World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 81 16770 8412 570 21206

Frederick A. Jakobiec publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frederick A. Jakobiec between 1973 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frederick A. Jakobiec published across 50 years, from 1973 to 2022, averaging 11.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2016. 12 of the 573 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2016. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 7 publications 1975: 8 publications 1976: 5 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 15 publications 1979: 18 publications 1980: 12 publications 1981: 23 publications 1982: 20 publications 1983: 20 publications 1984: 12 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 14 publications 1987: 20 publications 1988: 11 publications 1989: 12 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 25 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 3 publications
1973 2022

573 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frederick A. Jakobiec: publications per year, 1973 to 2022
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 7
1975 8
1976 5
1977 5
1978 15
1979 18
1980 12
1981 23
1982 20
1983 20
1984 12
1985 9
1986 14
1987 20
1988 11
1989 12
1990 5
1991 7
1992 6
1993 3
1994 8
1995 2
1996 10
1997 8
1998 5
1999 9
2000 0
2001 2
2002 3
2003 2
2004 0
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 12
2009 15
2010 25
2011 20
2012 17
2013 25
2014 26
2015 24
2016 37
2017 31
2018 16
2019 14
2020 16
2021 9
2022 3
Total 573
Download as CSV

Frederick A. Jakobiec publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick A. Jakobiec sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 570 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 570
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Frederick A. Jakobiec D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick A. Jakobiec sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 81
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Frederick A. Jakobiec was affiliated with the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary in the United States. Their research activity focused primarily within the field of medicine, with a significant concentration in ophthalmology, surgery, oncology, dermatology, and epidemiology. The scientist's work addressed several specialized areas, including cancer and skin lesions, salivary gland tumors diagnosis and treatment, nasolacrimal duct obstruction treatments, ocular oncology and treatments, nonmelanoma skin cancer studies, ear and head tumors, and head and neck surgical oncology.

Throughout their career, Jakobiec contributed numerous publications in reputable venues. The most frequent publication outlets included:

  • Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (8 publications)
  • Ocular Oncology and Pathology (5 publications)
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology (4 publications)

The scientist collaborated regularly with several coauthors, with Paula Cortes Barrantes appearing most frequently alongside them in 7 papers. Other common collaborators were Natalie Wolkow (4 papers), Ralph C. Eagle (3 papers), Tatyana Milman (3 papers), and Anna M. Stagner (3 papers).

Among the recent papers published by Jakobiec, key works include:

  • "Subretinal Mononuclear Cells in Coats' Disease Studied with RPE65 and CD163: Evidence for Histiocytoid Pigment Epithelial Cells," 2020, American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • "PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression Levels Are Low in Primary and Secondary Adenoid Cystic Carcinomas of the Orbit: Therapeutic Implications," 2020, Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
  • "High Expression of Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Programmed Death Ligand 2 in Ophthalmic Sebaceous Carcinoma: The Case for a Clinical Trial of Checkpoint Inhibitors," 2020, American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • "Orbital Involvement by Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma With a Literature Review," 2020, Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
  • "Lacrimal Gland Hamartoma (Formerly Termed Dacryoadenoma)," 2020, American Journal of Ophthalmology

Best Publications

  • INTRAVITREOUS INJECTIONS OF VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR PRODUCE RETINAL ISCHEMIA AND MICROANGIOPATHY IN AN ADULT PRIMATE

    Michael J. Tolentino;Michael J. Tolentino;Joan W. Miller;Evangelos S. Gragoudas;Frederick A. Jakobiec

  • Lymphoid hyperplasia and malignant lymphoma occurring in the ocular adnexa (orbit, conjunctiva, and eyelids): A prospective multiparametric analysis of 108 cases during 1977 to 1987

    Daniel M. Knowles;Daniel M. Knowles;Frederick A. Jakobiec;Frederick A. Jakobiec;Lois Mcnally;Lois Mcnally;Jerome S. Burke;Jerome S. Burke

  • Correlation of CT Scanning and Pathologic Features of Ophthalmic Graves' Disease

    Stephen L. Trokel;Stephen L. Trokel;Frederick A. Jakobiec

  • Acanthamoeba keratitis. A review of the literature.

    Auran Jd;Starr Mb;Jakobiec Fa

  • Cavernous hemangioma of the orbit.

    Gerald J. Harris;Frederick A. Jakobiec

  • Immunohistochemical and Ultrastructural Studies on the Exenterated Orbital Tissues of a Patient with Graves' Disease

    Thierry J. Hufnagel;William F. Hickey;Walter H. Cobbs;Frederick A. Jakobiec

  • Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Premalignant and Malignant Melanocytic Lesions of the Conjunctiva

    Frederick A. Jakobiec;Frederick A. Jakobiec;Robert Folberg;Takeo Iwamoto

  • Intraocular-central nervous system lymphoma: Clinical features, diagnosis, and outcomes

    Esen Karamursel Akpek;Irma Ahmed;Frederick H Hochberg;Masoud Soheilian

  • Capillary Hemangioma of the Lids and Orbit: An Analysis of The Clinical Features and Therapeutic Results in 101 Cases

    Barrett G. Haik;Frederick A. Jakobiec;Robert M. Ellsworth;Ira S. Jones

  • Are Most Iris 'Melanomas' Really Nevi?: A Clinicopathologic Study of 189 Lesions

    Frederick A. Jakobiec;Glenn Silbert

  • Benign conjunctival melanocytic lesions. Clinicopathologic features.

    Robert Folberg;Frederick A. Jakobiec;Vitaliano B. Bernardino;Takeo Iwamoto

  • Orbital lymphoid neoplasms: a clinicopathologic study of 60 patients.

    Daniel M. Knowles;Frederick A. Jakobiec

  • Intravitreal Longevity of Three Perfluorocarbon Gases

    Harvey Lincoff;Jonathan Mardirossian;Andrew Lincoff;Peter Liggett

  • Cryotherapy for Conjunctival Primary Acquired Melanosis and Malignant Melanoma: Experience with 62 Cases

    Frederick A. Jakobiec;Frederick A. Jakobiec;Frank J. Rini;Frederick T. Fraunfelder;Seymour Brownstein

  • Elastodysplasia and Elastodystrophy as the Pathologic Bases of Ocular Pterygia and Pinguecula

    Paul Austin;Frederick A. Jakobiec;Takeo Iwamoto

  • IgG4-Related Systemic Disease as a Cause of “Idiopathic” Orbital Inflammation, Including Orbital Myositis, and Trigeminal Nerve Involvement

    Zachary S. Wallace;Arezou Khosroshahi;Arezou Khosroshahi;Frederick A. Jakobiec;Frederick A. Jakobiec;Vikram Deshpande

  • Retinoblastoma and intracranial malignancy.

    Frederick Albert F.A. Jakobiec;Mark O M M.O.M. Tso;Mark O M M.O.M. Tso;Lorenz L.E. Zimmerman;Pierre Danis

  • Idiopathic Inflammatory Orbital Pseudotumor in Childhood: I. Clinical Characteristics

    Linda S. Mottow;Frederick A. Jakobiec

  • Idiopathic Inflammatory Orbital Pseudotumor in Childhood: II. Results of Diagnostic Tests and Biopsies

    Linda Mottow-Lippa;Frederick A. Jakobiec;Mary Smith

  • Intravitreous Injections of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Produce Retinal Ischemia and Microangiopathy in an Adult Primate.

    M J Tolentino;J W Miller;E S Gragoudas;F A Jakobiec

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel M. Knowles
Daniel M. Knowles Cornell University
Lorenz E. Zimmerman
Lorenz E. Zimmerman United States Department of Defense
Evangelos S. Gragoudas
Evangelos S. Gragoudas Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
C. Stephen Foster
C. Stephen Foster Harvard University
Hans E. Grossniklaus
Hans E. Grossniklaus Emory University
Eliot L. Berson
Eliot L. Berson Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Claes H. Dohlman
Claes H. Dohlman Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Thaddeus P. Dryja
Thaddeus P. Dryja Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Stefan M. Pfister
Stefan M. Pfister German Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of alternative and complementary career pathways. For those looking to advance quickly, healthcare administration accelerated degree programs online allow students to earn credentials faster, making it easier to move into administrative roles in hospitals, clinics, and healthcare organizations.

Nurses seeking to elevate their career can consider asn to fnp programs, which offer seamless bridge options for registered nurses to become Family Nurse Practitioners through flexible online study.

For those drawn to nutrition and wellness, nutrition degrees online provide a pathway to careers in dietetics, food science, community health, and beyond.

Aspiring healthcare leaders may also benefit from pursuing cahme accredited online mha programs, which ensure a high standard of education for future healthcare administrators. Overall, these online programs offer flexibility and specialization, making them valuable options for building a rewarding healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick A. Jakobiec

Recently Published Articles