World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
26914
World Ranking
16534
National Ranking
861

Anselm Kampik publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anselm Kampik sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 744 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Anselm Kampik D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anselm Kampik sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anselm Kampik is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research focuses primarily on ophthalmology, with work spanning related subfields such as radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, as well as public health, environmental, and occupational health.

Kampik's scholarly contributions include a range of papers, with notable recent publications such as:

  • How to treat diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema most efficiently, 2022, Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Editorial Board, 2021, American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Editorial Board, 2021, American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Editorial Board, 2022, American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Editorial Board, 2022, American Journal of Ophthalmology

The publication venues where Kampik has frequently contributed include:

  • American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Die Ophthalmologie
  • Ġylym men densaulyķ saķtau.

Frequent coauthors in Kampik's research network are:

  • Anne L. Coleman
  • Janet Davis Miami
  • Eve J. Higginbotham
  • S Philadelphia
  • Gary N. Holland

The main topics covered by Kampik's research encompass:

  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Neurological and metabolic disorders
  • Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control

Kampik's work addresses multiple facets of eye health and disease, particularly in the areas of retinal conditions and ocular surgery. The integration of imaging techniques and systemic disease aspects reflects an interdisciplinary approach within their research.

Best Publications

  • Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales

    Charles P. Wilkinson;Frederick L. Ferris;Ronald Klein;Paul P. Lee

  • Enzymatic Vitreolysis with Ocriplasmin for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Holes

    Peter Stalmans;Matthew S Benz;Arnd Gandorfer;Anselm Kampik

  • Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema.

    Christos Haritoglou;Daniel Kook;Aljoscha Neubauer;Armin Wolf

  • Epiretinal and Vitreous Membranes: Comparative Study of 56 Cases

    Anselm Kampik;Kenneth R. Kenyon;Ronald G. Michels;W Richard Green

  • Resolution of diabetic macular edema after surgical removal of the posterior hyaloid and the inner limiting membrane.

    Arnd Gandorfer;Elisabeth M. Messmer;Michael W. Ulbig;Anselm Kampik

  • Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery

    S Ullrich;C Haritoglou;C Gass;M Schaumberger

  • Indocyanine green-assisted peeling of the internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery affects visual outcome: a clinicopathologic correlation.

    Christos Haritoglou;Arnd Gandorfer;Carolin A Gass;Markus Schaumberger

  • Indocyanine green-assisted peeling of the internal limiting membrane may cause retinal damage

    Arnd Gandorfer;Christos Haritoglou;Carolin A Gass;Michael W Ulbig

  • Retinal damage from indocyanine green in experimental macular surgery.

    Arnd Gandorfer;Christos Haritoglou;Achim Gandorfer;Anselm Kampik

  • Macular changes after peeling of the internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery.

    Christos Haritoglou;Carolin A Gass;Markus Schaumberger;Oliver Ehrt

  • Long-term follow-up after macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling

    Christos Haritoglou;Carolin A Gass;Markus Schaumberger;Arnd Gandorfer

  • Posterior vitreous detachment induced by microplasmin.

    Arnd Gandorfer;Matthias Rohleder;Matthias Rohleder;Charanjit Sethi;Dominik Eckle

  • Indocyanine green selectively stains the internal limiting membrane.

    Arnd Gandorfer;Elisabeth M. Messmer;Michael W. Ulbig;Anselm Kampik

  • Multi-MHz retinal OCT

    Thomas Klein;Wolfgang Wieser;Lukas Reznicek;Aljoscha Neubauer

  • Intravitreal silicone oil injection: complications and treatment of 415 consecutive patients

    Klaus Günther Riedel;Veit-Peter Gabel;Lorenz Neubauer;Anselm Kampik

  • The effect of indocyanine-green on functional outcome of macular pucker surgery

    Christos Haritoglou;Arnd Gandorfer;Carolin A Gass;Markus Schaumberger

  • Epiretinal pathology of vitreomacular traction syndrome.

    A Gandorfer;M Rohleder;A Kampik

  • Ultrastructural features of progressive idiopathic epiretinal membrane removed by vitreous surgery.

    P. Kenneth Nase;Anselm Kampik;W. Richard Green;Ronald G. Michels

  • The protective effect of quercetin against oxidative stress in the human RPE in vitro.

    Daniel Kook;Armin H. Wolf;Alice L. Yu;Aljoscha S. Neubauer

  • Endophthalmitis: Pathogenesis, clinical presentation, management, and perspectives.

    Marcus Kernt;Anselm Kampik

Frequent Co-Authors

William R. Freeman
William R. Freeman University of California, San Diego
Kenneth R. Kenyon
Kenneth R. Kenyon Tufts University
Michael Müller
Michael Müller Forschungszentrum Jülich
Hans Bloemendal
Hans Bloemendal Radboud University
W. Richard Green
W. Richard Green Johns Hopkins University
Thomas Meitinger
Thomas Meitinger Technical University of Munich
Anja-Katrin Bosserhoff
Anja-Katrin Bosserhoff University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
marius ueffing
marius ueffing University of Tübingen
Martin Dichgans
Martin Dichgans Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Steven K. Fisher
Steven K. Fisher University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in health professions beyond traditional medical school, online degree programs offer flexible and affordable options. Many aspiring nurses begin their journey by researching the what is the easiest nursing school to get into, while others look for more advanced or accelerated pathways.

Registered nurses seeking to advance their careers may consider the most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs. These programs allow working professionals to earn a bachelor’s degree on their own schedule. For those considering leadership or specialized clinical roles, there are also cheapest dnp programs online designed to minimize cost while maximizing career impact.

Non-nursing graduates interested in a fast track to nursing can explore online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses. These options let career changers enter the nursing field efficiently. With so many options, researching the program that fits your goals, schedule, and budget is essential to building a rewarding healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Anselm Kampik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles