World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
105
Citations
45286
World Ranking
6719
National Ranking
387

Peter Martus publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Martus sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 598 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Martus D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Martus sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Martus is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several specialized subfields including Oncology, Neurology, Clinical Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's recent work includes publications distributed across multiple topics, highlighting interdisciplinary expertise. Key topics explored in their research are:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Martus has published in a range of academic venues, showing a pattern of consistent contributions to high-impact journals. Frequently appearing publication venues include:

  • International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
  • Cancers
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

Their recent published papers reflect a diverse scope of investigation within medicine and oncology. Notable papers include:

  • "GLA/DRST real-world outcome analysis of CAR-T cell therapies for large B-cell lymphoma in Germany" (2022) published in Blood
  • "Safety and Vision Outcomes of Subretinal Gene Therapy Targeting Cone Photoreceptors in Achromatopsia" (2020) published in JAMA Ophthalmology
  • "Epidemiology of cutaneous melanoma and keratinocyte cancer in white populations 1943-2036" (2021) published in European Journal of Cancer
  • "Surgical versus clinical staging prior to primary chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages IIB-IVA: oncologic results of a prospective randomized international multicenter (Uterus-11) intergroup study" (2020) published in International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
  • "Spreading depolarizations in ischaemia after subarachnoid haemorrhage, a diagnostic phase III study" (2021) published in Brain

Collaboration plays a significant role in Martus's research activities, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Lina María Serna-Higuita
  • Inga Krauß
  • Stephan Zipfel
  • Katrin Elisabeth Giel
  • Monika A. Rieger

Martus's research contributions are largely grounded in clinical and translational studies that intersect oncology, neurology, and mental health. Their work with CAR-T cell therapy, cancer immunotherapy biomarkers, and assessment of long-term COVID-19 effects denote engagement with emerging medical challenges.

Best Publications

  • Preoperative versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

    Rolf Sauer;Heinz Becker;Werner Hohenberger;Claus Rödel

  • Prognostic Significance of Tumor Regression After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

    Claus Rödel;Peter Martus;Thomas Papadoupolos;Laszlo Füzesi

  • A meta-analysis of the effects of treatment on left ventricular mass in essential hypertension

    Arnfried U Klingbeil;Markus Schneider;Markus Schneider;Peter Martus;Peter Martus;Franz H Messerli;Franz H Messerli

  • Reversal of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Essential Hypertension: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Double-blind Studies

    Roland E. Schmieder;Peter Martus;Arnfried Klingbeil

  • Complete lymph node dissection versus no dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy positive melanoma (DeCOG-SLT): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

    Ulrike Leiter;Rudolf Stadler;Cornelia Mauch;Werner Hohenberger

  • Extended treatment duration for hepatitis C virus type 1: comparing 48 versus 72 weeks of peginterferon-alfa-2a plus ribavirin.

    Thomas Berg;Michael von Wagner;Samer Nasser;Christoph Sarrazin

  • Two Novel Equations to Estimate Kidney Function in Persons Aged 70 Years or Older

    Elke S Schaeffner;Natalie Ebert;Pierre Delanaye;Ulrich Frei

  • High-dose methotrexate with or without whole brain radiotherapy for primary CNS lymphoma (G-PCNSL-SG-1): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial

    Eckhard Thiel;Agnieszka Korfel;Peter Martus;Lothar Kanz

  • Baseline Peripheral Blood Biomarkers Associated with Clinical Outcome of Advanced Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab.

    Alexander Martens;Kilian Wistuba-Hamprecht;Marnix H Geukes Foppen;Jianda Yuan

  • Baseline Biomarkers for Outcome of Melanoma Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab.

    Benjamin Weide;Alexander Martens;Jessica C. Hassel;Carola Berking

  • Enamel and dentine remineralization by nano-hydroxyapatite toothpastes.

    Peter Tschoppe;Daniela Leal Zandim;Peter Martus;Andrej M. Kielbassa;Andrej M. Kielbassa

  • Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.

    A. Guelzow;O. Stamm;P. Martus;A. M. Kielbassa

  • Development and validation of the Urticaria Control Test: a patient-reported outcome instrument for assessing urticaria control.

    Karsten Weller;Adriane Groffik;Martin K. Church;Tomasz Hawro

  • The impact of aging and gender on brain viscoelasticity.

    Ingolf Sack;Bernd Beierbach;Jens Wuerfel;Dieter Klatt

  • How to assess disease activity in patients with chronic urticaria

    A. Młynek;A. Zalewska-Janowska;P. Martus;P. Staubach

  • Microglia turnover with aging and in an Alzheimer's model via long-term in vivo single-cell imaging

    Petra Füger;Petra Füger;Jasmin K Hefendehl;Jasmin K Hefendehl;Karthik Veeraraghavalu;Ann-Christin Wendeln;Ann-Christin Wendeln

  • Intensive speech and language therapy in patients with chronic aphasia after stroke: a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial in a health-care setting

    Caterina Breitenstein;Tanja Grewe;Agnes Flöel;Wolfram Ziegler

  • Recording, analysis, and interpretation of spreading depolarizations in neurointensive care: Review and recommendations of the COSBID research group

    Jens P. Dreier;Martin Fabricius;Cenk Ayata;Oliver W. Sakowitz

  • MR-elastography reveals degradation of tissue integrity in multiple sclerosis

    Jens Wuerfel;Friedemann Paul;Bernd Beierbach;Uwe Hamhaber

  • Prediction of postoperative outcome after hepatectomy with a new bedside test for maximal liver function capacity.

    Martin Stockmann;Johan F. Lock;Björn Riecke;Karsten Heyne

Frequent Co-Authors

Rolf Sauer
Rolf Sauer University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Eckhard Thiel
Eckhard Thiel Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Jost B. Jonas
Jost B. Jonas Heidelberg University
Michael Weller
Michael Weller University of Zurich
Claus Garbe
Claus Garbe University of Tübingen
Rainer Fietkau
Rainer Fietkau University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Marcus Maurer
Marcus Maurer Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Eckhart G. Hahn
Eckhart G. Hahn University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Claus Rödel
Claus Rödel Goethe University Frankfurt
Stephan Zipfel
Stephan Zipfel University of Tübingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but looking for flexible or alternative routes to a career in medicine? There are many rewarding online degree programs and pathways beyond the traditional MD track.

For those drawn to patient care, you may be wondering whats the easiest nursing program to get into? Online nursing programs are becoming more accessible, with some options designed to ease entry requirements. In fact, you can even find nursing schools that don't require teas test, making the admissions process smoother for aspiring nurses.

Administrative roles are also in high demand. A degree in healthcare administration is available through accelerated online programs, allowing you to quickly gain skills in managing healthcare facilities and systems.

Alternatively, if you are looking for a non-clinical option, you can explore financial aid for medical billing and coding to help you get started in one of the fastest-growing fields in healthcare.

These online pathways offer flexibility, lower barriers to entry, and can lead to in-demand healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Martus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles