World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jiří Čejka

Jiří Čejka

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 86 2538 2290 12 11 554 26203

Jiří Čejka publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jiří Čejka between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jiří Čejka published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2013. 16 of the 599 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2013. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 5 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 31 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 41 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 9 publications
1973 2025

599 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jiří Čejka: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 0
1979 2
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 5
1986 0
1987 0
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 2
1992 4
1993 2
1994 5
1995 5
1996 6
1997 2
1998 11
1999 4
2000 8
2001 14
2002 12
2003 9
2004 11
2005 16
2006 9
2007 27
2008 26
2009 31
2010 31
2011 25
2012 17
2013 41
2014 34
2015 20
2016 27
2017 32
2018 25
2019 33
2020 25
2021 17
2022 19
2023 16
2024 7
2025 9
Total 599
Download as CSV

Jiří Čejka publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jiří Čejka sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 554 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148 554
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Jiří Čejka D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jiří Čejka sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254 86
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Member of the European Academy of Sciences

Overview

Jiří Čejka is affiliated with Charles University in the Czech Republic. Their research primarily focuses on materials science, chemistry, and engineering, with significant contributions in subfields such as materials chemistry, inorganic chemistry, mechanical engineering, biomedical engineering, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

Their work extensively covers topics including zeolite catalysis and synthesis, mesoporous materials and catalysis, catalytic processes in materials science, catalysis for biomass conversion, catalysis and hydrodesulfurization studies, metal-organic frameworks synthesis and applications, and chemical synthesis and characterization.

Frequent publication venues for Jiří Čejka include Catalysis Today, Applied Materials Today, SSRN Electronic Journal, The Cambridge Structural Database, and Microporous and Mesoporous Materials.

They have collaborated often with several coauthors such as Mariya Shamzhy, Michal Mazur, Maksym Opanasenko, Martin Kubů, and David P. Serrano.

Recent publications include:

  • Zeolite (In)Stability under Aqueous or Steaming Conditions, 2020, Advanced Materials
  • MWW and MFI Frameworks as Model Layered Zeolites: Structures, Transformations, Properties, and Activity, 2021, ACS Catalysis
  • Recent Advances in Tetra- (Ti, Sn, Zr, Hf) and Pentavalent (Nb, V, Ta) Metal-Substituted Molecular Sieve Catalysis, 2022, Chemical Reviews
  • Synthesis and Post-Synthesis Transformation of Germanosilicate Zeolites, 2020, Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • Liquid dispersions of zeolite monolayers with high catalytic activity prepared by soft-chemical exfoliation, 2020, Science Advances

In 2017, Jiří Čejka was recognized as a Member of the European Academy of Sciences.

Best Publications

  • Zeolites and catalysis : synthesis, reactions and applications

    Jiří Čejka;Avelino Corma;Stacey Zones

  • Two-dimensional zeolites: current status and perspectives.

    Wieslaw J. Roth;Petr Nachtigall;Russell E. Morris;Jiří Čejka

  • ACID-CATALYZED SYNTHESIS OF MONO- AND DIALKYL BENZENES OVER ZEOLITES: ACTIVE SITES, ZEOLITE TOPOLOGY, AND REACTION MECHANISMS

    Jiří Čejka;Blanka Wichterlová

  • Organized mesoporous alumina: synthesis, structure and potential in catalysis

    Jiři Čejka

  • Amine-modified ordered mesoporous silica : Effect of pore size on carbon dioxide capture

    V. Zeleňák;M. Badaničová;D. Halamová;J. Čejka

  • A family of zeolites with controlled pore size prepared using a top-down method

    Wieslaw J. Roth;Petr Nachtigall;Russell E. Morris;Paul S. Wheatley

  • Perspectives of Micro/Mesoporous Composites in Catalysis

    Jiří Čejka;Svetlana Mintova

  • Zeolite-based materials for novel catalytic applications: Opportunities, perspectives and open problems

    Jiří Čejka;Gabriele Centi;Joaquín Perez-Pariente;Wieslaw J. Roth

  • Two-dimensional zeolites: dream or reality?

    Wieslaw J. Roth;Jiří Čejka

  • Recent Advances in Catalysis Over Mesoporous Molecular Sieves

    Rosa M. Martín-Aranda;Jiří Čejka

  • From 3D to 2D zeolite catalytic materials

    J. Přech;P. Pizarro;P. Pizarro;D. P. Serrano;D. P. Serrano;J. Čejka;J. Čejka

  • The ADOR Mechanism for the Synthesis of New Zeolites

    Pavla Eliášová;Maksym Opanasenko;Paul S. Wheatley;Mariya Shamzhy

  • Synthesis, Characterization and Catalytic Applications of Organized Mesoporous Aluminas

    Carlos Márquez‐Alvarez;Naděžda Žilková;Joaquín Pérez‐Pariente;Jiří Čejka

  • Metal organic frameworks as heterogeneous catalysts for the production of fine chemicals

    Amarajothi Dhakshinamoorthy;Maksym Opanasenko;Jiří Čejka;Hermenegildo Garcia

  • Postsynthesis Transformation of Three-Dimensional Framework into a Lamellar Zeolite with Modifiable Architecture

    Wieslaw J. Roth;Oleksiy V. Shvets;Mariya Shamzhy;Pavla Chlubná

  • Metal Organic Frameworks as Solid Catalysts in Condensation Reactions of Carbonyl Groups

    Amarajothi Dhakshinamoorthy;Maksym Opanasenko;Jiří Čejka;Hermenegildo Garcia

  • Synthesis of 'unfeasible' zeolites.

    Michal Mazur;Paul S. Wheatley;Marta Navarro;Wieslaw J. Roth

  • Preparation of nanosized micro/mesoporous composites via simultaneous synthesis of Beta/MCM-48 phases

    P. Prokešová;S. Mintova;J. Čejka;T. Bein

  • Comparison of the catalytic activity of MOFs and zeolites in Knoevenagel condensation

    Maksym Opanasenko;Maksym Opanasenko;Amarajothi Dhakshinamoorthy;Mariya Shamzhy;Mariya Shamzhy;Petr Nachtigall

  • Exploiting chemically selective weakness in solids as a route to new porous materials

    Russell E. Morris;Jiří Čejka

  • Synthesis, Characterization and Catalytic Applications of Organized Mesoporous Aluminas

    Carlos Marquez‐Alvarez;Nadezda Zilkova;Joaquin Perez‐Pariente;Jiri Cejka

Frequent Co-Authors

Ray L. Frost
Ray L. Frost Queensland University of Technology
Arnošt Zukal
Arnošt Zukal Czech Academy of Sciences
Russell E. Morris
Russell E. Morris University of St Andrews
Petr Nachtigall
Petr Nachtigall Charles University
David Serrano
David Serrano IMDEA Energy Institute
Blanka Wichterlová
Blanka Wichterlová Czech Academy of Sciences
Yunfei Xi
Yunfei Xi Queensland University of Technology
Milan Novák
Milan Novák Masaryk University
Michal Dušek
Michal Dušek Czech Academy of Sciences
Barbara Gil
Barbara Gil Jagiellonian University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens the door to a variety of career paths, many of which can be bolstered by online degrees. For those interested in the healthcare sector, becoming a pharmacist is a popular choice. However, aspiring pharmacists should consider how much does it cost to become a pharmacist, as the investment in education can be significant.

Another dynamic path is pharmaceutical sales, where knowledge of Chemistry is essential for understanding the products. If you’re curious about the financial prospects in this field, reviewing the pharma sales rep salary can provide clarity on earning potential and career growth.

For those drawn to forensic applications of Chemistry, an online degree in forensic science offers a flexible education route. There are numerous programs available, but it’s wise to research the best online colleges for forensic science to find a reputable and cost-efficient option.

Additionally, working as an autopsy technician combines Chemistry knowledge with medical investigation skills. To make an informed decision, understanding the autopsy tech salary and job outlook is crucial for setting realistic career expectations.

Best Scientists Citing Jiří Čejka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles