World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
26619
World Ranking
16044
National Ranking
8075

Neil R. Miller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil R. Miller sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 522 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Neil R. Miller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil R. Miller sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil R. Miller is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research falls predominantly within the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Neurology, Ophthalmology, Surgery, Plant Science, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's work often addresses multiple subfields, including:

  • Neurology
  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgery
  • Plant Science
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Their main research topics encompass:

  • Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
  • Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders

Neil R. Miller has collaborated frequently with several researchers, notably:

  • Andrew R. Carey
  • Zara Mehrabian
  • Steven L. Bernstein
  • Raymond P. Najjar
  • Zhiqun Tang

The scientist has published extensively in a variety of journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
  • Neuro-Ophthalmology
  • Neurology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS ONE

Recent publications include:

  • Accuracy of a Deep Learning System for Classification of Papilledema Severity on Ocular Fundus Photographs, 2021, Neurology
  • Persistent Globe Flattening in Astronauts following Long-Duration Spaceflight, 2020, Neuro-Ophthalmology
  • Investigating the diverse potential of a multi-purpose legume, Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet, for smallholder production in East Africa, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Detection of Optic Disc Abnormalities in Color Fundus Photographs Using Deep Learning, 2021, Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
  • Application of a Deep Learning System to Detect Papilledema on Nonmydriatic Ocular Fundus Photographs in an Emergency Department, 2023, American Journal of Ophthalmology

Best Publications

  • Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss.

    Alfred Sommer;Joanne Katz;Harry A. Quigley;Neil R. Miller

  • A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis

    Roy W. Beck;Patricia A. Cleary;Malcolm M. Anderson;John L. Keltner

  • Multiple sclerosis risk after optic neuritis: Final optic neuritis treatment trial follow-up

    Michael Brodsky;Michael Brodsky;Sarkis Nazarian;Silvia Orengo-Nania;George J. Hutton

  • The Nerve Fiber Layer in the Diagnosis of Glaucoma

    Alfred Sommer;Neil R. Miller;Irvin Pollack;A. Edward Maumenee

  • Clinical evaluation of nerve fiber layer atrophy as an indicator of glaucomatous optic nerve damage.

    Harry A. Quigley;Neil R. Miller;Terry George

  • High- and low-risk profiles for the development of multiple sclerosis within 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial.

    Beck Rw;Trobe Jd;Moke Ps;Gal Rl

  • Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics.

    James M. Tielsch;Joanne Katz;Harry A. Quigley;Neil R. Miller

  • Bilateral Duane's Retraction Syndrome: A Clinical-Pathologic Case Report

    Mary G. Hotchkiss;Neil R. Miller;Arthur W. Clark;William R. Green

  • Evaluation of Nerve Fiber Layer Assessment

    Alfred Sommer;Harry A. Quigley;Alan L. Robin;Neil R. Miller

  • Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy: Clinical Manifestations of the 3460 Mutation

    Donald R. Johns;Kyle H. Smith;Neil R. Miller

  • Vigabatrin-associated retinal cone system dysfunction Electroretinogram and ophthalmologic findings

    Gregory L. Krauss;Mary A. Johnson;Neil R. Miller

  • Cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement for pseudotumor cerebri-associated intractable headache: predictors of treatment response and an analysis of long-term outcomes.

    Matthew J. Mcgirt;Graeme Woodworth;George Thomas;Neil Miller

  • Unilateral Duane's Retraction Syndrome (Type 1)

    Neil R. Miller;Steven M. Kiel;William R. Green;Arthur W. Clark

  • Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics between the intracranial and the subarachnoid space of the optic nerve. Is it always bidirectional

    H. E. Killer;G. P. Jaggi;J. Flammer;N. R. Miller

  • Visual function more than 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial

    Roy W Beck;Robin L Gal;M Tariq Bhatti;Michael C Brodsky

  • Artificial Intelligence to Detect Papilledema from Ocular Fundus Photographs

    Dan Milea;Dan Milea;Raymond P. Najjar;Raymond P. Najjar;Jiang Zhubo;Daniel Ting;Daniel Ting

  • Lumboperitoneal shunt for the treatment of pseudotumor cerebri

    Eric R. Eggenberger;Neil R. Miller;Susan Vitale

  • Clinical spectrum of posterior ischemic optic neuropathy.

    Srinivas R. Sadda;Michelle Nee;Neil R. Miller;Valerie Biousse

  • Prevalence of a normal C-reactive protein with an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis.

    Mona Parikh;Neil R. Miller;Andrew G. Lee;Peter J. Savino

  • Current concepts in the diagnosis, pathogenesis and management of nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy

    N R Miller;A C Arnold

Frequent Co-Authors

W. Richard Green
W. Richard Green Johns Hopkins University
Harry A. Quigley
Harry A. Quigley Johns Hopkins University
Peter J. Savino
Peter J. Savino University of California, San Diego
Nancy J. Newman
Nancy J. Newman Emory University
Josef Flammer
Josef Flammer University of Basel
David S. Zee
David S. Zee Johns Hopkins University
Roy W. Beck
Roy W. Beck University of South Florida
Valérie Biousse
Valérie Biousse Emory University
Stuart L. Fine
Stuart L. Fine University of Colorado Denver
Randy H. Kardon
Randy H. Kardon University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career options related to Medicine in the USA opens up a range of pathways, many of which can be pursued through flexible online programs. For those interested in the organizational side of healthcare, an online healthcare administration degree can help you build vital management skills for roles in hospitals, clinics, and health systems.

Advancing further, the cheapest master's in healthcare administration programs offer affordable routes to leadership positions, combining business acumen with healthcare knowledge.

For registered nurses seeking to expand their clinical and leadership expertise, exploring the cheapest dnp (Doctor of Nursing Practice) options can pave the way to advanced practice, teaching, or executive roles.

Those passionate about the pharmaceutical field will find the best online pharmacy school programs provide the flexibility to earn a doctorate while balancing work or family commitments.

Each of these online programs supports different career ambitions, offering affordable pathways to leadership, clinical, or specialist roles across the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Neil R. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles