What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Surgery
- Radiology
Neil R. Miller mostly deals with Surgery, Optic nerve, Ophthalmology, Visual acuity and Radiology.
The study of Surgery is intertwined with the study of Giant cell arteritis in a number of ways.
His work deals with themes such as Eye disease and Pathology, which intersect with Optic nerve.
His Visual acuity study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Anesthesia, Sequela, Survival rate, Randomized controlled trial and Optic neuritis.
His Radiology research focuses on Lesion and how it connects with Prospective cohort study, Cohort study and Prednisone.
His research in Visual field intersects with topics in Electroretinography and Vigabatrin.
His most cited work include:
- Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. (945 citations)
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis (859 citations)
- The Nerve Fiber Layer in the Diagnosis of Glaucoma (382 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Neil R. Miller spends much of his time researching Surgery, Optic nerve, Ophthalmology, Pathology and Optic neuropathy.
The Surgery study which covers Radiology that intersects with Orbit.
The subject of his Optic nerve research is within the realm of Anatomy.
Glaucoma, Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, Optic disc and Nerve fiber layer are the primary areas of interest in his Ophthalmology study.
His Pathology study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as Retina.
His Visual acuity study frequently links to adjacent areas such as Visual field.
He most often published in these fields:
- Surgery (29.78%)
- Optic nerve (23.47%)
- Ophthalmology (19.33%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?
- Ophthalmology (19.33%)
- Optic nerve (23.47%)
- Surgery (29.78%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Ophthalmology, Optic nerve, Surgery, Pathology and Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.
His study looks at the relationship between Ophthalmology and topics such as Magnetic resonance imaging, which overlap with Cerebral angiography and Hydrocephalus.
Optic nerve is a primary field of his research addressed under Anatomy.
Neil R. Miller interconnects Odds ratio, Lumbar puncture and Risk factor in the investigation of issues within Surgery.
His Pathology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Tumor necrosis factor alpha, Rodent model, Neuroradiology and Inflammation.
In his work, Neurology is strongly intertwined with Visual acuity, which is a subfield of Optic neuropathy.
Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Current concepts in the diagnosis, pathogenesis and management of nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (91 citations)
- Cerebrospinal fluid exchange in the optic nerve in normal-tension glaucoma (83 citations)
- Visual and neurological outcomes following endovascular stenting for pseudotumor cerebri associated with transverse sinus stenosis. (82 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Surgery
- Radiology
His main research concerns Optic nerve, Surgery, Ophthalmology, Optic neuropathy and Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.
His Optic nerve study incorporates themes from Cerebrospinal fluid, Anesthesia and Visual acuity.
Neil R. Miller combines Surgery and In patient in his research.
His research investigates the connection between Ophthalmology and topics such as Magnetic resonance imaging that intersect with problems in Headaches, Stenosis, Venography, Hydrocephalus and Pseudotumor cerebri.
The concepts of his Optic neuropathy study are interwoven with issues in After treatment and Functional status.
His study in Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Cataract surgery, Etiology and Population study.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
