World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 107 6336 5959 3379 3133 839 35279

Jeffrey M. Liebmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeffrey M. Liebmann between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeffrey M. Liebmann published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 24.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 61 publications in 2012. 44 of the 890 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 61. Peak 61 publications in 2012. 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 25 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 35 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 42 publications 2010: 46 publications 2011: 55 publications 2012: 61 publications 2013: 47 publications 2014: 41 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 37 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 18 publications
1989 2025

890 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeffrey M. Liebmann: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 3
1990 2
1991 4
1992 9
1993 5
1994 14
1995 5
1996 18
1997 7
1998 15
1999 17
2000 18
2001 12
2002 14
2003 13
2004 25
2005 19
2006 35
2007 33
2008 23
2009 42
2010 46
2011 55
2012 61
2013 47
2014 41
2015 22
2016 36
2017 34
2018 25
2019 26
2020 28
2021 37
2022 29
2023 26
2024 26
2025 18
Total 890
Download as CSV

Jeffrey M. Liebmann publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey M. Liebmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 821–840 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 839 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186 839
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeffrey M. Liebmann D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey M. Liebmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 107
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeffrey M. Liebmann is affiliated with the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with an emphasis on ophthalmology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, epidemiology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and neurology.

The central themes in their work relate to glaucoma and retinal disorders, retinal diseases and treatments, retinal imaging and analysis, corneal surgery and disorders, retinal and optic conditions, ophthalmology and visual impairment studies, and ocular surface and contact lens.

Frequent coauthors of Jeffrey M. Liebmann include Robert N. Weinreb, Christopher A. Girkin, Linda M. Zangwill, George A. Cioffi, and Massimo A. Fazio.

The researcher has contributed numerous publications to several scientific venues, notably:

  • Journal of Glaucoma
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • JAMA Ophthalmology
  • Ophthalmology Glaucoma
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology

Representative recent papers authored or coauthored by Jeffrey M. Liebmann include:

  • "Nicotinamide and Pyruvate for Neuroenhancement in Open-Angle Glaucoma" (2021, JAMA Ophthalmology)
  • "Detecting Glaucoma from Fundus Photographs Using Deep Learning without Convolutions" (2022, Ophthalmology Science)
  • "Detecting glaucoma with only OCT: Implications for the clinic, research, screening, and AI development" (2022, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research)
  • "Effects of Study Population, Labeling and Training on Glaucoma Detection Using Deep Learning Algorithms" (2020, Translational Vision Science & Technology)
  • "Assessment of Cumulative Incidence and Severity of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Among Participants in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study After 20 Years of Follow-up" (2021, JAMA Ophthalmology)

Best Publications

  • Glaucomatous damage of the macula

    Donald C. Hood;Ali S. Raza;Carlos Gustavo V. de Moraes;Carlos Gustavo V. de Moraes;Jeffrey M. Liebmann;Jeffrey M. Liebmann

  • Analysis of Myocilin Mutations in 1703 Glaucoma Patients From Five Different Populations

    John H. Fingert;Elise Héon;Jeffrey M. Liebmann;Tetsuya Yamamoto

  • Identification of a novel adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) gene on 5q22.1

    Sharareh Monemi;George Spaeth;Alexander DaSilva;Samuel Popinchalk

  • Evolving guidelines for intravitreous injections.

    Lloyd P. Aiello;Alexander J. Brucker;Stanley Chang;Emmett T. Cunningham

  • A randomized trial of brimonidine versus timolol in preserving visual function: results from the Low-Pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study.

    Theodore Krupin;Jeffrey M Liebmann;Jeffrey M Liebmann;David S Greenfield;Robert Ritch;Robert Ritch

  • Optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes

    Sek Tien Hoh;Sek Tien Hoh;David S Greenfield;David S Greenfield;Andrea Mistlberger;Andrea Mistlberger;Jeffrey M Liebmann;Jeffrey M Liebmann

  • Natural history of normal-tension glaucoma.

    D R Anderson;S M Drance;M Schulzer

  • Risk Factors for Visual Field Progression in Treated Glaucoma

    Carlos Gustavo V. De Moraes;Viral J. Juthani;Jeffrey M. Liebmann;Jeffrey M. Liebmann;Christopher C. Teng;Christopher C. Teng;Christopher C. Teng

  • Late bleb-related endophthalmitis after trabeculectomy with adjunctive 5-fluorouracil.

    Barbara Wolner;Jeffrey M. Liebmann;Joseph W. Sassani;Joseph W. Sassani;Robert Ritch

  • Heidelberg retina Tomography and optical coherence Tomography in normal, ocular-hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes

    Andrea Mistlberger;Jeffrey M. Liebmann;David S. Greenfield;Mauricio E. Pons

  • Latanoprost, a prostaglandin analog, for glaucoma therapy. Efficacy and safety after 1 year of treatment in 198 patients. Latanoprost Study Groups.

    Carl B. Camras;Albert Alm;Peter Watson;Johan Stjernschantz

  • Risk factors for glaucoma filtering bleb infections.

    Joern B. Soltau;Robert F. Rothman;Robert F. Rothman;Donald L. Budenz;David S. Greenfield;David S. Greenfield;David S. Greenfield

  • The African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): Design and Baseline Data

    Pamela A. Sample;Christopher A. Girkin;Linda M. Zangwill;Sonia Jain

  • Late-onset bleb leaks after glaucoma filtering surgery.

    David S. Greenfield;Jeffrey M. Liebmann;Jimmy Jee;Robert Ritch

  • Clinical Utility of Intraocular Pressure Monitoring Outside of Normal Office Hours in Patients With Glaucoma

    Yaniv Barkana;Sarah Anis;Jeffrey Liebmann;Celso Tello

  • Profile and predictors of normal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measured with frequency-domain optical coherence tomography.

    Jean-Claude Mwanza;Mary K Durbin;Donald L Budenz;Christopher A Girkin

  • The ISNT rule and differentiation of normal from glaucomatous eyes.

    Noga Harizman;Cristiano Oliveira;Allen Chiang;Celso Tello

  • Performance of Deep Learning Architectures and Transfer Learning for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy in Fundus Photographs

    Mark Christopher;Akram Belghith;Christopher Bowd;James A. Proudfoot

  • Blood vessel contributions to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness profiles measured with optical coherence tomography.

    Donald C. Hood;Brad Fortune;Stella N. Arthur;Danli Xing

  • An evidence-based assessment of risk factors for the progression of ocular hypertension and glaucoma ☆

    David S. Friedman;M.Roy Wilson;Jeffrey M. Liebmann;Robert D. Fechtner

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Ritch
Robert Ritch New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
Robert N. Weinreb
Robert N. Weinreb University of California, San Diego
Linda M. Zangwill
Linda M. Zangwill University of California, San Diego
Donald C. Hood
Donald C. Hood Columbia University
Felipe A. Medeiros
Felipe A. Medeiros Duke University
Hiroshi Ishikawa
Hiroshi Ishikawa Oregon Health & Science University
Pamela A. Sample
Pamela A. Sample University of California, San Diego
Harry A. Quigley
Harry A. Quigley Johns Hopkins University
Xian Zhang
Xian Zhang Hefei Institutes of Physical Science
Xiang Zhang
Xiang Zhang University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t just mean earning an MD. Many healthcare professionals advance their careers through online degrees tailored for specific fields. For registered nurses seeking greater responsibility, asn to nurse practitioner programs provide a flexible bridge toward becoming a nurse practitioner. These programs are designed for working nurses who want to upgrade their qualifications without stepping away from their job.

Those interested in nutrition and preventative healthcare can pursue a nutrition bachelor degree online. This pathway opens doors to wellness coaching, clinical nutrition, and public health roles.

For aspiring healthcare leaders, enrolling in a cahme accredited online Master of Healthcare Administration ensures you receive a quality education recognized by employers across the country.

Lastly, registered nurses aiming to further their education can consider rn to bsn online no clinicals accredited programs, allowing them to earn a BSN without required in-person clinical hours—ideal for balancing work and study.

These online degrees support various medical and health-related career paths, enabling students to progress in the fast-evolving healthcare landscape while maintaining flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey M. Liebmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles