World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
7007
World Ranking
8279
National Ranking
3550

Paul DiZio publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul DiZio sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 119 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul DiZio D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul DiZio sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul DiZio is a researcher affiliated with Brandeis University in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a pronounced focus on Cognitive Neuroscience. Additional subfields of interest include Physiology, Human-Computer Interaction, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, and Aerospace Engineering.

The main topics covered in Paul DiZio's research include:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders

Paul DiZio has contributed to a number of recent papers, with notable publications including:

  • "Velocity storage: its multiple roles," 2020, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "Characterizing Individual Differences in a Dynamic Stabilization Task Using Machine Learning," 2020, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance
  • "Multiple roles of active stiffness in upright balance and multidirectional sway," 2020, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "Crash Prediction Using Deep Learning in a Disorienting Spaceflight Analog Balancing Task," 2022, Frontiers in Physiology
  • "Virtual reality as a countermeasure for astronaut motion sickness during simulated post-flight water landings," 2023, Experimental Brain Research

Their collaborative network includes frequent coauthors such as James R. Lackner, Vivekanand Pandey Vimal, Avijit Bakshi, Taylor L. Lonner, and Aaron R. Allred.

Key publication venues for Paul DiZio show a concentration in:

  • Experimental Brain Research
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Frontiers in Physiology
  • Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance
  • npj Microgravity

Best Publications

  • Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory

    James R. Lackner;Paul Dizio

  • Vestibular, proprioceptive, and haptic contributions to spatial orientation.

    James R. Lackner;Paul DiZio

  • Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm

    P. Dizio;J. R. Lackner

  • Precision contact of the fingertip reduces postural sway of individuals with bilateral vestibular loss.

    James R. Lackner;Paul DiZio;John Jeka;Fay Horak

  • Human orientation and movement control in weightless and artificial gravity environments

    James R. Lackner;Paul DiZio

  • Space motion sickness

    James R. Lackner;Paul DiZio

  • Auditory cues for orientation and postural control in sighted and congenitally blind people.

    Randolph D. Easton;Anthony J. Greene;Paul DiZio;James R. Lackner

  • Aspects of body self-calibration

    James R. Lackner;Paul A. DiZio

  • Motor control and learning in altered dynamic environments

    James R Lackner;Paul DiZio

  • Stabilization of posture by precision touch of the index finger with rigid and flexible filaments.

    James R. Lackner;Ely Rabin;Paul DiZio

  • Gravitoinertial force level influences arm movement control

    J. Fisk;J. R. Lackner;P. DiZio

  • Gravitoinertial force level affects the appreciation of limb position during muscle vibration.

    James R. Lackner;Paul DiZio

  • Haptic stabilization of posture: changes in arm proprioception and cutaneous feedback for different arm orientations.

    Ely Rabin;Simone B. Bortolami;Paul DiZio;James R. Lackner

  • Circumventing side effects of immersive virtual environments

    Paul DiZio;James R. Lackner

  • Fingertip contact suppresses the destabilizing influence of leg muscle vibration.

    James R. Lackner;Ely Rabin;Paul DiZio

  • Coordinated turn-and-reach movements. I. Anticipatory compensation for self-generated coriolis and interaction torques.

    Pascale Pigeon;Simone B. Bortolami;Paul DiZio;James R. Lackner

  • Reaching During Virtual Rotation: Context Specific Compensations for Expected Coriolis Forces

    Joseph V. Cohn;Paul DiZio;James R. Lackner

  • Spatial orientation, adaptation, and motion sickness in real and virtual environments

    Paul DiZio;James R. Lackner

  • Analysis of human postural responses to recoverable falls.

    S. B. Bortolami;P. DiZio;E. Rabin;J. R. Lackner

  • Congenitally blind individuals rapidly adapt to coriolis force perturbations of their reaching movements.

    Paul DiZio;James R. Lackner

  • The effects of gravitoinertial force level and head movements on post-rotational nystagmus and illusory after-rotation.

    P. DiZio;J. R. Lackner

  • The influence of gravitoinertial force level on oculomotor and perceptual responses to Coriolis, cross-coupling stimulation

    Paul Dizio;James R. Lackner;John N. Evanoff

  • Perceived self-motion elicited by postrotary head tilts in a varying gravitoinertial force background

    Paul DiZio;James R. Lackner

  • The influence of gravitoinertial force level on oculomotor and perceptual responses to sudden stop stimulation.

    Paul Dizio;James R. Lackner;John N. Evanoff

  • Sensory-motor factors triggering the suppression of post-rotary vestibular responses in different gravitoinertial force backgrounds.

    P. DiZio;J. R. Lackner

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. Lackner
James R. Lackner Brandeis University
Alan M. Wing
Alan M. Wing University of Birmingham
T. Richard Nichols
T. Richard Nichols Georgia Institute of Technology
Brian L. Day
Brian L. Day University College London
Grigori N. Orlovsky
Grigori N. Orlovsky Karolinska Institute
J. Timothy Inglis
J. Timothy Inglis University of British Columbia
John J. Jeka
John J. Jeka University of Delaware
Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham
Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham Carnegie Mellon University
Tatiana G. Deliagina
Tatiana G. Deliagina Karolinska Institute
Fay B. Horak
Fay B. Horak Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often intersects with fields like social work, psychology, and counseling. Many students seek flexible and affordable ways to advance their education online. For those interested in a quick entry into the helping professions, a 1 year online master's in social work can prepare you for diverse clinical and community roles in a condensed timeline.

If you're considering psychology, there are programs tailored for efficiency as well. The fastest online psychology degree options allow students to graduate sooner and begin careers in mental health, research, or education.

For counseling, it's crucial to choose a reputable program. Seek out cacrep accredited programs online to ensure you meet licensing and professional standards. Affordability is another key consideration—research the masters in counseling online cost to find programs that fit your budget.

Allied degrees can expand your neuroscience foundation, offering new career pathways in research, therapy, and healthcare leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Paul DiZio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles