick G. Auyang;John P. Scholz;T. Richard Nichols

  • Receptor Mechanisms Underlying Heterogenic Reflexes Among the Triceps Surae Muscles of the Cat

    T. Richard Nichols

  • Distributed force feedback in the spinal cord and the regulation of limb mechanics

    T. Richard Nichols

  • Distribution of heterogenic reflexes among the quadriceps and triceps surae muscles of the cat hind limb.

    Ronnie J. H. Wilmink;T. Richard Nichols

  • The effects of self-reinnervation of cat medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles on hindlimb kinematics in slope walking

    Huub Maas;Huub Maas;Boris I. Prilutsky;T. Richard Nichols;T. Richard Nichols;Robert J. Gregor;Robert J. Gregor

  • Three-dimensional model of the feline hindlimb.

    Thomas J. Burkholder;T. Richard Nichols

  • Movement Reduces the Dynamic Response of Muscle Spindle Afferents and Motoneuron Synaptic Potentials in Rat

    Valerie K. Haftel;Edyta K. Bichler;T. Richard Nichols;Martin J. Pinter

  • Resetting of resultant stiffness in ankle flexor and extensor muscles in the decerebrate cat

    Unknown

  • Flexible microelectrode arrays with integrated insertion devices

    D.P. O'Brien;T.R. Nichols;M.G. Allen

  • The Decerebrate Cat Generates the Essential Features of the Force Constraint Strategy

    Claire F. Honeycutt;T. Richard Nichols

  • Heterogenic feedback between hindlimb extensors in the spontaneously locomoting premammillary cat.

    Kyla Turpin Ross;T. Richard Nichols

  • Intrinsic Properties and Reflex Compensation in Reinnervated Triceps Surae Muscles of the Cat: Effect of Activation Level

    Clotilde M.J.I. Huyghues-Despointes;Timothy C. Cope;T. Richard Nichols

  • Neuromuscular strategies for the transitions between level and hill surfaces during walking

    Jinger S. Gottschall;T. Richard Nichols

  • Muscle spindle responses to horizontal support surface perturbation in the anesthetized cat: insights into the role of autogenic feedback in whole body postural control

    Claire F. Honeycutt;Paul Nardelli;Timothy C. Cope;T. Richard Nichols

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy C. Cope
Timothy C. Cope Georgia Institute of Technology
Stephen P. DeWeerth
Stephen P. DeWeerth Lehigh University
Andrew A. Biewener
Andrew A. Biewener Harvard University
Arthur W. English
Arthur W. English Emory University
Brian L. Day
Brian L. Day University College London
James R. Lackner
James R. Lackner Brandeis University
Paul DiZio
Paul DiZio Brandeis University
Yuri P. Ivanenko
Yuri P. Ivanenko Collège de France
Roger D. Quinn
Roger D. Quinn Case Western Reserve University
Fay B. Horak
Fay B. Horak Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about neuroscience, there are several fun majors in college that pay well you might want to explore. Related fields such as psychology, biology, or data science often offer strong earning potential and exciting job opportunities, especially for those interested in brain research or healthcare.

For students looking for affordable options, there are cheap online colleges that accept fafsa. These institutions provide flexible study plans and may help you save on tuition costs while still earning a reputable degree in a neuroscience-related field.

You may also consider adding specialized skills through online certifications that pay well. Credentials in areas such as medical coding, data analysis, or health informatics can complement your degree and open up more career options in neuroscience or allied industries.

If you’re seeking the fastest path to a qualification, look into programs that rank among the easiest bachelor degree to get online. These programs can help you quickly gain the foundational knowledge and credentials needed to launch your career or pursue further study in neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing T. Richard Nichols

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles