World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hans E. Grossniklaus

Hans E. Grossniklaus

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14527 13680 7348 6802 858 28825

Hans E. Grossniklaus publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hans E. Grossniklaus between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hans E. Grossniklaus published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 23.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 60 publications in 2002. 32 of the 946 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 60. Peak 60 publications in 2002. 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 20 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 60 publications 2003: 35 publications 2004: 30 publications 2005: 30 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 36 publications 2011: 41 publications 2012: 33 publications 2013: 60 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 38 publications 2016: 35 publications 2017: 40 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 36 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 38 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 6 publications
1985 2025

946 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hans E. Grossniklaus: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 3
1986 4
1987 6
1988 9
1989 0
1990 12
1991 9
1992 12
1993 8
1994 11
1995 11
1996 20
1997 18
1998 20
1999 17
2000 15
2001 16
2002 60
2003 35
2004 30
2005 30
2006 17
2007 23
2008 27
2009 23
2010 36
2011 41
2012 33
2013 60
2014 28
2015 38
2016 35
2017 40
2018 23
2019 36
2020 24
2021 35
2022 11
2023 38
2024 26
2025 6
Total 946
Download as CSV

Hans E. Grossniklaus publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans E. Grossniklaus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 841–860 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 858 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177 858
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Hans E. Grossniklaus D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans E. Grossniklaus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Hans E. Grossniklaus is affiliated with Emory University in the United States and is active in fields related to medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research focuses primarily on ophthalmology and oncology, with significant contributions in molecular biology, radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, as well as pathology and forensic medicine.

The scientist's work centers around several main topics, including ocular oncology and treatments, retinal development and disorders, glaucoma and retinal disorders, cutaneous melanoma detection and management, cancer-related molecular pathways, CNS lymphoma diagnosis and treatment, and retinal diseases and treatments.

Recent publications by Hans E. Grossniklaus include key papers such as:

  • Uveal melanoma, 2020, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Estimation of the timing of BAP1 mutation in uveal melanoma progression, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Drug-Free, Nonsurgical Reduction of Intraocular Pressure for Four Months after Suprachoroidal Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel, 2020, Advanced Science
  • Clinical outcomes following intravitreal methotrexate for primary vitreoretinal lymphoma, 2021, International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
  • Defining High-risk Retinoblastoma, 2021, JAMA Ophthalmology

Hans E. Grossniklaus frequently collaborates with several co-authors, notably:

  • Jill R. Wells
  • Curtis E. Margo
  • Carol L. Shields
  • G. Baker Hubbard
  • Ogul E. Uner

The scientist publishes regularly in several important journals and venues, including:

  • Ocular Oncology and Pathology
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Scientific Reports
  • International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology

Best Publications

  • DICER1 deficit induces Alu RNA toxicity in age-related macular degeneration

    Hiroki Kaneko;Sami Dridi;Valeria Tarallo;Bradley D. Gelfand

  • Pathologic findings in pathologic myopia.

    Grossniklaus He;Green Wr

  • Macrophage and retinal pigment epithelium expression of angiogenic cytokines in choroidal neovascularization.

    Hans E. Grossniklaus;Jun X. Ling;Timothy M. Wallace;Stefan Dithmar;Stefan Dithmar

  • Conjunctival Lesions in Adults: A Clinical and Histopathologic Review

    Hans Grossniklaus;W. Green;Martha Luckenbach;Chi Chan

  • Animal models of choroidal and retinal neovascularization.

    Hans E. Grossniklaus;Shin J. Kang;Lennart Berglin

  • Depth-dependent Cohesive Tensile Strength in Human Donor Corneas: Implications for Refractive Surgery

    J Bradley Randleman;Daniel G Dawson;Hans E Grossniklaus;Bernard E McCarey

  • Histologic and morphometric analysis of the choroid, Bruch's membrane, and retinal pigment epithelium in postmortem eyes with age-related macular degeneration and histologic examination of surgically excised choroidal neovascular membranes

    Christoph W Spraul;Gabriele E Lang;Hans E Grossniklaus;Gerhard K Lang

  • Age-related retinopathy in NRF2-deficient mice

    Zhenyang Zhao;Yan Chen;Jian Wang;Paul Sternberg

  • Indocyanine green effect on cultured human retinal pigment epithelial cells: implication for macular hole surgery.

    Brian D Sippy;Nicholas E Engelbrecht;George Baker Hubbard;Siobhan E Moriarty

  • Ophthalmic Drug Delivery Systems for the Treatment of Retinal Diseases: Basic Research to Clinical Applications

    Henry F. Edelhauser;Cheryl L. Rowe-Rendleman;Michael R. Robinson;Daniel G. Dawson

  • Collaborative ocular melanoma study (COMS) randomized trial of I-125 brachytherapy for medium choroidal melanoma: I. visual acuity after 3 years COMS report no. 16

    B. M. Melia;D. H. Abramson;D. M. Albert;H. C. Boldt

  • The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) randomized trial of pre-enucleation radiation of large choroidal melanoma II: initial mortality findings COMS report no. 10

    B. S. Hawkins;A. K. Vine;J. Willis;B. Frueh

  • Pathologic features of surgically excised subretinal neovascular membranes in age-related macular degeneration

    Pedro F. Lopez;Hans E. Grossniklaus;H. Michael Lambert;Thomas M. Aaberg

  • Morphometric analysis of the choroid, Bruch's membrane, and retinal pigment epithelium in eyes with age-related macular degeneration.

    Christoph W. Spraul;Gabriele E. Lang;Hans E. Grossniklaus

  • Ultrastructural Features of Tissue Removed During Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery

    Hee-Seong Yoon;H. Logan Brooks;Antonio Capone;Nancy L. L'hernault

  • The American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for plaque brachytherapy of uveal melanoma and retinoblastoma

    E. Rand Simpson;Brenda Gallie;Normand Laperrierre;Akbar Beiki-Ardakani

  • Intravenous transferrin, RGD peptide and dual-targeted nanoparticles enhance anti-VEGF intraceptor gene delivery to laser-induced CNV

    S R Singh;H E Grossniklaus;S J Kang;H F Edelhauser

  • Clinicopathologic features of surgically excised choroidal neovascular membranes.

    H. E. Grossniklaus;A. K. Hutchinson;A. Capone;J. Woolfson

  • Characteristics of Drusen and Bruch's membrane in postmortem eyes with age-related macular degeneration.

    Christoph W. Spraul;Hans E. Grossniklaus

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen R. Planck
Stephen R. Planck Oregon Health & Science University
James T. Rosenbaum
James T. Rosenbaum Oregon Health & Science University
Mark R. Prausnitz
Mark R. Prausnitz Georgia Institute of Technology
W. Richard Green
W. Richard Green Johns Hopkins University
Carol L. Shields
Carol L. Shields Thomas Jefferson University
Frederick A. Jakobiec
Frederick A. Jakobiec Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
George O. Waring
George O. Waring Clemson University
Bita Esmaeli
Bita Esmaeli The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
David H. Abramson
David H. Abramson Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Nancy J. Newman
Nancy J. Newman Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, it’s valuable to explore related online degrees and career pathways in healthcare. Online programs offer a flexible, cost-effective route into various medical and allied health professions, especially for those balancing work or family obligations.

For those interested in pharmacy, online pharmd programs provide an opportunity to earn a doctoral degree in pharmacy from accredited institutions, often at a lower cost and with distance learning options. If data management and digital health piques your interest, consider a him degree online to prepare for leadership roles in managing patient information and healthcare records.

Support roles such as medical billing and coding are also in high demand. Affordable medical billing and coding programs can launch your career in healthcare administration in as little as a year. Likewise, current nurses looking to advance their practice can pursue most affordable online nurse practitioner programs, which open doors to higher responsibility and specialized patient care.

Best Scientists Citing Hans E. Grossniklaus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles