World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 17265 16225 8651 7995 294 19964

Peter J. Savino publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter J. Savino between 1973 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter J. Savino published across 52 years, from 1973 to 2024, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 1983. 2 of the 297 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 1983. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 5 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 7 publications 1982: 8 publications 1983: 16 publications 1984: 9 publications 1985: 12 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 12 publications 1989: 15 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
1973 2024

297 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter J. Savino: publications per year, 1973 to 2024
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 2
1976 1
1977 5
1978 3
1979 5
1980 3
1981 7
1982 8
1983 16
1984 9
1985 12
1986 5
1987 8
1988 12
1989 15
1990 15
1991 10
1992 8
1993 10
1994 5
1995 12
1996 6
1997 1
1998 2
1999 0
2000 3
2001 7
2002 10
2003 14
2004 8
2005 11
2006 12
2007 7
2008 4
2009 7
2010 3
2011 2
2012 6
2013 3
2014 5
2015 1
2016 0
2017 1
2018 0
2019 5
2020 2
2021 2
2022 0
2023 0
2024 2
Total 297
Download as CSV

Peter J. Savino publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Savino sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 294 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768 294
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter J. Savino D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Savino sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter J. Savino is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their work primarily resides within the field of Medicine, with a focus on Ophthalmology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology, Neurology, and Biomedical Engineering as subfields.

The main topics covered by Savino's research include:

  • Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Meningioma and schwannoma management
  • Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
  • Head and Neck Surgical Oncology

Their recent publications reflect these areas of study and include the following papers:

  • "Prognostic Utility of Optical Coherence Tomography for Long-Term Visual Recovery Following Pituitary Tumor Surgery," 2020, American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • "Temporal patterns of visual recovery following pituitary tumor resection: A prospective cohort study," 2021, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
  • "Case report 68Ga-DOTATATE of optic nerve sheath meningioma," 2021, American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports
  • "Looking beyond blurred margins," 2024, Survey of Ophthalmology
  • "Unilateral papilledema: illustrative case," 2024, Journal of Neurosurgery Case Lessons

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Savino include:

  • Michael T.M. Wang
  • James King
  • R. C. Andrew Symons
  • Stanley S. Stylli
  • Mark Daniell

Savino's research has appeared repeatedly in a range of publication venues, such as:

  • American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports
  • Survey of Ophthalmology
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Case Lessons

Best Publications

  • A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis

    Roy W. Beck;Patricia A. Cleary;Malcolm M. Anderson;John L. Keltner

  • Visual Loss in Pseudotumor Cerebri: Follow-up of 57 Patients From Five to 41 Years and a Profile of 14 Patients With Permanent Severe Visual Loss

    J J Corbett;P J Savino;H S Thompson;T Kansu

  • Multiple sclerosis risk after optic neuritis: Final optic neuritis treatment trial follow-up

    Michael Brodsky;Michael Brodsky;Sarkis Nazarian;Silvia Orengo-Nania;George J. Hutton

  • High- and low-risk profiles for the development of multiple sclerosis within 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial.

    Beck Rw;Trobe Jd;Moke Ps;Gal Rl

  • Clinical Profile And Long-Term Implications of Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy

    Michael X. Repka;Peter J. Savino;Norman J. Schatz;Robert C. Sergott

  • Treatment of chiasmatic/hypothalamic gliomas of childhood with chemotherapy: an update.

    Roger J. Packer;Leslie N. Sutton;Leslie N. Sutton;Larissa T. Bilaniuk;Larissa T. Bilaniuk;Jerilynn Radcliffe;Jerilynn Radcliffe

  • Optic disc structure in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.

    Roy W. Beck;Peter J. Savino;Peter J. Savino;Michael X. Repka;Norman J. Schatz;Norman J. Schatz;Norman J. Schatz

  • Visual function more than 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial

    Roy W Beck;Robin L Gal;M Tariq Bhatti;Michael C Brodsky

  • Clinical Decisions in Neuro-Ophthalmology

    Ronald M. Burde;Peter J. Savino;Jonathan D. Trobe

  • Modified optic nerve sheath decompression provides long-term visual improvement for pseudotumor cerebri.

    Robert C. Sergott;Peter J. Savino;Thomas M. Bosley

  • In vivo retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography predicts visual recovery after surgery for parachiasmal tumors.

    Helen V Danesh-Meyer;Taras Papchenko;Peter J Savino;Andrew Law

  • Poor prognosis of visual outcome after visual loss from giant cell arteritis

    Helen Danesh-Meyer;Peter J. Savino;Greg G. Gamble

  • Prevalence of a normal C-reactive protein with an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis.

    Mona Parikh;Neil R. Miller;Andrew G. Lee;Peter J. Savino

  • Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of optic nerve sheath meningiomas: preliminary observations of 33 optic nerves in 30 patients with historical comparison to observation with or without prior surgery.

    David W. Andrews;Rod Faroozan;Benson P. Yang;Richard S. Hudes

  • Radiation Optic Neuropathy

    Gary C. Brown;Jerry A. Shields;George Sanborn;James J. Augsburger

  • Cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures in pseudotumor cerebri

    M. L. Rosenberg;J. J. Corbett;C. Smith;J. Goodwin

  • Hypopituitarism following radiation therapy of pituitary adenomas.

    Peter J. Snyder;Barbara F. Fowble;Norman J. Schatz;Peter J. Savino

  • MR imaging of Tolosa-Hunt syndrome.

    D M Yousem;S W Atlas;R I Grossman;R C Sergott

  • Alzheimer's Disease with Prominent Visual Symptoms: Clinical and Metabolic Evaluation

    Motohiro Kiyosawa;Motohiro Kiyosawa;Thomas M. Bosley;Thomas M. Bosley;John Chawluk;Dara Jamieson

  • Color Doppler Imaging of the Ocular Ischemic Syndrome

    Allen C. Ho;Wolfgang E. Lieb;Patrick M. Flaharty;Robert C. Sergott

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil R. Miller
Neil R. Miller Johns Hopkins University
Larissa T. Bilaniuk
Larissa T. Bilaniuk Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Robert A. Zimmerman
Robert A. Zimmerman Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Peter J. Snyder
Peter J. Snyder University of Pennsylvania
Robert I. Grossman
Robert I. Grossman New York University
Thomas A. Gennarelli
Thomas A. Gennarelli University of Pennsylvania
Roy W. Beck
Roy W. Beck University of South Florida
Roger J. Packer
Roger J. Packer Children’s National Health System
Andrew H. Kaye
Andrew H. Kaye University of Melbourne
Martin Reivich
Martin Reivich University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but looking for flexible or alternative study options? There are many online degree pathways to launch or advance your career in medicine and related fields. For those drawn to administrative roles, medical billing and coding online schools offer accredited programs with the possibility of financial aid, opening doors to vital support positions in healthcare.

If nursing is your chosen path, there are nursing school that don't require teas, simplifying admission while still preparing you to meet today’s patient care demands. Experienced nurses seeking advancement may consider bridging programs, such as asn to fnp, which accelerate the journey from Associate Degree in Nursing to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner.

For those aspiring to management, an online healthcare management degree provides a route to leadership positions in hospitals, clinics, and the broader medical industry. Each of these options can help you develop relevant skills while offering the convenience and flexibility that online learning provides.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Savino

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles