World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 132 2330 2172 1315 1207 583 59201

V. R. Edgerton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by V. R. Edgerton between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. V. R. Edgerton published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2006. 4 of the 607 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2006. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 10 publications 1971: 4 publications 1972: 8 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 9 publications 1976: 7 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 10 publications 1982: 11 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 12 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 16 publications 1992: 17 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 23 publications 1997: 21 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 22 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 20 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 27 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1969 2025

607 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
V. R. Edgerton: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 10
1971 4
1972 8
1973 2
1974 3
1975 9
1976 7
1977 5
1978 3
1979 4
1980 6
1981 10
1982 11
1983 8
1984 8
1985 5
1986 9
1987 9
1988 10
1989 12
1990 15
1991 16
1992 17
1993 9
1994 7
1995 15
1996 23
1997 21
1998 10
1999 14
2000 22
2001 15
2002 20
2003 16
2004 9
2005 16
2006 27
2007 10
2008 16
2009 16
2010 8
2011 12
2012 15
2013 8
2014 6
2015 19
2016 11
2017 5
2018 11
2019 7
2020 10
2021 13
2022 10
2023 10
2024 1
2025 3
Total 607
Download as CSV

V. R. Edgerton publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where V. R. Edgerton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 583 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 583
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

V. R. Edgerton D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where V. R. Edgerton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 132–133 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 132 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168 132
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - J. Allyn Taylor International Prize in Medicine, Robarts Research Institute

Overview

V. R. Edgerton is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields including Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, and Rehabilitation.

The scientist's work covers multiple main topics, such as:

  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Edgerton has frequently published in several scientific journals, with the most notable venues including:

  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Experimental Neurology
  • Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Edgerton reflect an emphasis on neuromodulation and spinal cord research. These publications include:

  • "Cortical and Subcortical Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation in Humans with Tetraplegia," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Neuromodulator (TESCoN) Improves Symptoms of Overactive Bladder," 2020, Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
  • "Cervical Electrical Neuromodulation Effectively Enhances Hand Motor Output in Healthy Subjects by Engaging a Use-Dependent Intervention," 2021, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • "Reversing 21 years of chronic paralysis via non-invasive spinal cord neuromodulation: a case study," 2020, Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
  • "Novel Noninvasive Spinal Neuromodulation Strategy Facilitates Recovery of Stepping after Motor Complete Paraplegia," 2022, Journal of Clinical Medicine

Edgerton has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, including:

  • Parag Gad
  • Hui Zhong
  • Evgeniy Kreydin
  • Yury Gerasimenko
  • Aidin Abedi

Among the awards received, Edgerton was honored with the J. Allyn Taylor International Prize in Medicine by the Robarts Research Institute in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Metabolic profiles of three fiber types of skeletal muscle in guinea pigs and rabbits.

    J B Peter;R J Barnard;V R Edgerton;C A Gillespie

  • HINDLIMB MUSCLE FIBER POPULATIONS OF FIVE MAMMALS

    Ariano Ma;Armstrong Rb;Edgerton Vr

  • Neurobiology of exercise.

    Rod K. Dishman;Hans Rudolf Berthoud;Frank W. Booth;Carl W. Cotman

  • Muscle Architecture of the Human Lower Limb

    Thomas Wickiewicz;Roland Roy;Perry Powell;V. Edgerton

  • Voluntary Exercise Induces a BDNF-Mediated Mechanism That Promotes Neuroplasticity

    Fernando Gómez-Pinilla;Zhe Ying;Roland R. Roy;Raffaella Molteni

  • Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury.

    Gregoire Courtine;Bingbing Song;Roland R Roy;Hui Zhong

  • Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input.

    Grégoire Courtine;Yury Gerasimenko;Rubia van den Brand;Aileen Yew

  • PLASTICITY OF THE SPINAL NEURAL CIRCUITRY AFTER INJURY

    V. Reggie Edgerton;Niranjala J.K. Tillakaratne;Allison J. Bigbee;Ray D. de Leon

  • Effects of training on the recovery of full-weight-bearing stepping in the adult spinal cat.

    R.G. Lovely;R.J. Gregor;R.R. Roy;V.R. Edgerton

  • Predictability of skeletal muscle tension from architectural determinations in guinea pig hindlimbs.

    P. L. Powell;R. R. Roy;P. Kanim;M. A. Bello

  • Myonuclear domains in muscle adaptation and disease

    D L Allen;R R Roy;V R Edgerton

  • Histochemical, biochemical, and contractile properties of red, white, and intermediate fibers

    RJ Barnard;VR Edgerton;T Furukawa;JB Peter

  • Physiological cross-sectional area of human leg muscles based on magnetic resonance imaging

    T. Fukunaga;R. R. Roy;F. G. Shellock;F. G. Shellock;J. A. Hodgson

  • Muscle fibre type populations of human leg muscles.

    V R Edgerton;J L Smith;D R Simpson

  • Neuromodulation of lumbosacral spinal networks enables independent stepping after complete paraplegia

    Megan L. Gill;Peter J. Grahn;Jonathan S. Calvert;Margaux B. Linde

  • Locomotor capacity attributable to step training versus spontaneous recovery after spinalization in adult cats.

    R. D. de Leon;J. A. Hodgson;R. R. Roy;V. R. Edgerton

  • Rapid ankle extension during paw shakes: Selective recruitment of fast ankle extensors

    J. L. Smith;B. Betts;V. R. Edgerton;R. F. Zernicke

  • Specific tension of human plantar flexors and dorsiflexors

    T. Fukunaga;R. R. Roy;F. G. Shellock;J. A. Hodgson

  • Apoptosis: a mechanism contributing to remodeling of skeletal muscle in response to hindlimb unweighting

    David L. Allen;Jon K. Linderman;Roland R. Roy;A. J. Bigbee

  • Identification of myogenic-endothelial progenitor cells in the interstitial spaces of skeletal muscle.

    Tetsuro Tamaki;Akira Akatsuka;Kiyoshi Ando;Yoshihiko Nakamura

Frequent Co-Authors

Roland R. Roy
Roland R. Roy University of California, Los Angeles
Hui Zhong
Hui Zhong University of California, Los Angeles
Stephen A. Spector
Stephen A. Spector University of California, San Diego
Frank G. Shellock
Frank G. Shellock University of Southern California
Tetsuo Fukunaga
Tetsuo Fukunaga National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya
Thomas L. Wickiewicz
Thomas L. Wickiewicz Hospital for Special Surgery
Gary C. Sieck
Gary C. Sieck Mayo Clinic
David A. Washburn
David A. Washburn Georgia State University
Yury Gerasimenko
Yury Gerasimenko Pavlov Institute of Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Carl W. Cotman
Carl W. Cotman University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking alternative or complementary pathways, a range of online healthcare degrees can broaden your career options in the US. Many roles within healthcare—such as administration, nursing, advanced practice, and nutrition—are now accessible through flexible online programs designed for diverse backgrounds.

If you are passionate about health and wellness, a nutritionist online degree can prepare you for roles in dietetics, community education, or nutrition consulting. Students seeking leadership or non-clinical careers should consider cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs to qualify for management and executive positions in hospitals or healthcare organizations.

For registered nurses aiming to advance their studies, there are flexible rn to bsn online no clinicals options, eliminating the need for in-person clinical hours. Experienced nurses looking for the fastest route to leadership or specialist roles may find shortest dnp programs ideal for earning their Doctor of Nursing Practice in minimal time.

These online pathways give aspiring healthcare professionals the flexibility to balance studies with work and personal commitments—making it easier to launch or advance a rewarding career in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing V. R. Edgerton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles