World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Wiedemann

Peter Wiedemann

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
21374
World Ranking
18775
National Ranking
989

Peter Wiedemann publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Wiedemann sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 479 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Wiedemann D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Wiedemann sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Global Causes of Blindness and Distance Vision Impairment 1990-2020: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Seth R Flaxman;Rupert R A Bourne;Serge Resnikoff;Serge Resnikoff;Peter Ackland

  • Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Rupert R A Bourne;Seth R Flaxman;Tasanee Braithwaite;Maria V Cicinelli

  • Cellular signaling and factors involved in Müller cell gliosis: neuroprotective and detrimental effects.

    Andreas Bringmann;Ianors Iandiev;Thomas Pannicke;Antje Wurm

  • Efficacy and safety of monthly versus quarterly ranibizumab treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the EXCITE study.

    Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth;Bora Eldem;Robyn Guymer;Jean-François Korobelnik

  • The LIFE-Adult-Study: objectives and design of a population-based cohort study with 10,000 deeply phenotyped adults in Germany

    Markus Loeffler;Christoph Engel;Peter Ahnert;Dorothee Alfermann

  • Pathomechanisms of cystoid macular edema.

    Andreas Bringmann;Andreas Reichenbach;Peter Wiedemann

  • Role of retinal glial cells in neurotransmitter uptake and metabolism

    Andreas Bringmann;Thomas Pannicke;Bernd Biedermann;Mike Francke

  • The primate fovea: Structure, function and development.

    Andreas Bringmann;Steffen Syrbe;Katja Görner;Johannes Kacza

  • A potassium channel-linked mechanism of glial cell swelling in the postischemic retina.

    Thomas Pannicke;Ianors Iandiev;Ortrud Uckermann;Bernd Biedermann

  • Drug delivery systems for vitreoretinal diseases

    Tsutomu Yasukawa;Yuichiro Ogura;Yasuhiko Tabata;Hideya Kimura

  • Diabetes Alters Osmotic Swelling Characteristics and Membrane Conductance of Glial Cells in Rat Retina

    Thomas Pannicke;Ianors Iandiev;Antje Wurm;Ortrud Uckermann

  • Estimated number of ophthalmologists worldwide (International Council of Ophthalmology update): will we meet the needs?

    Serge Resnikoff;Van Charles Lansingh;Lindsey Washburn;William Felch

  • P2X7 receptors in Müller glial cells from the human retina.

    Thomas Pannicke;Wolfgang Fischer;Bernd Biedermann;Hiltrud Schädlich

  • Adjunctive daunorubicin in the treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy: results of a multicenter clinical trial

    P Wiedemann;R.D Hilgers;P Bauer;K Heimann

  • Positive Feedback Regulation between MMP-9 and VEGF in Human RPE Cells

    Margrit Hollborn;Christina Stathopoulos;Anja Steffen;Peter Wiedemann

  • Reactive glial cells: increased stiffness correlates with increased intermediate filament expression.

    Yun-Bi Lu;Ianors Iandiev;Margrit Hollborn;Nicole Körber

  • Treatment patterns, visual acuity and quality-of-life outcomes of the WAVE study - a noninterventional study of ranibizumab treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Germany.

    Robert P. Finger;Peter Wiedemann;Francisca Blumhagen;Karin Pohl

  • Silicone oil-RMN3 mixture ("heavy silicone oil") as internal tamponade for complicated retinal detachment

    Sebastian Wolf;Verena Schön;Ptetra Meier;Peter Wiedemann

  • Peeling of the basal membrane in the human retina: ultrastructural effects.

    Sebastian Wolf;Ute Schnurbusch;Peter Wiedemann;Jens Grosche

  • Role of PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK in Mediating Hypoxia-Induced Expression of HIF-1α and VEGF in Laser-Induced Rat Choroidal Neovascularization

    Xiu-Mei Yang;Yu-Sheng Wang;Jian Zhang;Yan Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Bringmann
Andreas Bringmann Leipzig University
Andreas Reichenbach
Andreas Reichenbach Leipzig University
Thomas Pannicke
Thomas Pannicke Leipzig University
Sebastian Wolf
Sebastian Wolf Heidelberg University
Michael Weller
Michael Weller University of Zurich
Frank G. Holz
Frank G. Holz University of Bonn
Stephen J. Ryan
Stephen J. Ryan University of Southern California
Hartwig Wolburg
Hartwig Wolburg University of Tübingen
Jens Grosche
Jens Grosche Leipzig University
Hugh R. Taylor
Hugh R. Taylor University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online programs is a smart option for those interested in healthcare careers, especially if you need flexibility due to work or personal commitments. Many roles in healthcare don’t require years of medical school, but still offer stable job prospects and growth. For example, taking billing and coding classes online can lead to quick entry into the medical field, supporting hospitals and clinics from an administrative angle.

Several universities now offer nursing degree online options, perfect for those who want to become registered nurses without attending classes in person. For advanced practice, consider the cheapest fnp programs online to become a family nurse practitioner — a high-demand role that delivers direct patient care.

For those already in nursing, further advancement is possible through online phd nursing programs, opening doors to leadership, teaching, and research positions. Whether you’re starting out or looking to specialize further, online pathways provide affordable, accessible opportunities in medicine and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Wiedemann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles