World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt

Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
21834
World Ranking
16744
National Ranking
879

Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 422 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Ophthalmology, Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Stomatology

Overview

Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt is affiliated with the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research predominantly focuses on ophthalmology and related subfields such as radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging, molecular biology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and cell biology.

The scientist's work centers on topics including:

  • Corneal Surgery and Treatments
  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Skin and Cellular Biology Research
  • Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation

Some of the recent papers featuring Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt or their close collaborators include:

  • Osteocyte necrosis triggers osteoclast-mediated bone loss through macrophage-inducible C-type lectin, 2020, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Potential Functional Restoration of Corneal Endothelial Cells in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy by ROCK Inhibitor (Ripasudil), 2020, American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • L-arginine metabolism inhibits arthritis and inflammatory bone loss, 2023, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Mitochondrial respiration in B lymphocytes is essential for humoral immunity by controlling the flux of the TCA cycle, 2022, Cell Reports
  • Case Report: Neutralization of Autoantibodies Targeting G-Protein-Coupled Receptors Improves Capillary Impairment and Fatigue Symptoms After COVID-19 Infection, 2021, Frontiers in Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt include:

  • Friedrich E. Kruse
  • Theofilos Tourtas
  • Andreas Gießl
  • Naresh Polisetti
  • Berthold Seitz

The scientist often publishes in venues such as:

  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Cells
  • Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde
  • Scientific Reports
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science

Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt's research contributions have been recognized by the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina with an award in 2018 for work spanning ophthalmology, oto-rhino-laryngology, and stomatology.

Best Publications

  • Ocular and Systemic Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome

    Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt;Gottfried O.H. Naumann

  • Human optic nerve fiber count and optic disc size.

    J. B. Jonas;A. M. Schmidt;J. A. Müller-Bergh;U. M. Schlötzer-Schrehardt

  • Pseudoexfoliation syndrome for the comprehensive ophthalmologist. Intraocular and systemic manifestations.

    Gottfried O.H Naumann;Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt;Michael Küchle

  • Identification and characterization of limbal stem cells.

    Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt;Friedrich E. Kruse

  • PSEUDOEXFOLIATION SYNDROME, OCULAR MANIFESTATION OF A SYSTEMIC DISORDER?

    Ursula M. Schlötzer-Schrehardt;Mahmut R. Koca;Gottfried O. H. Naumann;Hildegard Volkholz

  • Histomorphometry of the human optic nerve.

    J B Jonas;J A Müller-Bergh;U M Schlötzer-Schrehardt;G O Naumann

  • Factor H–related protein 1 (CFHR-1) inhibits complement C5 convertase activity and terminal complex formation

    Stefan Heinen;Andrea Hartmann;Nadine Lauer;Ulrike Wiehl

  • Exfoliation (pseudoexfoliation) syndrome: toward a new understanding. Proceedings of the First International Think Tank.

    Robert Ritch;Ursula Schlötzer‐Schrehardt

  • Dose-related structural effects of photodynamic therapy on choroidal and retinal structures of human eyes

    Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt;Arne Viestenz;Gottfried O H Naumann;Horst Laqua

  • A stepwise approach to donor preparation and insertion increases safety and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

    Friedrich E Kruse;Kathrin Laaser;Claus Cursiefen;Ludwig M Heindl

  • Lymphatic vessels in vascularized human corneas: immunohistochemical investigation using LYVE-1 and podoplanin.

    Claus Cursiefen;Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt;Michael Küchle;Lydia Sorokin

  • Morphometry of the human lamina cribrosa surface.

    J. B. Jonas;C. Y. Mardin;U. Schlotzer-Schrehardt;G. O. H. Naumann

  • Role of Transforming Growth Factor-β1 and its Latent Form Binding Protein in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome ☆

    Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt;Matthias Zenkel;Michael Küchle;Lynn Y. Sakai

  • Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in aqueous humor of patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome/glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma

    Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt;Jürgen Lommatzsch;Michael Küchle;Anastasios G P Konstas

  • Why is glaucoma associated with exfoliation syndrome

    Robert Ritch;Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt;Anastasios G P Konstas

  • Pseudoexfoliation syndrome and aneurysms of the abdominal aorta

    S. Schumacher;U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt;P. Martus;W. Lang

  • Characterization of extracellular matrix components in the limbal epithelial stem cell compartment

    U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt;T. Dietrich;K. Saito;L. Sorokin

  • A Histopathologic Study of Zonular Instability in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome

    Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt;Gottfried O.H. Naumann

  • Autophagy inhibition promotes SNCA/alpha-synuclein release and transfer via extracellular vesicles with a hybrid autophagosome-exosome-like phenotype

    Georgia Minakaki;Stefanie Menges;Agnes Kittel;Evangelia Emmanouilidou

  • Expression and localization of FP and EP prostanoid receptor subtypes in human ocular tissues.

    Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt;Matthias Zenkel;Rolf M Nüsing

Frequent Co-Authors

Friedrich E. Kruse
Friedrich E. Kruse University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Gottfried O. H. Naumann
Gottfried O. H. Naumann University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Claus Cursiefen
Claus Cursiefen University of Cologne
Shigeru Kinoshita
Shigeru Kinoshita Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
André Reis
André Reis University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Chiea Chuen Khor
Chiea Chuen Khor Agency for Science, Technology and Research
Robert Ritch
Robert Ritch New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
Peter F. Zipfel
Peter F. Zipfel Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Tin Aung
Tin Aung National University of Singapore
Jürgen Winkler
Jürgen Winkler University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career pathways in medicine doesn’t always mean attending traditional medical school. A variety of online degrees now offer flexible options for students seeking a career in healthcare. For those interested in advanced nursing roles, direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online are a popular choice, especially for individuals with a non-nursing background who want to accelerate their journey into the nursing profession.

If you are looking for more accessible entry points into nursing, consider schools identified as direct entry nursing programs. These programs typically have less competitive admissions, making it easier for qualified candidates to get started quickly.

Not everyone interested in healthcare wants to work in clinical settings. For those who prefer administrative or technical roles, the best online medical billing and coding schools offer fully accredited programs and may even provide financial aid opportunities.

It’s important to note that entrance requirements for nursing programs can vary. Not all schools require standardized entrance exams—some of the do all nursing schools require the teas list offer options that waive the TEAS or HESI exams, making the application process less daunting.

Best Scientists Citing Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles