World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Claus Cursiefen

Claus Cursiefen

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
24630
World Ranking
17067
National Ranking
895

Claus Cursiefen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus Cursiefen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 763 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Claus Cursiefen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus Cursiefen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claus Cursiefen is affiliated with the University of Cologne in Germany and has contributed to research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Ophthalmology and related subfields such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology, and Immunology.

The scientist's research topics cover several aspects of eye health and disorders. These main topics include:

  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Corneal Surgery and Treatments
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions

Cursiefen has a significant number of publications in frequently encountered scientific venues. The primary journals and publication venues include:

  • Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde
  • Die Ophthalmologie
  • Der Ophthalmologe
  • Cornea
  • Acta Ophthalmologica

Among recent contributions are papers addressing various topics within ophthalmology and related fields. Notable works include:

  • One threat, different answers: the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cornea donation and donor selection across Europe, 2020, British Journal of Ophthalmology
  • A missing link between SARS-CoV-2 and the eye?: ACE2 expression on the ocular surface, 2020, Journal of Medical Virology
  • The novel role of lymphatic vessels in the pathogenesis of ocular diseases, 2023, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
  • Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Macrophage-Mediated Tissue Vascularization: Similarities and Differences Between Cornea and Skin, 2021, Frontiers in Immunology

Claus Cursiefen has collaborated extensively with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Björn Bachmann
  • Mario Matthaei
  • Deniz Hos
  • Felix Bock
  • Sebastian Siebelmann

Additionally, Cursiefen has contributed to academic literature through book publications, including a title published by Springer Nature:

  • Die Augenheilkunde, 2023

Best Publications

  • VEGF-A stimulates lymphangiogenesis and hemangiogenesis in inflammatory neovascularization via macrophage recruitment

    Claus Cursiefen;Lu Chen;Leonardo P. Borges;David Jackson

  • Inflammation-induced lymphangiogenesis in the cornea arises from CD11b-positive macrophages

    Kazuichi Maruyama;Masaaki Ii;Claus Cursiefen;Claus Cursiefen;David G. Jackson

  • Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

    Theofilos Tourtas;Kathrin Laaser;Bjoern O. Bachmann;Claus Cursiefen

  • Influence of Photodynamic Therapy on Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), VEGF Receptor 3, and Pigment Epithelium–Derived Factor

    Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth;Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehard;Claus Cursiefen;Stephan Michels

  • Inhibition of Hemangiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis after Normal–Risk Corneal Transplantation by Neutralizing VEGF Promotes Graft Survival

    Claus Cursiefen;Jingtai Cao;Lu Chen;Ying Liu

  • Bevacizumab as a Potent Inhibitor of Inflammatory Corneal Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis

    Felix Bock;Jasmine Onderka;Tina Dietrich;Bjo¨rn Bachmann

  • A stepwise approach to donor preparation and insertion increases safety and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

    Friedrich E Kruse;Kathrin Laaser;Claus Cursiefen;Ludwig M Heindl

  • Lymphatic vessels in vascularized human corneas: immunohistochemical investigation using LYVE-1 and podoplanin.

    Claus Cursiefen;Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt;Michael Küchle;Lydia Sorokin

  • Cutting Edge: Lymphatic Vessels, Not Blood Vessels, Primarily Mediate Immune Rejections After Transplantation

    Tina Dietrich;Felix Bock;Felix Bock;Don Yuen;Deniz Hos

  • Corneal lymphangiogenesis: evidence, mechanisms, and implications for corneal transplant immunology.

    Claus Cursiefen;Lu Chen;M. Dana;J. Streilein

  • Nonvascular VEGF receptor 3 expression by corneal epithelium maintains avascularity and vision.

    Claus Cursiefen;Lu Chen;Magali Saint-Geniez;Pedram Hamrah

  • Corneal neovascularization as a risk factor for graft failure and rejection after keratoplasty: an evidence-based meta-analysis.

    Bjorn Bachmann;Rod S. Taylor;Claus Cursiefen

  • Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 mediates induction of corneal alloimmunity

    Lu Chen;Pedram Hamrah;Claus Cursiefen;Qiang Zhang

  • Bevacizumab (Avastin) eye drops inhibit corneal neovascularization.

    Felix Bock;Yanyan König;Friedrich Kruse;Martin Baier

  • Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations after Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

    Michael Rudolph;Kathrin Laaser;Bjoern O. Bachmann;Claus Cursiefen

  • Bacterial keratitis early after corneal crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A.

    Matthias Pollhammer;Claus Cursiefen

  • Time course of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis after brief corneal inflammation.

    Claus Cursiefen;Kazuichi Maruyama;David G. Jackson;J. Wayne Streilein

  • Immune Privilege and Angiogenic Privilege of the Cornea

    Claus Cursiefen

  • Phase II Randomized, Double-Masked, Vehicle-Controlled Trial of Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor for Neurotrophic Keratitis.

    Stefano Bonini;Alessandro Lambiase;Paolo Rama;Francesco Sinigaglia

  • Immune reactions after modern lamellar (DALK, DSAEK, DMEK) versus conventional penetrating corneal transplantation.

    Deniz Hos;Mario Matthaei;Felix Bock;Kazuichi Maruyama

Frequent Co-Authors

Friedrich E. Kruse
Friedrich E. Kruse University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt
Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Reza Dana
Reza Dana Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Gottfried O. H. Naumann
Gottfried O. H. Naumann University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Peter Martus
Peter Martus University of Tübingen
Stanley J. Wiegand
Stanley J. Wiegand Regeneron (United States)
Jens Jordan
Jens Jordan German Aerospace Center
J W Streilein
J W Streilein Harvard University
André Reis
André Reis University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Norbert Pfeiffer
Norbert Pfeiffer Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine, there are flexible, affordable online programs that support diverse healthcare career pathways. Earning a certification or degree online can reduce educational costs and allow for part-time or remote study while building crucial skills.

If you want to work in medical offices or hospitals without direct patient care, consider a medical coding certification online. This qualification lets you interpret and manage medical records, a vital behind-the-scenes role in healthcare.

Aspiring nurses can explore the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs to fast-track their path into registered nursing. For current RNs seeking advancement, the cheapest nurse practitioner programs or the cheapest dnp programs online offer affordable, flexible ways to gain advanced credentials.

Exploring these online degrees allows you to balance studies with work or family obligations, and to enter or advance in a variety of well-paying healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Claus Cursiefen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles