World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
43657
World Ranking
7009
National Ranking
3683

W. Richard Green publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Richard Green sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 554 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

W. Richard Green D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Richard Green sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - AAI Distinguished Service Award, American Association of Immunologists For outstanding service to AAI as member and Chair of the AAI Committee on Public Affairs, 2004-2009

Overview

W. Richard Green was affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their professional career included contributions recognized by the American Association of Immunologists (AAI), which awarded them the AAI Distinguished Service Award in 2012. The citation highlighted their outstanding service to AAI as a member and Chair of the AAI Committee on Public Affairs from 2004 to 2009.

Details regarding their research publications, including recent papers, book publications, and frequent publication venues, are not available. Likewise, information on frequent co-authors and specific fields or subfields of study connected to their work has not been provided.

The absence of data about main topics of work, specific research domains, and citation counts makes it difficult to outline the exact research focus areas of W. Richard Green. However, their recognition by the AAI suggests involvement in immunology-related service and possibly research.

W. Richard Green is deceased. The record of their contributions remains within academic and professional organizations related to their field.

Best Publications

  • Optic Nerve Damage in Human Glaucoma: III. Quantitative Correlation of Nerve Fiber Loss and Visual Field Defect in Glaucoma, Ischemic Neuropathy, Papilledema, and Toxic Neuropathy

    H A Quigley;E M Addicks;W R Green

  • Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma.

    Harry A. Quigley;Gregory R. Dunkelberger;W. Richard Green

  • Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. II. The site of injury and susceptibility to damage.

    Harry A. Quigley;Earl M. Addicks;W. Richard Green;A. E. Maumenee

  • Age-related macular degeneration histopathologic studies. The 1992 Lorenz E. Zimmerman Lecture.

    W. Richard Green;Cheryl Enger

  • Morphologic Changes in the Lamina Cribrosa Correlated with Neural Loss in Open-Angle Glaucoma

    Harry A. Quigley;Rebecca M. Hohman;Earl M. Addicks;Robert W. Massof

  • Corneal avascularity is due to soluble VEGF receptor-1

    Balamurali K. Ambati;Miho Nozaki;Nirbhai Singh;Atsunobu Takeda

  • Chronic Human Glaucoma Causing Selectively Greater Loss of Large Optic Nerve Fibers

    Harry A. Quigley;Gregory R. Dunkelberger;W. Richard Green

  • Epiretinal and Vitreous Membranes: Comparative Study of 56 Cases

    Anselm Kampik;Kenneth R. Kenyon;Ronald G. Michels;W Richard Green

  • Pathologic Features of Senile Macular Degeneratlon

    W. Richard Green;Peter J. McDonnell;Julia H. Yeo

  • Ocular and orbital involvement in leukemia

    Marilyn C. Kincaid;W.Richard Green

  • The Histology of Human Glaucoma Cupping and Optic Nerve Damage: Clinicopathologic Correlation in 21 Eyes

    Harry A. Quigley;W. Richard Green

  • Conjunctival Lesions in Adults: A Clinical and Histopathologic Review

    Hans Grossniklaus;W. Green;Martha Luckenbach;Chi Chan

  • Posterior Capsule Opacification in Pseudophakic Eyes

    Peter J. McDonnell;Marco A. Zarbin;W. Richard Green

  • Birdshot retinochoroidopathy associated with HLA-A29 antigen and immune responsiveness to retinal S-antigen.

    Robert B. Nussenblatt;Kamal K. Mittal;Stephen Ryan;W. Richard Green

  • Ocular Manifestations of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

    Douglas A. Jabs;W. Richard Green;Robin Fox;B. Frank Polk

  • Idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Ultrastructural characteristics and clinicopathologic correlation.

    William E. Smiddy;Albert M. Maguire;W. Richard Green;Ronald G. Michels

  • Sebaceous gland carcinoma. Review of 40 cases

    Marcos T. Doxanas;W. Richard Green

  • A histopathologic review of 168 cases of preretinal membrane.

    John G. Clarkson;W. Richard Green;Darcy Massof

  • Bilateral Duane's Retraction Syndrome: A Clinical-Pathologic Case Report

    Mary G. Hotchkiss;Neil R. Miller;Arthur W. Clark;William R. Green

  • Central retinal vein occlusion: a prospective histopathologic study of 29 eyes in 28 cases.

    W Richard Green;Chi Chao Chan;Grover M Hutchins;Joseph M Terry

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth R. Kenyon
Kenneth R. Kenyon Tufts University
Neil R. Miller
Neil R. Miller Johns Hopkins University
Irene H. Maumenee
Irene H. Maumenee University of Illinois at Chicago
Hans E. Grossniklaus
Hans E. Grossniklaus Emory University
William E. Smiddy
William E. Smiddy University of Miami
Stuart L. Fine
Stuart L. Fine University of Colorado Denver
Harry A. Quigley
Harry A. Quigley Johns Hopkins University
Douglas A. Jabs
Douglas A. Jabs Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Albert M. Maguire
Albert M. Maguire University of Pennsylvania
Chi-Chao Chan
Chi-Chao Chan National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career pathway in the USA doesn’t always mean pursuing a traditional M.D. degree. Many students are turning to alternative health programs and allied health professions that can be started online and may have more flexible admissions requirements.

For those who hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree and want to switch to nursing, online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors offer a fast-track option. If you’re concerned about admissions competitiveness, discover what’s the easiest nursing program to get into?—many programs have varying prerequisites and acceptance rates.

Not interested in clinical care? The healthcare industry also relies on professionals skilled in administration and records. Some of the best online medical billing and coding schools accept students year-round and offer financial aid, providing a solid career outlook with flexible study options.

If you wish to avoid lengthy standardized tests like the TEAS or HESI, look into programs that address the question: do i need to take the teas test for lpn and others. There are schools that waive such requirements, making entry into healthcare professions more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing W. Richard Green

Recently Published Articles