World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
62
Citations
14497
World Ranking
3515
National Ranking
1623

James R. Lackner publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Lackner sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 230 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James R. Lackner D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Lackner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James R. Lackner is a researcher primarily affiliated with Brandeis University in the United States. Their work spans multiple areas within neuroscience, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and physical therapy, sports therapy, and rehabilitation. Research by Lackner covers topics related to visual perception, motor control, tactile and sensory interactions, balance and gait, vestibular disorders, and the biological effects of spaceflight.

Lackner has contributed to a substantial number of publications within the field of neuroscience, including 28 documented works. Their specialization includes the subfields of cognitive neuroscience, with 25 publications, as well as physical therapy, sports therapy, and rehabilitation, with 4 publications. Additional research areas include neurology, physiology, and aerospace engineering.

Frequent publication venues for Lackner's research include:

  • Experimental Brain Research
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Frontiers in Physiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Their notable recent papers include:

  • "Velocity storage: its multiple roles," 2020, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "The Importance of Being in Touch," 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • "Characterizing Individual Differences in a Dynamic Stabilization Task Using Machine Learning," 2020, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance
  • "Multiple roles of active stiffness in upright balance and multidirectional sway," 2020, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "Crash Prediction Using Deep Learning in a Disorienting Spaceflight Analog Balancing Task," 2022, Frontiers in Physiology

Lackner has collaborated frequently with several coauthors whose partnerships are evident across multiple publications. Key collaborators include:

  • Paul DiZio
  • Avijit Bakshi
  • Vivekanand Pandey Vimal
  • Alexander Sacha Panic
  • Pengyu Hong

The overall thematic focus of their research involves complex sensory and motor systems, as well as the effects of spaceflight conditions on biological functions. Key topics addressed in their work are:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Space Exploration and Technology

Best Publications

  • Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory

    James R. Lackner;Paul Dizio

  • Fingertip contact influences human postural control

    John J. Jeka;James R. Lackner

  • SOME PROPRIOCEPTIVE INFLUENCES ON THE PERCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION OF BODY SHAPE AND ORIENTATION

    James R. Lackner

  • Aftereffects and sense of presence in virtual environments: formulation of a research and development agenda.

    K. Stanney;G. Salvendy;J. Deisinger;P. DiZio

  • Vestibular, proprioceptive, and haptic contributions to spatial orientation.

    James R. Lackner;Paul DiZio

  • Coupling of fingertip somatosensory information to head and body sway

    J. J. Jeka;Gregor Schöner;Tjeerd Dijkstra;Pedro Ribeiro

  • Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting

    James R. Lackner

  • Stabilization of posture by precision contact of the index finger.

    M Holden;J Ventura;J R Lackner

  • The underlying structures of sentences are the primary units of immediate speech processing

    T. G. Bever;J. R. Lackner;R. Kirk

  • Resolving ambiguity: Effects of biasing context in the unattended ear

    J.R. Lackner;M.F. Garrett

  • The role of haptic cues from rough and slippery surfaces in human postural control.

    John J. Jeka;James R. Lackner

  • Changes in apparent body orientation and sensory localization induced by vibration of postural muscles - Vibratory myesthetic illusions

    J. R. Lackner;M. S. Levine

  • Precision contact of the fingertip reduces postural sway of individuals with bilateral vestibular loss.

    James R. Lackner;Paul DiZio;John Jeka;Fay Horak

  • Human orientation and movement control in weightless and artificial gravity environments

    James R. Lackner;Paul DiZio

  • The psychological representation of speech sounds

    James R. Lackner;James R. Lackner;Louis M. Goldstein

  • Alterations in auditory fusion thresholds after cerebral injury in man.

    James R. Lackner;H.-L. Teuber

  • Space motion sickness

    James R. Lackner;Paul DiZio

  • Auditory cues for orientation and postural control in sighted and congenitally blind people.

    Randolph D. Easton;Anthony J. Greene;Paul DiZio;James R. Lackner

  • Haptic cues for orientation and postural control in sighted and blind individuals.

    John J. Jeka;Randolph D. Easton;Billie L. Bentzen;James R. Lackner

  • Aspects of body self-calibration

    James R. Lackner;Paul A. DiZio

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul DiZio
Paul DiZio Brandeis University
John J. Jeka
John J. Jeka University of Delaware
Louis Goldstein
Louis Goldstein University of Southern California
Thomas G. Bever
Thomas G. Bever University of Arizona
Kay M. Stanney
Kay M. Stanney University of Central Florida
Alan M. Wing
Alan M. Wing University of Birmingham
Amir Amedi
Amir Amedi Reichman University
Pierre Denise
Pierre Denise Université de Caen Normandie
T. Richard Nichols
T. Richard Nichols Georgia Institute of Technology
Fay B. Horak
Fay B. Horak Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James R. Lackner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles