World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
4355
World Ranking
7864
National Ranking
2629

Erik E. Sotka publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik E. Sotka sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 111 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Erik E. Sotka D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik E. Sotka sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Erik E. Sotka is affiliated with the College of Charleston in the United States. Their research intersects several areas within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a primary focus on oceanographic and ecological processes.

The scientist's work is concentrated in the fields of Oceanography, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Genetics, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Their main topics of research include:

  • Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds

Frequent publication venues where Erik E. Sotka has contributed include:

  • Ecology
  • Journal of Phycology
  • Molecular Ecology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Biological Invasions

Erik E. Sotka has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, notably:

  • A. Randall Hughes
  • Torrance C. Hanley
  • Stacy A. Krueger-Hadfield
  • Allan E. Strand
  • Jonathan H. Grabowski

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Erik E. Sotka include:

  • What global biogeochemical consequences will marine animal-sediment interactions have during climate change?, 2021, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • Founder effects shape linkage disequilibrium and genomic diversity of a partially clonal invader, 2021, Molecular Ecology
  • A Pleistocene legacy structures variation in modern seagrass ecosystems, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Local Adaptation in Marine Foundation Species at Microgeographic Scales, 2021, Biological Bulletin
  • Intra-Meadow Variation in Seagrass Flowering Phenology Across Depths, 2020, Estuaries and Coasts

Best Publications

  • Global patterns in the impact of marine herbivores on benthic primary producers.

    Alistair G. B. Poore;Alexandra H. Campbell;Ross A. Coleman;Graham J. Edgar

  • Strong genetic clines and geographical variation in gene flow in the rocky intertidal barnacle Balanus glandula

    Erik E. Sotka;John P. Wares;John A. Barth;Richard K. Grosberg

  • Biodiversity mediates top–down control in eelgrass ecosystems: a global comparative‐experimental approach

    J Emmett Duffy;J Emmett Duffy;Pamela L Reynolds;Christoffer Boström;James A Coyer

  • Effects of Nutrients versus Herbivores on Reef Algae: A New Method for Manipulating Nutrients on Coral Reefs

    M. W. Miller;M. E. Hay;Steven Miller;D. Malone

  • Tissue-specific induction of herbivore resistance: seaweed response to amphipod grazing.

    Richard B. Taylor;Erik Sotka;Mark E. Hay

  • Local adaptation in host use among marine invertebrates

    Erik E. Sotka

  • Impacts of an abundant introduced ecosystem engineer within mudflats of the southeastern US coast

    James E. Byers;Paul E. Gribben;Caitlin Yeager;Erik E. Sotka

  • Invasion of novel habitats uncouples haplo‐diplontic life cycles

    Stacy A. Krueger-Hadfield;Nicole M. Kollars;James E. Byers;Thomas W. Greig

  • Geographic variation among herbivore populations in tolerance for a chemically rich seaweed

    Erik E. Sotka;Mark E. Hay

  • Persistence and Change in Community Composition of Reef Corals through Present, Past, and Future Climates

    Peter J. Edmunds;Mehdi Adjeroud;Marissa Leanne Baskett;Iliana B. Baums

  • Effects of herbivores, nutrient enrichment, and their interactions on macroalgal proliferation and coral growth

    E. E. Sotka;M. E. Hay

  • Phylogenetic and geographic variation in host breadth and composition by herbivorous amphipods in the family Ampithoidae.

    Alistair G. B. Poore;Nicole A. Hill;Erik E. Sotka

  • Engineering or food? mechanisms of facilitation by a habitat-forming invasive seaweed

    Jeffrey T. Wright;James E. Byers;Jayna L. DeVore;Erik E. Sotka

  • Latitude, temperature, and habitat complexity predict predation pressure in eelgrass beds across the Northern Hemisphere.

    Pamela L. Reynolds;Pamela L. Reynolds;John J. Stachowicz;Kevin Hovel;Christoffer Boström

  • The use of genetic clines to estimate dispersal distances of marine larvae.

    Erik E. Sotka;Stephen R. Palumbi

  • Genetic identification of source and likely vector of a widespread marine invader.

    Stacy A. Krueger‐Hadfield;Stacy A. Krueger‐Hadfield;Nicole M. Kollars;Allan E. Strand;James E. Byers

  • Geographic and genetic variation in feeding preference for chemically defended seaweeds.

    Erik E. Sotka;John P. Wares;Mark E. Hay

  • Combining niche shift and population genetic analyses predicts rapid phenotypic evolution during invasion.

    Erik E. Sotka;Aaron W. Baumgardner;Paige M. Bippus;Christophe Destombe

  • The emerging role of pharmacology in understanding consumer–prey interactions in marine and freshwater systems

    Erik E. Sotka;Jennifer Forbey;Michael Horn;Alistair G. B. Poore

  • Tissue-specific induction of resistance to herbivores in a brown seaweed: the importance of direct grazing versus waterborne signals from grazed neighbors

    Erik E Sotka;Richard B Taylor;Richard B Taylor;Mark E Hay

  • CHARACTERIZATION OF A DINOFLAGELLATE CRYPTOCHROME BLUE‐LIGHT RECEPTOR WITH A POSSIBLE ROLE IN CIRCADIAN CONTROL OF THE CELL CYCLE1

    Stephanie A. Brunelle;E. Starr Hazard;Erik E. Sotka;Frances M. Van Dolah

Frequent Co-Authors

James E. Byers
James E. Byers University of Georgia
Florian Weinberger
Florian Weinberger Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Mark E. Hay
Mark E. Hay Georgia Institute of Technology
J. Emmett Duffy
J. Emmett Duffy Smithsonian Institution
Alistair G. B. Poore
Alistair G. B. Poore University of New South Wales
Masahiro Nakaoka
Masahiro Nakaoka Hokkaido University
John J. Stachowicz
John J. Stachowicz University of California, Davis
Stephen R. Palumbi
Stephen R. Palumbi Stanford University
A. Randall Hughes
A. Randall Hughes Northeastern University
Lisa A. Levin
Lisa A. Levin University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse pathways in science, education, and conservation. However, as fields increasingly overlap, many students consider flexible online degree options to expand their qualifications or transition into complementary roles—such as environmental policy, education, or even healthcare administration.

For example, professionals with a background in science may explore msn direct entry programs online if they’re interested in merging environmental science with public health or nursing. Those considering leadership or teaching roles can benefit from comparing reputable online programs—useful resources include detailed comparisons, such as the one for wgu vs chamberlain.

Cost-effective pathways also matter for many students. Some seek rn to bsn to msn online programs for streamlined advancement. Regardless of your chosen specialty, attending one of the non profit colleges ensures your degree comes from an accredited, high-quality institution. Exploring these online options can help you align your career aspirations with the demands of today's evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Erik E. Sotka

Trending Scientists